Cited by 189Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Identification and mapping of human cDNAs homologous to Drosophila mutant genes through EST database searching

Banfi, Sandro, Borsani, Giuseppe, Rossi, Elena, Bernard, Loris, Guffanti, Alessandro, Rubboli, Francesca, Marchitiello, Anna, Giglio, Sabrina +4 more·1996·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Cross-species comparison is an effective tool used to identify genes and study their function in both normal and pathological conditions. We have applied the power of Drosophila genetics to the vast resource of human cDNAs represented in the expressed sequence tag (EST) database (dbEST) to identify novel human genes of high biological interest. Sixty-six human cDNAs showing significant homology to genes causing Drosophila mutant phenotypes were identified by screening dbEST using the "text string' option, and their map position was determined using both fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and radiation hybrid mapping. Comparison between these genes and their putative partners in Drosophila may provide important insights into their function in mammals. Furthermore, integration of these genes into the transcription map of the human genome contributes to the positional candidate approach for disease gene identification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng0696-167

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banfi, S., Borsani, G., Rossi, E., Bernard, L., Guffanti, A., Rubboli, F., Marchitiello, A., Giglio, S., Coluccia, E., Zollo, M., Zuffardi, O., & Ballabio, A.
Affiliations
  • Telethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of Siena (IT)
Corresponding author
Ballabio, Andrea
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
1996-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
167-174
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2048764636
Cited by
189
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
human cDNA, cross-species comparison, expressed sequence tags, gene mapping, radiation hybrid mapping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, positional candidate genes, disease gene identification, gene homology
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Computer Communication Networks, Drosophila melanogaster, Humans, Hybrid Cells, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Phenotype, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Databases, Factual, Sequence Alignment, Genes, Insect, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, DNA, Complementary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review