Cited by 69Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationSurgical Simulation and TrainingTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

Technology Insight: telementoring and telesurgery in urology

Challacombe, Ben, Kavoussi, Louis, Patriciu, Alexandru, Stoianovici, Dan, Dasgupta, Prokar·2006·Nature Clinical Practice Urology

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the field of minimally invasive surgery has been accompanied by a number of controversies. These novel surgical techniques offer benefits to the patient with regard to length of hospital stay, return to full activity, and cosmesis; also, they are often more cost-effective than open procedures. On the other hand, they are technically demanding, have a significant learning curve, and can be associated with high initial complication rates unless performed by experienced endoscopic surgeons. Telemedicine, which uses real-time video and information transfer, offers the potential to increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery through video-assisted surgery and through remote instruction. At present, remote communities, especially those within developed countries, can most immediately benefit from telesurgical approaches. Enthusiasm must be tempered by the issues of cost, security, surgeon liability and availability of the technology itself which have yet to be fully resolved. In this Review, the field of telemedicine, focusing specifically on telementoring and telesurgery, and its relevance to urology are discussed. From early experimental work to current clinical usage, the advantages of and problems in this evolving field are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncpuro0626

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • THz has advantages making it suitable for 6G communication: high bandwidth, high data rate up to several Gbps, high capacity and high throughput.

    “THz has many advantages making it suitable for 6G communication such as high bandwidth, high data rate (upto several Gbps), high capacity and high throughput [4].”
  • Cognitive radio helps many wireless systems access the same spectrum through spectrum sensing and interference management mechanisms.

    “It helps many wireless systems to access the same spectrum through spectrum sensing and interference management mechanisms [4].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Challacombe, B., Kavoussi, L., Patriciu, A., Stoianovici, D., & Dasgupta, P.
Affiliations
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Nature Clinical Practice Urology
Published
2006-11
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
611-617
ISSN
  • 1743-4270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4289
OpenAlex
W1983364333
Cited by
69
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Clinical Practice Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
telementoring, telesurgery, telemedicine, urology, robotic surgery, minimally invasive surgery, video-assisted surgery, rural healthcare access, surgeon liability, learning curve
MeSH terms
Humans, Robotics, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Telecommunications, Urology, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review