Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unusually high soil nitrogen oxide emissions influence air quality in a high-temperature agricultural region

Open access
Oikawa, P. Y., Ge, C., Wang, J., Eberwein, J. R., Liang, L. L., Allsman, L. A., Grantz, D. A., Jenerette, G. D.·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Fertilized soils have large potential for production of soil nitrogen oxide (NO x=NO+NO 2), however these emissions are difficult to predict in high-temperature environments. Understanding these emissions may improve air quality modelling as NO x contributes to formation of tropospheric ozone (O 3), a powerful air pollutant. Here we identify the environmental and management factors that regulate soil NO x emissions in a high-temperature agricultural region of California. We also investigate whether soil NO x emissions are capable of influencing regional air quality. We report some of the highest soil NO x emissions ever observed. Emissions vary nonlinearly with fertilization, temperature and soil moisture. We find that a regional air chemistry model often underestimates soil NO x emissions and NO x at the surface and in the troposphere. Adjusting the model to match NO x observations leads to elevated tropospheric O 3. Our results suggest management can greatly reduce soil NO x emissions, thereby improving air quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms9753

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Oikawa, P. Y., Ge, C., Wang, J., Eberwein, J. R., Liang, L. L., Allsman, L. A., Grantz, D. A., & Jenerette, G. D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-11-10
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
8753-8753
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112158629
Cited by
171
References
1
FWCI
9.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.