Cited by 179Cell death mechanisms and regulationCancer-related Molecular PathwaysAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug Insight: cancer therapy strategies based on restoration of endogenous cell death mechanisms

Reed, John C·2006·Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

Abstract

Cell death is a normal facet of human physiology, ensuring tissue homeostasis by offsetting cell production with cell demise. Neoplasms arise in part because of defects in physiological cell death mechanisms, contributing to pathological cell expansion. Defects in normal cell death pathways also contribute to cancer progression by permitting progressively aberrant cell behaviors, while also desensitizing tumor cells to immune-mediated attack, radiation, and chemotherapy. Through basic research, much has been learned about the molecular mechanisms responsible for cell turnover and how tumors escape cell death. By exploiting this knowledge base, several innovative strategies for eradicating malignancies have materialized that are based on restoration of natural pathways for cell autodestruction. Some of these strategies have advanced into human clinical trials. Several of the current strategies based on targeting core components of the cell death machinery for cancer therapy are reviewed here, and a summary of progress toward clinical applications is provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncponc0538

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hyer ML et al.: The FLIP-side of Fas (CD95) signaling. Clin Cancer Res, in press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–178 of 178

Metadata

Authors
Reed, J. C.
Affiliations
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Reed, John C
Venue
Nature Clinical Practice Oncology
Published
2006-07
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
388-398
ISSN
  • 1743-4254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4262
OpenAlex
W2125192217
Cited by
179
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Clinical Practice Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
cancer therapy, cell death pathways, apoptosis, epigenetic regulators, gene therapy, tumor immune evasion, tumor progression, clinical trials, cell turnover
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Mitochondria, Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Cell Death, Apoptosis, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review