Cited by 434Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer-related Molecular PathwaysMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Tumour-associated mutant p53 drives the Warburg effect

Open access
Zhang, Cen, Liu, Juan, Liang, Yingjian, Wu, Rui, Zhao, Yuhan, Hong, Xuehui, Lin, Meihua, Yu, Haiyang +4 more·2013·Nature Communications

Abstract

Tumour cells primarily utilize aerobic glycolysis for energy production, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. Its mechanism is not well understood. The tumour suppressor gene p53 is frequently mutated in tumours. Many tumour-associated mutant p53 (mutp53) proteins not only lose tumour suppressive function but also gain new oncogenic functions that are independent of wild-type p53, defined as mutp53 gain of function (GOF). Here we show that tumour-associated mutp53 stimulates the Warburg effect in cultured cells and mutp53 knockin mice as a new mutp53 GOF. Mutp53 stimulates the Warburg effect through promoting GLUT1 translocation to the plasma membrane, which is mediated by activated RhoA and its downstream effector ROCK. Inhibition of RhoA/ROCK/GLUT1 signalling largely abolishes mutp53 GOF in stimulating the Warburg effect. Furthermore, inhibition of glycolysis in tumour cells greatly compromises mutp53 GOF in promoting tumorigenesis. Thus, our results reveal a new mutp53 GOF and a mechanism for controlling the Warburg effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms3935

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GOF mut-p53 induces an anomalous, carcinogenic metabolism (i.e., lipid metabolism and Warburg effect) and disturbed tissue architecture.

    “In addition, GOF mut-p53 induces an anomalous, carcinogenic metabolism (i.e., lipid metabolism and Warburg effect) and disturbed tissue architecture [70,71].”

    From The p53 Pathway in Glioblastoma (2018) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Abstract and Results report that gain-of-function mutant p53 stimulates the Warburg effect and that this contributes to tumorigenesis. The Discussion mentions lipid metabolism as a function reported by earlier studies, but our copy does not support the claim that mutant p53 disturbs tissue architecture. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pancreatic cancers generate substantial lactic acid fluxes, linked to mutations that promote hyper-proliferation.

    “pancreatic cancers generate substantial lactic acid fluxes, linked to mutations that promote hyper-proliferation”

    From Dynamic IL-6R/STAT3 signaling leads to heterogeneity of metabolic phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results section ('Mutp53 stimulates the Warburg Effect in vitro and in vivo'; page unavailable) reports increased lactate production in mutant-p53 lung and breast cancer cells and links mutant p53 to the Warburg effect. It does not establish substantial lactic acid fluxes in pancreatic cancers specifically, or show that those fluxes are linked to mutations promoting hyper-proliferation there. The only pancreatic-cancer mention found is in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TP53 mutations disinhibit glucose metabolism.

    “mutations in TP53 disinhibit glucose metabolism.18,19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 434

Authors
Zhang, C., Liu, J., Liang, Y., Wu, R., Zhao, Y., Hong, X., Lin, M., Yu, H., Liu, L., Levine, A. J., Hu, W., & Feng, Z.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Harbin Medical University (CN)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Wenwei
  • Feng, Zhaohui
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2013-12-17
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
2935-2935
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067265392
Cited by
434
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH)
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (W81XWH)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA143204, P01CA087497, R01CA160558, P30CA072720)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
mutant p53, Warburg effect, aerobic glycolysis, RhoA, rocks, gain-of-function, tumor suppressor, glucose uptake, carcinogenesis, glycolysis inhibition
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Glucose, Humans, Lactates, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Neoplasms, Genes, p53, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Glucose Transporter Type 1, Mice, rho-Associated Kinases, Walker-Warburg Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review