Cited by 1,104Plant Molecular Biology ResearchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement

OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice

Miura, Kotaro, Ikeda, Mayuko, Matsubara, Atsushi, Song, Xian-Jun, Ito, Midori, Asano, Kenji, Matsuoka, Makoto, Kitano, Hidemi +1 more·2010·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Identification of alleles that improve crop production and lead to higher-yielding varieties are needed for food security. Here we show that the quantitative trait locus WFP (WEALTHY FARMER'S PANICLE) encodes OsSPL14 (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 14, also known as IPA1). Higher expression of OsSPL14 in the reproductive stage promotes panicle branching and higher grain yield in rice. OsSPL14 controls shoot branching in the vegetative stage and is affected by microRNA excision. We also demonstrate the feasibility of using the OsSLP14(WFP) allele to increase rice crop yield. Introduction of the high-yielding OsSPL14(WFP) allele into the standard rice variety Nipponbare resulted in increased rice production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.592

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Map based cloning attempts to isolate the quantitative trait loci that determine IPA resulted in the isolation of IPA1/OsSPL14, which is expressed at the shoot tip and in developing branches.

    “Map based cloning attempts to isolate the quantitative trait loci that determine IPA resulted in the isolation of IPA1/OsSPL14, which is expressed at the shoot tip and in developing branches.”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Miura et al., 2010

  • IPA1/OsSPL14 is negatively regulated by the microRNA OsmiR156.

    “This gene is negatively regulated by the microRNA OsmiR156.”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Miura et al., 2010

  • The low tillering Oryza japonica lines ST-12 and Shaoniejing carry a mutation in the miR156 complementary site.

    “The low tillering Oryza japonica lines ST-12 and Shaoniejing that were independently analyzed by Jiao et al. (2010) and Miura et al. (2010), respectively, carry a mutation in the miR156 complementary site.”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Miura et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miura, K., Ikeda, M., Matsubara, A., Song, X.-J., Ito, M., Asano, K., Matsuoka, M., Kitano, H., & Ashikari, M.
Affiliations
Bioscience and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ashikari, Motoyuki
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2010-05-23
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
545-549
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2074833232
Cited by
1,104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 37
FWCI
55.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Keywords
SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE, panicle branching, rice yield, plant architecture, miR156, shoot branching, Nipponbare, food security
MeSH terms
Alleles, Feasibility Studies, Oryza, Genes, Plant, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Structures, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Quantitative Trait Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review