Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,017

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 253 of the 253 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The development of anticancer ruthenium(ii) complexes: from single molecule compounds to nanomaterials

Open access
Zeng, Leli, Gupta, Pranav, Chen, Yanglu, Wang, Enju, Ji, Liangnian, Chao, Hui, Chen, Zhe-Sheng·2017·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

This review covers ruthenium(ii) complexes as anticancer drugs in single molecules and nanomaterials and includes targets, mechanisms, SAR, PDT and nano-systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7cs00195a

Cites

253 of 253 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 253 references

Cited by

See all 1,017

Metadata

Authors
Zeng, L., Gupta, P., Chen, Y., Wang, E., Ji, L., Chao, H., & Chen, Z.-S.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2017
Volume
46
Issue
19
Pages
5771-5804
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2726771194
Cited by
1,017
References
253
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of anticancer ruthenium(ii) complexes: from single molecule compounds to nanomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c7cs00195a
The paper
Zeng, L., Gupta, P., Chen, Y., Wang, E., Ji, L., Chao, H., & Chen, Z.-S. (2017). The development of anticancer ruthenium(ii) complexes: from single molecule compounds to nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00195a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.