Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 735

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity

Open access
Dulak, Austin M, Stojanov, Petar, Peng, Shouyong, Lawrence, Michael S, Fox, Cameron, Stewart, Chip, Bandla, Santhoshi, Imamura, Yu, Schumacher, Steven E, Shefler, Erica, McKenna, Aaron, Carter, Scott L, Cibulskis, Kristian, Sivachenko, Andrey, Saksena, Gordon, Voet, Douglas, Ramos, Alex H, Auclair, Daniel, Thompson, Kristin, Sougnez, Carrie, Onofrio, Robert C, Guiducci, Candace, Beroukhim, Rameen, Zhou, Zhongren, Lin, Lin, Lin, Jules, Reddy, Rishindra, Chang, Andrew, Landrenau, Rodney, Pennathur, Arjun, Ogino, Shuji, Luketich, James D, Golub, Todd R, Gabriel, Stacey B, Lander, Eric S, Beer, David G, Godfrey, Tony E, Getz, Gad, Bass, Adam J·2013·Nature Genetics

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has risen 600% over the last 30 years. With a 5-year survival rate of ∼15%, the identification of new therapeutic targets for EAC is greatly important. We analyze the mutation spectra from whole-exome sequencing of 149 EAC tumor-normal pairs, 15 of which have also been subjected to whole-genome sequencing. We identify a mutational signature defined by a high prevalence of A>C transversions at AA dinucleotides. Statistical analysis of exome data identified 26 significantly mutated genes. Of these genes, five (TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, ARID1A and PIK3CA) have previously been implicated in EAC. The new significantly mutated genes include chromatin-modifying factors and candidate contributors SPG20, TLR4, ELMO1 and DOCK2. Functional analyses of EAC-derived mutations in ELMO1 identifies increased cellular invasion. Therefore, we suggest the potential activation of the RAC1 pathway as a contributor to EAC tumorigenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2591

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 735

Metadata

Authors
Dulak, A. M., Stojanov, P., Peng, S., Lawrence, M. S., Fox, C., Stewart, C., Bandla, S., Imamura, Y., Schumacher, S. E., Shefler, E., McKenna, A., Carter, S. L., Cibulskis, K., Sivachenko, A., Saksena, G., Voet, D., Ramos, A. H., Auclair, D., Thompson, K., Sougnez, C., Onofrio, R. C., Guiducci, C., Beroukhim, R., Zhou, Z., Lin, L., Lin, J., Reddy, R., Chang, A., Landrenau, R., Pennathur, A., Ogino, S., Luketich, J. D., Golub, T. R., Gabriel, S. B., Lander, E. S., Beer, D. G., Godfrey, T. E., Getz, G., & Bass, A. J.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-03-24
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
478-486
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2114023704
Cited by
735
References
11
FWCI
81.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.2591
The paper
Dulak, A. M., Stojanov, P., Peng, S., Lawrence, M. S., Fox, C., Stewart, C., Bandla, S., Imamura, Y., Schumacher, S. E., Shefler, E., McKenna, A., Carter, S. L., Cibulskis, K., Sivachenko, A., Saksena, G., Voet, D., Ramos, A. H., Auclair, D., Thompson, K., . . . Bass, A. J. (2013). Exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2591

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.