Cited by 26Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsEnvironmental and Air Quality Management

Valuing the Air Quality Effects of Biochar Reductions on Soil NO Emissions

Pourhashem, Ghasideh, Rasool, Quazi Z., Zhang, Rui, Medlock, Kenneth B., Cohan, Daniel S., Masiello, Caroline A.·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

While it is clear that biochar can alter soil N 2 O emissions, data on NO impacts are scarce. Reports range from 0 to 67% soil NO emission reductions postbiochar amendment. We use regional air quality and health cost models to assess how these soil NO reductions could influence U.S. air quality and health costs. We find that at 67% soil NO reduction, widespread application of biochar to fertilized agricultural soils could reduce O 3 by up to 2.4 ppb and PM 2.5 by up to 0.15 μg/m 3 in some regions. Modeled biochar-mediated health benefits are up to $4.3 million/county in 2011, with impacts focused in the Midwest and Southwest. These potential air quality and health cobenefits of biochar use highlight the need for an improved understanding of biochar’s impacts on soil NO emissions. The benefits reported here should be included with estimates of other biochar benefits, such as crop yield increase, soil water management, and N 2 O reductions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b00748

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biochar application is important to the enhancement of organic carbon in soil because of an organic aggregate with electronegativity that can absorb CO2 from the air and can be beneficial to both the carbon sink of agricultural soil and the protection of air quality.

    “the biochar application is important to the enhancement of organic carbon in soil because of an organic aggregate with electronegativity that can absorb CO 2 from the air and can be beneficial to both the carbon sink of agricultural soil and the protection of air quality”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Pourhashem et al. 2017

  • Application of biochar can help improve the carbon sink function of the agricultural sector because it can aggregate soil organic carbon and absorb inorganic carbon (CO2) from the air and improve air quality.

    “The application of biochar can help improve the function in the carbon sink of agricultural sector because it can not only aggregate the SOC but also absorb the inorganic carbon (i.e., CO 2 ) that exists in the air”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Pourhashem et al. 2017

  • Biochar can absorb CO2 from the air and benefit the carbon sink of agricultural soil and air quality protection.

    “In addition, the application of biochar produced using residue is important to the enhancement of organic carbon in soil because of an organic aggregate with electronegativity that can absorb CO 2 from the air and can be beneficial to both the carbon sink of agricultural soil and the protection of air quality (Pourhashem et al. 2017).”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Pourhashem et al. 2017

  • Application of biochar produced from crop residue is important to the enhancement of organic carbon in soil.

    “In addition, the application of biochar produced using residue is important to the enhancement of organic carbon in soil because of an organic aggregate with electronegativity that can absorb CO 2 from the air and can be beneficial to both the carbon sink of agricultural soil and the protection of air quality (Pourhashem et al. 2017).”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Pourhashem et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pourhashem, G., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, R., Medlock, K. B., Cohan, D. S., & Masiello, C. A.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
Pourhashem, Ghasideh
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-08-10
Volume
51
Issue
17
Pages
9856-9863
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2739421441
Cited by
26
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rice Research Repository (Rice University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX11AR09G)
  • Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University
  • Shell Center for Sustainability, Rice University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental and Air Quality Management
Keywords
biochar, soil nitrous oxide emissions, nitric oxide emissions, air quality, health care costs, ozone, PM2.5, agricultural soils, regional air quality modeling, nitrogen management
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Air Pollutants, Charcoal, Fertilizers, Nitric Oxide, Soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review