The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-dimensional strutted graphene grown by substrate-free sugar blowing for high-power-density supercapacitors
Open accessAbstract
Three-dimensional graphene architectures in the macroworld can in principle maintain all the extraordinary nanoscale properties of individual graphene flakes. However, current 3D graphene products suffer from poor electrical conductivity, low surface area and insufficient mechanical strength/elasticity; the interconnected self-supported reproducible 3D graphenes remain unavailable. Here we report a sugar-blowing approach based on a polymeric predecessor to synthesize a 3D graphene bubble network. The bubble network consists of mono- or few-layered graphitic membranes that are tightly glued, rigidly fixed and spatially scaffolded by micrometre-scale graphitic struts. Such a topological configuration provides intimate structural interconnectivities, freeway for electron/phonon transports, huge accessible surface area, as well as robust mechanical properties. The graphene network thus overcomes the drawbacks of presently available 3D graphene products and opens up a wide horizon for diverse practical usages, for example, high-power high-energy electrochemical capacitors, as highlighted in this work. Three-dimensional graphene offers an ideal sheet-to-sheet connectivity of assembled graphenes, but often suffers from poor electrochemical performance. Wang et al. present a sugar-blowing technique to prepare a 3D graphene, which overcomes such problems and shows potential in supercapacitor applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
Graphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Self-Assembled Graphene Hydrogel via a One-Step Hydrothermal Process
Xu, Y., Sheng, K., Li, C., & Shi, G. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101187z · Cited by 3,251
Self-citation
Cited by
Wang, Q., Yan, J., & Fan, Z. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee03109e · Cited by 1,225
Graphene aerogels for efficient energy storage and conversion
Mao, J., Iocozzia, J., Huang, J., Meng, K., Lai, Y., & Lin, Z. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee03031b · Cited by 868
Flexible solid-state electrochemical supercapacitors
Yang, P., & Mai, W. (2014) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.05.022 · Cited by 830
Hydrophilic Hierarchical Nitrogen‐Doped Carbon Nanocages for Ultrahigh Supercapacitive Performance
Zhao, J., Lai, H., Lyu, Z., Jiang, Y., Xie, K., Wang, X., Wu, Q., Yang, L., Jin, Z., Ma, Y., et al. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201500945 · Cited by 788
Self-citationLow-crystalline iron oxide hydroxide nanoparticle anode for high-performance supercapacitors
Owusu, K. A., Qu, L., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhao, K., Yang, C., Hercule, K. M., Lin, C., Shi, C., Wei, Q., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14264 · Cited by 720
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhi, C., Wang, X., Tang, D., Xu, Y., Weng, Q., Jiang, X., Mitome, M., Golberg, D., & Bando, Y.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-12-16
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2905-2905
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979146846
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.