The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic barcode assay for genetic detection of pathogens
Open accessAbstract
The task of rapidly identifying patients infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in resource-constrained environments remains a challenge. A sensitive and robust platform that does not require bacterial isolation or culture is critical in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Here we introduce a platform for the detection of nucleic acids based on a magnetic barcoding strategy. PCR-amplified mycobacterial genes are sequence-specifically captured on microspheres, labelled by magnetic nanoprobes and detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. All components are integrated into a single, small fluidic cartridge for streamlined on-chip operation. We use this platform to detect M. tuberculosis and identify drug-resistance strains from mechanically processed sputum samples within 2.5 h. The specificity of the assay is confirmed by detecting a panel of clinically relevant non-M. tuberculosis bacteria, and the clinical utility is demonstrated by the measurements in M. tuberculosis-positive patient specimens. Combined with portable systems, the magnetic barcode assay holds promise to become a sensitive, high-throughput and low-cost platform for point-of-care diagnostics. Detecting and phenotyping Mycobacterium tuberculosis, especially in resource-limited settings, is important for global tuberculosis control. Here Liong et al. report a point-of-care diagnostic platform based on magnetic barcoding and nuclear magnetic resonance for the detection of mycobacterial nucleic acids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction
Zuker, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg595 · Cited by 13,404
Ford, C. B., Lin, P. L., Chase, M. R., Shah, R. R., Iartchouk, O., Galagan, J., Mohaideen, N., Ioerger, T. R., Sacchettini, J. C., Lipsitch, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.811 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Cited by
Point-of-care microfluidic devices for pathogen detection
Nasseri, B., Soleimani, N., Rabiee, N., Kalbasi, A., Karimi, M., & Hamblin, M. R. (2018) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.050 · Cited by 382
The Era of Digital Health: A Review of Portable and Wearable Affinity Biosensors
Tu, J., Torrente‐Rodríguez, R. M., Wang, M., & Gao, W. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906713 · Cited by 357
Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
Ko, J., Hemphill, M., Yang, Z., Sewell, E., Na, Y. J., Sandsmark, D. K., Haber, M., Fisher, S. A., Torre, E. A., Svane, K. C., et al. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00672e · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Liong, M., Hoang, A. N., Chung, J., Gural, N., Ford, C. B., Min, C., Shah, R. R., Ahmad, R., Fernandez-Suarez, M., Fortune, S. M., Toner, M., Lee, H., & Weissleder, R.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1752-1752
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095265515
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.