The DOI matches its Crossref record.
2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To update the 1997 clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast and colorectal cancers. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. OPTIONS: Six tumor markers for colorectal cancer and eight for breast cancer were considered. They could be recommended or not for routine use or for special circumstances. In addition to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 15-3, CA 27.29 was also considered among the serum tumor markers for breast cancer. OUTCOMES: In general, the significant health outcomes identified for use in making clinical practice guidelines (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used. EVIDENCE: A computerized literature search from 1994 to March 1999 was performed. VALUES: The same values for use, utility, and levels of evidence were used by the committee. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The same benefit, harms, and costs were used. RECOMMENDATION: Changes were recommended (see Appendix). VALIDATION: The updated recommendations were validated by external review by the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s (ASCO’s) Health Services Research Committee and by ASCO’s Board of Directors. SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)
McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji237 · Cited by 2,162
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics, McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602678 · Cited by 1,394
Ayers, M., Symmans, W. F., Stec, J., Damokosh, A. I., Clark, E., Hess, K., Lecocke, M., Metivier, J., Booser, D., Ibrahim, N., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.05.166 · Cited by 566
REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)
for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI—EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics (2005) · Nature Clinical Practice Oncology · doi:10.1038/ncponc0252 · Cited by 561
Perez, E. A., Suman, V. J., Davidson, N. E., Martino, S., Kaufman, P. A., Lingle, W. L., Flynn, P. J., Ingle, J. N., Visscher, D., & Jenkins, R. B. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.4744 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Bast, R. C., Ravdin, P., Hayes, D. F., Bates, S., Fritsche, H., Jessup, J. M., Kemeny, N., Locker, G. Y., Mennel, R. G., & Somerfield, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-03-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1865-1878
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1955382134
- Cited by
- 879
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1865
- The paper
- Bast, R. C., Ravdin, P., Hayes, D. F., Bates, S., Fritsche, H., Jessup, J. M., Kemeny, N., Locker, G. Y., Mennel, R. G., & Somerfield, M. R. (2001). 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.