Cited by 521Geological formations and processesCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsCoastal and Marine Dynamics

Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene strata

Open access
Törnqvist, Torbjörn E., Wallace, Davin J., Storms, Joep E. A., Wallinga, Jakob, van Dam, Remke L., Blaauw, Martijn, Derksen, Mayke S., Klerks, Cornelis J. W. +2 more·2008·Nature Geoscience

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ngeo129

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Floodplain isolation has resulted in decreases in groundwater levels, soil consolidation, decomposition of organic materials that are no longer replenished, and agricultural activities such as grazing that can further compact the soil.

    “Floodplain isolation has resulted in decreases in groundwater levels, soil consolidation, decomposition of organic materials that are no longer replenished, and agricultural activities such as grazing that can further compact the soil (Cannon 2015;Tornqvist et al. 2008).”

    From Shallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System (2024) · cites this paper as Tornqvist et al. 2008

    The available copy contains a title about Holocene-strata compaction and bibliographic material, but no substantive passage addressing the effects of floodplain isolation. Searches for groundwater decline, organic-material decomposition, grazing, and soil consolidation found no passage establishing the claimed causal links. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Törnqvist, T. E., Wallace, D. J., Storms, J. E. A., Wallinga, J., van Dam, R. L., Blaauw, M., Derksen, M. S., Klerks, C. J. W., Meijneken, C., & Snijders, E. M. A.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Törnqvist, Torbjörn E.
  • Wallace, Davin J.
  • Storms, Joep E. A.
  • Wallinga, Jakob
  • Blaauw, Martijn
  • Derksen, Mayke S.
  • Klerks, Cornelis J. W.
  • Meijneken, Camiel
  • Snijders, Els M. A.
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Published
2008-02-17
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
173-176
ISSN
  • 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0908
OpenAlex
W2009721490
Cited by
521
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
FWCI
32.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Keywords
coastal subsidence, peat compaction, relative sea-level rise, Mississippi Delta, coastal Louisiana, Hurricane Katrina, coastal wetland loss, compaction rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review