The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lang, T., & for the CONSORT Group (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012 · Cited by 3,835
Moher, D. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 · Cited by 2,545
Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic Factors
Altman, D. G., Lausen, B., Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1994) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/86.11.829 · Cited by 1,143
Self-citationThe STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., & Lijmer, J. G. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1 · Cited by 1,124
The Risk of Determining Risk with Multivariable Models
Concato, J., Feinstein, A. R., & Holford, T. R. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00009 · Cited by 1,115
Bast, R. C., Ravdin, P., Hayes, D. F., Bates, S., Fritsche, H., Jessup, J. M., Kemeny, N., Locker, G. Y., Mennel, R. G., & Somerfield, M. R. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1865 · Cited by 879
Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.1.1 · Cited by 862
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 · Cited by 756
Cited by
Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7594 · Cited by 4,388
Self-citationClinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA
Thierry, A. R., Mouliere, F., El Messaoudi, S., Mollevi, C., Lopez-Crapez, E., Rolet, F., Gillet, B., Gongora, C., Dechelotte, P., Robert, B., et al. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3511 · Cited by 678
Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy
Jain, R. K., Duda, D. G., Willett, C. G., Sahani, D. V., Zhu, A. X., Loeffler, J. S., Batchelor, T. T., & Sorensen, A. G. (2009) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.63 · Cited by 572
Kimbung, S., Lettiero, B., Feldt, M., Bosch, A., & Borgquist, S. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10746 · Cited by 79
Kashyap, A. S., Fernandez-Rodriguez, L., Zhao, Y., Monaco, G., Trefny, M. P., Yoshida, N., Martin, K., Sharma, A., Olieric, N., Shah, P., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.057 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI—EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics
- Venue
- Nature Clinical Practice Oncology
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 416-422
- ISSN
- 1743-4254 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-4262
- OpenAlex
- W2067640897
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncponc0252
- The paper
- for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI—EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics. (2005). REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
