Cited by 91High-pressure geophysics and materialsGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesSeismic Waves and Analysis

Reconciling the hemispherical structure of Earth’s inner core with its super-rotation

Waszek, Lauren, Irving, Jessica, Deuss, Arwen·2011·Nature Geoscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ngeo1083

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waszek, L., Irving, J., & Deuss, A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Waszek, Lauren
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Published
2011-02-20
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
264-267
ISSN
  • 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0908
OpenAlex
W2149359296
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Waves and Analysis
Keywords
Earth's inner core, seismic anisotropy, inner core growth, geodynamo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review