The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit
Open accessAbstract
Superconducting circuits have attracted growing interest in recent years as a promising candidate for fault-tolerant quantum information processing. Extensive efforts have always been taken to completely shield these circuits from external magnetic fields to protect the integrity of the superconductivity. Here we show vortices can improve the performance of superconducting qubits by reducing the lifetimes of detrimental single-electron-like excitations known as quasiparticles. Using a contactless injection technique with unprecedented dynamic range, we quantitatively distinguish between recombination and trapping mechanisms in controlling the dynamics of residual quasiparticle, and show quantized changes in quasiparticle trapping rate because of individual vortices. These results highlight the prominent role of quasiparticle trapping in future development of superconducting qubits, and provide a powerful characterization tool along the way. Superconducting circuits are one possible way of realizing qubits, but the time for which they can maintain their quantum state is limited by single-electron-like excitations. Wang et al. now demonstrate a technique for controlling these so-called quasiparticles and improving qubit lifetime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of Recombination Lifetimes in Superconductors
Rothwarf, A., & Taylor, B. N. (1967) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.27 · Cited by 628
An elasto-mechanical unfeelability cloak made of pentamode metamaterials
Bückmann, T., Thiel, M., Kadic, M., Schittny, R., & Wegener, M. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5130 · Cited by 623
Cited by
Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware
de Leon, N. P., Itoh, K. M., Kim, D., Mehta, K. K., Northup, T. E., Paik, H., Palmer, B. S., Samarth, N., Sangtawesin, S., & Steuerman, D. W. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2823 · Cited by 710
The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility
Yan, F., Gustavsson, S., Kamal, A., Birenbaum, J., Sears, A. P., Hover, D., Gudmundsen, T. J., Rosenberg, D., Samach, G., Weber, S., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12964 · Cited by 587
Place, A. P. M., Rodgers, L. V. H., Mundada, P., Smitham, B. M., Fitzpatrick, M., Leng, Z., Premkumar, A., Bryon, J., Vrajitoarea, A., Sussman, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5 · Cited by 563
Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction
Mirhosseini, M., Sipahigil, A., Kalaee, M., & Painter, O. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3038-6 · Cited by 486
Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits
Siddiqi, I. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00370-4 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Gao, Y. Y., Pop, I. M., Vool, U., Axline, C., Brecht, T., Heeres, R. W., Frunzio, L., Devoret, M. H., Catelani, G., Glazman, L. I., & Schoelkopf, R. J.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-12-18
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5836-5836
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071116935
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms6836
- The paper
- Wang, C., Gao, Y. Y., Pop, I. M., Vool, U., Axline, C., Brecht, T., Heeres, R. W., Frunzio, L., Devoret, M. H., Catelani, G., Glazman, L. I., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2014). Measurement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a superconducting qubit. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.