Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromosome-level reference genome and alternative splicing atlas of moso bamboo ( Phyllostachys edulis )

Open access
Zhao, Hansheng, Gao, Zhimin, Wang, Le, Wang, Jiongliang, Wang, Songbo, Fei, Benhua, Chen, Chunhai, Shi, Chengcheng, Liu, Xiaochuan, Zhang, Hailin, Lou, Yongfeng, Chen, LianFu, Sun, Huayu, Zhou, Xianqiang, Wang, Sining, Zhang, Chi, Xu, Hao, Li, Lichao, Yang, Yihong, Wei, Yanli, Yang, Wei, Gao, Qiang, Yang, Huanming, Zhao, Shancen, Jiang, Zehui·2018·GigaScience

Abstract

Background: Bamboo is one of the most important nontimber forestry products worldwide. However, a chromosome-level reference genome is lacking, and an evolutionary view of alternative splicing (AS) in bamboo remains unclear despite emerging omics data and improved technologies. Results: Here, we provide a chromosome-level de novo genome assembly of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) using additional abundance sequencing data and a Hi-C scaffolding strategy. The significantly improved genome is a scaffold N50 of 79.90 Mb, approximately 243 times longer than the previous version. A total of 51,074 high-quality protein-coding loci with intact structures were identified using single-molecule real-time sequencing and manual verification. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive AS profile based on the identification of 266,711 unique AS events in 25,225 AS genes by large-scale transcriptomic sequencing of 26 representative bamboo tissues using both the Illumina and Pacific Biosciences sequencing platforms. Through comparisons with orthologous genes in related plant species, we observed that the AS genes are concentrated among more conserved genes that tend to accumulate higher transcript levels and share less tissue specificity. Furthermore, gene family expansion, abundant AS, and positive selection were identified in crucial genes involved in the lignin biosynthetic pathway of moso bamboo. Conclusions: These fundamental studies provide useful information for future in-depth analyses of comparative genome and AS features. Additionally, our results highlight a global perspective of AS during evolution and diversification in bamboo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gigascience/giy115

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, H., Gao, Z., Wang, L., Wang, J., Wang, S., Fei, B., Chen, C., Shi, C., Liu, X., Zhang, H., Lou, Y., Chen, L., Sun, H., Zhou, X., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Xu, H., Li, L., Yang, Y., Wei, Y., Yang, W., Gao, Q., Yang, H., Zhao, S., & Jiang, Z.
Venue
GigaScience
Published
2018-09-08
Volume
7
Issue
10
ISSN
2047-217X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891563800
Cited by
257
References
52
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome-level reference genome and alternative splicing atlas of moso bamboo ( Phyllostachys edulis ). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gigascience/giy115
The paper
Zhao, H., Gao, Z., Wang, L., Wang, J., Wang, S., Fei, B., Chen, C., Shi, C., Liu, X., Zhang, H., Lou, Y., Chen, L., Sun, H., Zhou, X., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Xu, H., Li, L., Yang, Y., . . . Jiang, Z. (2018). Chromosome-level reference genome and alternative splicing atlas of moso bamboo ( Phyllostachys edulis ). GigaScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.