Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A genome-wide association study for myopia and refractive error identifies a susceptibility locus at 15q25

Open access
Hysi, Pirro G, Young, Terri L, Mackey, David A, Andrew, Toby, Fernández-Medarde, Alberto, Solouki, Abbas M, Hewitt, Alex W, Macgregor, Stuart, Vingerling, Johannes R, Li, Yi-Ju, Ikram, M Kamran, Fai, Lee Yiu, Sham, Pak C, Manyes, Lara, Porteros, Angel, Lopes, Margarida C, Carbonaro, Francis, Fahy, Samantha J, Martin, Nicholas G, van Duijn, Cornelia M, Spector, Timothy D, Rahi, Jugnoo S, Santos, Eugenio, Klaver, Caroline C W, Hammond, Christopher J·2010·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Myopia and hyperopia are at opposite ends of the continuum of refraction, the measure of the eye′s ability to focus light, which is an important cause of visual impairment (when aberrant) and is a highly heritable trait. We conducted a genome-wide association study for refractive error in 4,270 individuals from the TwinsUK cohort. We identified SNPs on 15q25 associated with refractive error (rs8027411, P = 7.91 × 10−8). We replicated this association in six adult cohorts of European ancestry with a combined 13,414 individuals (combined P = 2.07 × 10−9). This locus overlaps the transcription initiation site of RASGRF1, which is highly expressed in neurons and retina and has previously been implicated in retinal function and memory consolidation. Rasgrf1−/− mice show a heavier average crystalline lens (P = 0.001). The identification of a susceptibility locus for refractive error on 15q25 will be important in characterizing the molecular mechanism responsible for the most common cause of visual impairment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.664

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Hysi, P. G., Young, T. L., Mackey, D. A., Andrew, T., Fernández-Medarde, A., Solouki, A. M., Hewitt, A. W., Macgregor, S., Vingerling, J. R., Li, Y.-J., Ikram, M. K., Fai, L. Y., Sham, P. C., Manyes, L., Porteros, A., Lopes, M. C., Carbonaro, F., Fahy, S. J., Martin, N. G., van Duijn, C. M., Spector, T. D., Rahi, J. S., Santos, E., Klaver, C. C. W., & Hammond, C. J.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2010-09-12
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
902-905
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2025044344
Cited by
219
References
0
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genome-wide association study for myopia and refractive error identifies a susceptibility locus at 15q25. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.664
The paper
Hysi, P. G., Young, T. L., Mackey, D. A., Andrew, T., Fernández-Medarde, A., Solouki, A. M., Hewitt, A. W., Macgregor, S., Vingerling, J. R., Li, Y.-J., Ikram, M. K., Fai, L. Y., Sham, P. C., Manyes, L., Porteros, A., Lopes, M. C., Carbonaro, F., Fahy, S. J., Martin, N. G., . . . Hammond, C. J. (2010). A genome-wide association study for myopia and refractive error identifies a susceptibility locus at 15q25. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.664

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.