The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth
Open accessAbstract
What happens in early, still undetectable human malignancies is unknown because direct observations are impractical. Here we present and validate a 'Big Bang' model, whereby tumors grow predominantly as a single expansion producing numerous intermixed subclones that are not subject to stringent selection and where both public (clonal) and most detectable private (subclonal) alterations arise early during growth. Genomic profiling of 349 individual glands from 15 colorectal tumors showed an absence of selective sweeps, uniformly high intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) and subclone mixing in distant regions, as postulated by our model. We also verified the prediction that most detectable ITH originates from early private alterations and not from later clonal expansions, thus exposing the profile of the primordial tumor. Moreover, some tumors appear 'born to be bad', with subclone mixing indicative of early malignant potential. This new model provides a quantitative framework to interpret tumor growth dynamics and the origins of ITH, with important clinical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis
Fearon, E. R., & Vogelstein, B. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i · Cited by 12,132
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11252 · Cited by 8,499
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing
Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., Martinez, P., Matthews, N., Stewart, A., Tarpey, P., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113205 · Cited by 7,774
The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups
METABRIC Group, Curtis, C., Shah, S. P., Chin, S.-F., Turashvili, G., Rueda, O. M., Dunning, M. J., Speed, D., Lynch, A. G., Samarajiwa, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10983 · Cited by 6,097
Self-citationMutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes
Lawrence, M. S., Stojanov, P., Polak, P., Kryukov, G. V., Cibulskis, K., Sivachenko, A., Carter, S. L., Stewart, C., Mermel, C. H., Roberts, S. A., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12213 · Cited by 5,461
Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples
Cibulskis, K., Lawrence, M. S., Carter, S. L., Sivachenko, A., Jaffe, D., Sougnez, C., Gabriel, S., Meyerson, M., Lander, E. S., & Getz, G. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2514 · Cited by 4,981
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Schwartz, J. N., Hagerty, K. L., Allred, D. C., Cote, R. J., Dowsett, M., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hanna, W. M., Langer, A., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775 · Cited by 4,434
Self-citationGreaves, M., & Maley, C. C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10762 · Cited by 3,162
A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors
Ramaswamy, S., Ross, K. N., Lander, E. S., & Golub, T. R. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1060 · Cited by 2,449
Cited by
Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future
McGranahan, N., & Swanton, C. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018 · Cited by 2,840
Consensus molecular subtypes and the evolution of precision medicine in colorectal cancer
Dienstmann, R., Vermeulen, L., Guinney, J., Kopetz, S., Tejpar, S., & Tabernero, J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.126 · Cited by 1,021
From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer
Punt, C. J. A., Koopman, M., & Vermeulen, L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.171 · Cited by 654
Telomeres: history, health, and hallmarks of aging
Chakravarti, D., LaBella, K. A., & DePinho, R. A. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.028 · Cited by 637
The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer
Riggio, A. I., Varley, K. E., & Welm, A. L. (2021) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Sottoriva, A., Kang, H., Ma, Z., Graham, T. A., Salomon, M. P., Zhao, J., Marjoram, P., Siegmund, K., Press, M. F., Shibata, D., & Curtis, C.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2015-02-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-216
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- OpenAlex
- W2010873488
- Cited by
- 1,015
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 35.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.3214
- The paper
- Sottoriva, A., Kang, H., Ma, Z., Graham, T. A., Salomon, M. P., Zhao, J., Marjoram, P., Siegmund, K., Press, M. F., Shibata, D., & Curtis, C. (2015). A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.