Cited by 237Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsHip disorders and treatmentsProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research

Biological markers in osteoarthritis

Rousseau, Jean-Charles, Delmas, Pierre D·2007·Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive disorder characterized by destruction of articular cartilage and subchondral bone, and by synovial changes. The diagnosis of OA is generally based on clinical and radiographic changes, which occur fairly late during disease progression and have poor sensitivity for monitoring disease progression. Progression of joint damage is likely to result primarily from an imbalance between cartilage degradation and repair, so measuring markers of these processes would seem a promising approach to improve the prediction of disease progression at the individual level. Moreover, genetic markers might be useful predictors of prognosis. The lack of fully effective, chondroprotective medications has limited the use of such potential markers to monitor the effect of treatment for OA. Nevertheless, owing to their dynamic changes in response to treatment, biological markers might provide relevant information more rapidly than imaging techniques (such as radiography and MRI) can, and should contribute to our understanding of mechanisms that underlie the clinical efficacy of OA treatments. Most of the identified genes involved in OA encode signal-transduction proteins, which provide the potential for novel therapeutic approaches. In this Review, we will use the recently proposed BIPED (i.e. burden of disease, investigative, prognostic, efficacy of intervention and diagnostic) classification of OA markers to describe the potential usage of a given marker.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncprheum0508

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inter-laboratory standardization and age/sex/ethnicity-stratified reference ranges remain challenges for broad adoption of CTX-II and COMP.

    “Though inter-laboratory standardization and age/sex/ethnicity-stratified reference ranges remain challenges for broad adoption”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rousseau, J.-C., & Delmas, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Rousseau, Jean-Charles
Venue
Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology
Published
2007-06
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
346-356
ISSN
  • 1745-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-8390
OpenAlex
W2014041075
Cited by
237
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Keywords
osteoarthritis, biomarkers, disease progression, cartilage degeneration, cartilage repair, subchondral bone, genetic markers, prognosis, treatment monitoring, signal transduction proteins, chondroprotection
MeSH terms
Bone and Bones, Cartilage, Humans, Osteoarthritis, Severity of Illness Index, Synovial Membrane, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review