Cited by 121DNA Repair MechanismsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Mechanisms of Disease: DNA repair defects and neurological disease

Subba Rao, Kalluri·2007·Nature Clinical Practice Neurology

Abstract

In this Review, familial and sporadic neurological disorders reported to have an etiological link with DNA repair defects are discussed, with special emphasis placed on the molecular link between the disease phenotype and the precise DNA repair defect. Of the 15 neurological disorders listed, some of which have symptoms of progeria, six--spinocerebellar ataxia with axonal neuropathy-1, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Down syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--seem to result from increased oxidative stress, and the inability of the base excision repair pathway to handle the damage to DNA that this induces. Five of the conditions (xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne's syndrome, trichothiodystrophy, Down syndrome, and triple-A syndrome) display a defect in the nucleotide excision repair pathway, four (Huntington's disease, various spinocerebellar ataxias, Friedreich's ataxia and myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2) exhibit an unusual expansion of repeat sequences in DNA, and four (ataxia-telangiectasia, ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder, Nijmegen breakage syndrome and Alzheimer's disease) exhibit defects in genes involved in repairing double-strand breaks. The current overall picture indicates that oxidative stress is a major causative factor in genomic instability in the brain, and that the nature of the resulting neurological phenotype depends on the pathway through which the instability is normally repaired.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncpneuro0448

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subba Rao, K.
Venue
Nature Clinical Practice Neurology
Published
2007-03
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
162-172
ISSN
  • 1745-834X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-8358
OpenAlex
W2008737416
Cited by
121
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Clinical Practice Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
DNA repair deficiency, neurological disorders, oxidative DNA damage, genomic instability, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, DNA double-strand break repair, Huntington's disease, spinocerebellar ataxia, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Down syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, trichothiodystrophy, triple A syndrome, Friedreich's ataxia, myotonic dystrophy, ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, repeat expansion, oxidative stress
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review