Cited by 3,162Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic diversity and population structure

Genomic Control for Association Studies

Devlin, B., Roeder, Kathryn·1999·Biometrics

Abstract

Summary. A dense set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) covering the genome and an efficient method to assess SNP genotypes are expected to be available in the near future. An outstanding question is how to use these technologies efficiently to identify genes affecting liability to complex disorders. To achieve this goal, we propose a statistical method that has several optimal properties: It can be used with case‐control data and yet, like family‐based designs, controls for population heterogeneity; it is insensitive to the usual violations of model assumptions, such as cases failing to be strictly independent; and, by using Bayesian outlier methods, it circumvents the need for Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, leading to better performance in many settings while still constraining risk for false positives. The performance of our genomic control method is quite good for plausible effects of liability genes, which bodes well for future genetic analyses of complex disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Devlin, B.
  • Roeder, Kathryn
Venue
Biometrics
Published
1999-12
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
997-1004
ISSN
  • 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0420
OpenAlex
W2008047653
Cited by
3,162
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 170 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 175 · 2012: 172
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biometrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 57881, P01MH056193, R01MH057881, NIMH 56193)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
genomic control, association studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms, case-control data, population heterogeneity, multiple testing correction, false positives, complex diseases, model assumption violation
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Biometry, Genetic Techniques, Humans, Models, Genetic, Models, Statistical, Genome, Human, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review