The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ligand substitutions between ruthenium–cymene compounds can control protein versus DNA targeting and anticancer activity
Open accessAbstract
Ruthenium compounds have become promising alternatives to platinum drugs by displaying specific activities against different cancers and favourable toxicity and clearance properties. Nonetheless, their molecular targeting and mechanism of action are poorly understood. Here we study two prototypical ruthenium-arene agents—the cytotoxic antiprimary tumour compound [(η6-p-cymene)Ru(ethylene-diamine)Cl]PF6 and the relatively non-cytotoxic antimetastasis compound [(η6-p-cymene)Ru(1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane)Cl2]—and discover that the former targets the DNA of chromatin, while the latter preferentially forms adducts on the histone proteins. Using a novel ‘atom-to-cell’ approach, we establish the basis for the surprisingly site-selective adduct formation behaviour and distinct cellular impact of these two chemically similar anticancer agents, which suggests that the cytotoxic effects arise largely from DNA lesions, whereas the protein adducts may be linked to the other therapeutic activities. Our study shows promise for developing new ruthenium drugs, via ligand-based modulation of DNA versus protein binding and thus cytotoxic potential, to target distinguishing epigenetic features of cancer cells. Ruthenium-cymene-based compounds are investigated as potential anticancer drugs. Here, Adhireksan et al.study two ruthenium-containing compounds with varying cytotoxicity and show that differences in ligand structure may explain their activity and binding to different subcellular targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., & Klein, M. L. (1983) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.445869 · Cited by 41,298
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H., & Pedersen, L. G. (1995) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.470117 · Cited by 22,514
Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling
Bussi, G., Donadio, D., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2408420 · Cited by 18,089
The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography
Collaborative Computational Project, N. 4. (1994) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444994003112 · Cited by 17,270
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
Hay, P. J., & Wadt, W. R. (1985) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.448975 · Cited by 15,577
[57] Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages
Maxam, A. M., & Gilbert, W. (1980) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9 · Cited by 14,315
Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials
Goedecker, S., Teter, M., & Hutter, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.1703 · Cited by 7,479
Cited by
Zeng, L., Gupta, P., Chen, Y., Wang, E., Ji, L., Chao, H., & Chen, Z.-S. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00195a · Cited by 1,017
Toward Multi-Targeted Platinum and Ruthenium Drugs—A New Paradigm in Cancer Drug Treatment Regimens?
Kenny, R. G., & Marmion, C. J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00271 · Cited by 636
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Self-citationMeier-Menches, S. M., Gerner, C., Berger, W., Hartinger, C. G., & Keppler, B. K. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00332c · Cited by 425
Alessio, E. (2017) · European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ejic.201600986 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Adhireksan, Z., Davey, G. E., Campomanes, P., Groessl, M., Clavel, C. M., Yu, H., Nazarov, A. A., Yeo, C. H. F., Ang, W. H., Dröge, P., Rothlisberger, U., Dyson, P. J., & Davey, C. A.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-03-18
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3462-3462
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040727845
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ligand substitutions between ruthenium–cymene compounds can control protein versus DNA targeting and anticancer activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms4462
- The paper
- Adhireksan, Z., Davey, G. E., Campomanes, P., Groessl, M., Clavel, C. M., Yu, H., Nazarov, A. A., Yeo, C. H. F., Ang, W. H., Dröge, P., Rothlisberger, U., Dyson, P. J., & Davey, C. A. (2014). Ligand substitutions between ruthenium–cymene compounds can control protein versus DNA targeting and anticancer activity. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.