The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A role for Piezo2 in EPAC1-dependent mechanical allodynia
Open accessAbstract
Aberrant mechanosensation has an important role in different pain states. Here we show that Epac1 (cyclic AMP sensor) potentiation of Piezo2-mediated mechanotransduction contributes to mechanical allodynia. Dorsal root ganglia Epac1 mRNA levels increase during neuropathic pain, and nerve damage-induced allodynia is reduced in Epac1−/− mice. The Epac-selective cAMP analogue 8-pCPT sensitizes mechanically evoked currents in sensory neurons. Human Piezo2 produces large mechanically gated currents that are enhanced by the activation of the cAMP-sensor Epac1 or cytosolic calcium but are unaffected by protein kinase C or protein kinase A and depend on the integrity of the cytoskeleton. In vivo, 8-pCPT induces long-lasting allodynia that is prevented by the knockdown of Epac1 and attenuated by mouse Piezo2 knockdown. Piezo2 knockdown also enhanced thresholds for light touch. Finally, 8-pCPT sensitizes responses to innocuous mechanical stimuli without changing the electrical excitability of sensory fibres. These data indicate that the Epac1–Piezo2 axis has a role in the development of mechanical allodynia during neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia describes the process whereby innocuous stimuli is perceived as being noxious and is a common symptom of neuropathic pain. Using mice deficient in the cAMP sensor Epac1, the authors in this study find that Epac1 regulates mechanical allodynia by sensitizing the mechanotransducer Piezo2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man
Bennett, G. J., & Xie, Y.-K. (1988) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90209-6 · Cited by 5,376
Piezo1 and Piezo2 Are Essential Components of Distinct Mechanically Activated Cation Channels
Coste, B., Mathur, J., Schmidt, M., Earley, T. J., Ranade, S., Petrus, M. J., Dubin, A. E., & Patapoutian, A. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1193270 · Cited by 3,316
Neuropathic Pain: A Maladaptive Response of the Nervous System to Damage
Costigan, M., Scholz, J., & Woolf, C. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135531 · Cited by 2,025
Cited by
Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice
Ranade, S. S., Woo, S.-H., Dubin, A. E., Moshourab, R. A., Wetzel, C., Petrus, M., Mathur, J., Bégay, V., Coste, B., Mainquist, J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13980 · Cited by 928
Self-citationNeural circuits for pain: Recent advances and current views
Peirs, C., & Seal, R. P. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8933 · Cited by 478
Advances in understanding nociception and neuropathic pain
St. John Smith, E. (2018) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8641-6 · Cited by 282
Piezo Proteins: Regulators of Mechanosensation and Other Cellular Processes
Bagriantsev, S. N., Gracheva, E. O., & Gallagher, P. G. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r114.612697 · Cited by 249
Xie, Z., Feng, J., Hibberd, T. J., Chen, B. N., Zhao, Y., Zang, K., Hu, X., Yang, X., Chen, L., Brookes, S. J., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.11.015 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Eijkelkamp, N., Linley, J. E., Torres, J. M., Bee, L., Dickenson, A. H., Gringhuis, M., Minett, M. S., Hong, G. S., Lee, E., Oh, U., Ishikawa, Y., Zwartkuis, F. J., Cox, J. J., & Wood, J. N.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-04-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1682-1682
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161535250
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.