Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 954

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride

Open access
Caldwell, Joshua D., Kretinin, Andrey V., Chen, Yiguo, Giannini, Vincenzo, Fogler, Michael M., Francescato, Yan, Ellis, Chase T., Tischler, Joseph G., Woods, Colin R., Giles, Alexander J., Hong, Minghui, Watanabe, Kenji, Taniguchi, Takashi, Maier, Stefan A., Novoselov, Kostya S.·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

Strongly anisotropic media, where the principal components of the dielectric tensor have opposite signs, are called hyperbolic. Such materials exhibit unique nanophotonic properties enabled by the highly directional propagation of slow-light modes localized at deeply sub-diffractional length scales. While artificial hyperbolic metamaterials have been demonstrated, they suffer from high plasmonic losses and require complex nanofabrication, which in turn induces size-dependent limitations on optical confinement. The low-loss, mid-infrared, natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride is an attractive alternative. Here we report on three-dimensionally confined ‘hyperbolic polaritons’ in boron nitride nanocones that support four series (up to the seventh order) modes in two spectral bands. The resonant modes obey the predicted aspect ratio dependence and exhibit high-quality factors (Q up to 283) in the strong confinement regime (up to λ/86). These observations assert hexagonal boron nitride as a promising platform for studying novel regimes of light–matter interactions and nanophotonic device engineering. Hyperbolic metamaterials exhibit interesting optical phenomena that could provide useful functionalities, if the losses can be reduced. Here Caldwell et al.show that hexagonal boron nitride supports hyperbolic polaritons, presenting a natural alternative to metamaterial systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms6221

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 954

Metadata

Authors
Caldwell, J. D., Kretinin, A. V., Chen, Y., Giannini, V., Fogler, M. M., Francescato, Y., Ellis, C. T., Tischler, J. G., Woods, C. R., Giles, A. J., Hong, M., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Maier, S. A., & Novoselov, K. S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-10-17
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
5221-5221
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017241715
Cited by
954
References
4
FWCI
28.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.