Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla)

Open access
Peng, Zhenhua, Lu, Ying, Li, Lubin, Zhao, Qiang, Feng, Qi, Gao, Zhimin, Lu, Hengyun, Hu, Tao, Yao, Na, Liu, Kunyan, Li, Yan, Fan, Danlin, Guo, Yunli, Li, Wenjun, Lu, Yiqi, Weng, Qijun, Zhou, CongCong, Zhang, Lei, Huang, Tao, Zhao, Yan, Zhu, Chuanrang, Liu, Xinge, Yang, Xuewen, Wang, Tao, Miao, Kun, Zhuang, Caiyun, Cao, Xiaolu, Tang, Wenli, Liu, Guanshui, Liu, Yingli, Chen, Jie, Liu, Zhenjing, Yuan, Licai, Liu, Zhenhua, Huang, Xuehui, Lu, Tingting, Fei, Benhua, Ning, Zemin, Han, Bin, Jiang, Zehui·2013·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Bin Han and colleagues report the draft genome of moso bamboo, an important non-timber forest product. RNA sequencing analysis of bamboo flowering tissues suggests a connection between drought-responsive genes and potential flowering genes. Bamboo represents the only major lineage of grasses that is native to forests and is one of the most important non-timber forest products in the world. However, no species in the Bambusoideae subfamily has been sequenced. Here, we report a high-quality draft genome sequence of moso bamboo (P. heterocycla var. pubescens). The 2.05-Gb assembly covers 95% of the genomic region. Gene prediction modeling identified 31,987 genes, most of which are supported by cDNA and deep RNA sequencing data. Analyses of clustered gene families and gene collinearity show that bamboo underwent whole-genome duplication 7–12 million years ago. Identification of gene families that are key in cell wall biosynthesis suggests that the whole-genome duplication event generated more gene duplicates involved in bamboo shoot development. RNA sequencing analysis of bamboo flowering tissues suggests a potential connection between drought-responsive and flowering genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2569

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 591

Metadata

Authors
Peng, Z., Lu, Y., Li, L., Zhao, Q., Feng, Q., Gao, Z., Lu, H., Hu, T., Yao, N., Liu, K., Li, Y., Fan, D., Guo, Y., Li, W., Lu, Y., Weng, Q., Zhou, C., Zhang, L., Huang, T., Zhao, Y., Zhu, C., Liu, X., Yang, X., Wang, T., Miao, K., Zhuang, C., Cao, X., Tang, W., Liu, G., Liu, Y., Chen, J., Liu, Z., Yuan, L., Liu, Z., Huang, X., Lu, T., Fei, B., Ning, Z., Han, B., & Jiang, Z.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-02-24
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
456-461
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2026299543
Cited by
591
References
53
FWCI
40.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.2569
The paper
Peng, Z., Lu, Y., Li, L., Zhao, Q., Feng, Q., Gao, Z., Lu, H., Hu, T., Yao, N., Liu, K., Li, Y., Fan, D., Guo, Y., Li, W., Lu, Y., Weng, Q., Zhou, C., Zhang, L., Huang, T., . . . Jiang, Z. (2013). The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2569

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.