Cited by 536Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesPlant Molecular Biology Research

Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication

Tan, Lubin, Li, Xianran, Liu, Fengxia, Sun, Xianyou, Li, Chenggang, Zhu, Zuofeng, Fu, Yongcai, Cai, Hongwei +3 more·2008·Nature Genetics

Abstract

The transition from the prostrate growth of ancestral wild rice (O. rufipogon Griff.) to the erect growth of Oryza sativa cultivars was one of the most critical events in rice domestication. This evolutionary step importantly improved plant architecture and increased grain yield. Here we find that prostrate growth of wild rice from Yuanjiang County in China is controlled by a semi-dominant gene, PROG1 (PROSTRATE GROWTH 1), on chromosome 7 that encodes a single Cys(2)-His(2) zinc-finger protein. prog1 variants identified in O. sativa disrupt the prog1 function and inactivate prog1 expression, leading to erect growth, greater grain number and higher grain yield in cultivated rice. Sequence comparison shows that 182 varieties of cultivated rice, including 87 indica and 95 japonica cultivars from 17 countries, carry identical mutations in the prog1 coding region that may have become fixed during rice domestication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PROG1 and LPA1 are other genes that regulate tiller angle, and both encode putative zinc finger transcription factors with C-terminal EAR-like repression domains.

    “Other genes that regulate tiller angle are PROSTRATE GROWTH1 (PROG1; Tan et al., 2008) and LOOSE PLANT ARCHITECTURE 1 (LPA1; Wu et al., 2013). Both genes encode putative zinc finger transcription factors with C-terminal EAR-like repression domains.”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2008

  • The tiller base in the prog1 mutant shows asymmetric growth due to a higher cell number on the lower side of the tiller base.

    “The tiller base in the prog1 mutant shows asymmetric growth due to a higher cell number on the lower side of the tiller base.”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Tan et al., 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, L., Li, X., Liu, F., Sun, X., Li, C., Zhu, Z., Fu, Y., Cai, H., Wang, X., Xie, D., & Sun, C.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xie, Daoxin
  • Sun, Chuanqing
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2008-09-28
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1360-1364
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2016705673
Cited by
536
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
rice domestication, zinc finger proteins, Oryza rufipogon, rice, plant architecture, grain yield, chromosome 7
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Amino Acid Sequence, Inbreeding, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Plant Proteins, Oryza, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Crops, Agricultural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review