Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study

Open access
Newton-Cheh, Christopher, Eijgelsheim, Mark, Rice, Kenneth M, de Bakker, Paul I W, Yin, Xiaoyan, Estrada, Karol, Bis, Joshua C, Marciante, Kristin, Rivadeneira, Fernando, Noseworthy, Peter A, Sotoodehnia, Nona, Smith, Nicholas L, Rotter, Jerome I, Kors, Jan A, Witteman, Jacqueline C M, Hofman, Albert, Heckbert, Susan R, O'Donnell, Christopher J, Uitterlinden, André G, Psaty, Bruce M, Lumley, Thomas, Larson, Martin G, Ch Stricker, Bruno H·2009·Nature Genetics

Abstract

QT interval duration, reflecting myocardial repolarization on the electrocardiogram, is a heritable risk factor for sudden cardiac death and drug-induced arrhythmias. We conducted a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies in 13,685 individuals of European ancestry from the Framingham Heart Study, the Rotterdam Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study, as part of the QTGEN consortium. We observed associations at P < 5 × 10−8 with variants in NOS1AP, KCNQ1, KCNE1, KCNH2 and SCN5A, known to be involved in myocardial repolarization and mendelian long-QT syndromes. Associations were found at five newly identified loci, including 16q21 near NDRG4 and GINS3, 6q22 near PLN, 1p36 near RNF207, 16p13 near LITAF and 17q12 near LIG3 and RFFL. Collectively, the 14 independent variants at these 10 loci explain 5.4–6.5% of the variation in QT interval. These results, together with an accompanying paper, offer insights into myocardial repolarization and suggest candidate genes that could predispose to sudden cardiac death and drug-induced arrhythmias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.364

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 413

Metadata

Authors
Newton-Cheh, C., Eijgelsheim, M., Rice, K. M., de Bakker, P. I. W., Yin, X., Estrada, K., Bis, J. C., Marciante, K., Rivadeneira, F., Noseworthy, P. A., Sotoodehnia, N., Smith, N. L., Rotter, J. I., Kors, J. A., Witteman, J. C. M., Hofman, A., Heckbert, S. R., O'Donnell, C. J., Uitterlinden, A. G., Psaty, B. M., Lumley, T., Larson, M. G., & Ch Stricker, B. H.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2009-03-22
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
399-406
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2119494804
Cited by
413
References
4
FWCI
31.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.364
The paper
Newton-Cheh, C., Eijgelsheim, M., Rice, K. M., de Bakker, P. I. W., Yin, X., Estrada, K., Bis, J. C., Marciante, K., Rivadeneira, F., Noseworthy, P. A., Sotoodehnia, N., Smith, N. L., Rotter, J. I., Kors, J. A., Witteman, J. C. M., Hofman, A., Heckbert, S. R., O'Donnell, C. J., Uitterlinden, A. G., . . . Ch Stricker, B. H. (2009). Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.364

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.