Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan

Open access
Wang, Zhuo, Pascual-Anaya, Juan, Zadissa, Amonida, Li, Wenqi, Niimura, Yoshihito, Huang, Zhiyong, Li, Chunyi, White, Simon, Xiong, Zhiqiang, Fang, Dongming, Wang, Bo, Ming, Yao, Chen, Yan, Zheng, Yuan, Kuraku, Shigehiro, Pignatelli, Miguel, Herrero, Javier, Beal, Kathryn, Nozawa, Masafumi, Li, Qiye, Wang, Juan, Zhang, Hongyan, Yu, Lili, Shigenobu, Shuji, Wang, Junyi, Liu, Jiannan, Flicek, Paul, Searle, Steve, Wang, Jun, Kuratani, Shigeru, Yin, Ye, Aken, Bronwen, Zhang, Guojie, Irie, Naoki·2013·Nature Genetics

Abstract

The unique anatomical features of turtles have raised unanswered questions about the origin of their unique body plan. We generated and analyzed draft genomes of the soft-shell turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis) and the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas); our results indicated the close relationship of the turtles to the bird-crocodilian lineage, from which they split ∼267.9-248.3 million years ago (Upper Permian to Triassic). We also found extensive expansion of olfactory receptor genes in these turtles. Embryonic gene expression analysis identified an hourglass-like divergence of turtle and chicken embryogenesis, with maximal conservation around the vertebrate phylotypic period, rather than at later stages that show the amniote-common pattern. Wnt5a expression was found in the growth zone of the dorsal shell, supporting the possible co-option of limb-associated Wnt signaling in the acquisition of this turtle-specific novelty. Our results suggest that turtle evolution was accompanied by an unexpectedly conservative vertebrate phylotypic period, followed by turtle-specific repatterning of development to yield the novel structure of the shell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2615

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Pascual-Anaya, J., Zadissa, A., Li, W., Niimura, Y., Huang, Z., Li, C., White, S., Xiong, Z., Fang, D., Wang, B., Ming, Y., Chen, Y., Zheng, Y., Kuraku, S., Pignatelli, M., Herrero, J., Beal, K., Nozawa, M., Li, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Yu, L., Shigenobu, S., Wang, J., Liu, J., Flicek, P., Searle, S., Wang, J., Kuratani, S., Yin, Y., Aken, B., Zhang, G., & Irie, N.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-04-28
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
701-706
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2015299616
Cited by
431
References
15
FWCI
20.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.2615
The paper
Wang, Z., Pascual-Anaya, J., Zadissa, A., Li, W., Niimura, Y., Huang, Z., Li, C., White, S., Xiong, Z., Fang, D., Wang, B., Ming, Y., Chen, Y., Zheng, Y., Kuraku, S., Pignatelli, M., Herrero, J., Beal, K., Nozawa, M., . . . Irie, N. (2013). The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2615

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.