The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance
Open accessAbstract
Desert dust aerosols affect Earth's global energy balance through interactions with radiation1,2, clouds3,4, and ecosystems5. But the magnitudes of these effects are so uncertain that it remains unclear whether atmospheric dust has a net warming or cooling effect on global climate1,4,6. Consequently, it is still uncertain whether large changes in atmospheric dust loading over the past century have slowed or accelerated anthropogenic climate change4,7-9, and the climate impact of possible future alterations in dust loading is similarly disputed9,10. Here we use an integrative analysis of dust aerosol sizes and abundance to constrain the climatic impact of dust through direct interactions with radiation. Using a combination of observational, experimental, and model data, we find that atmospheric dust is substantially coarser than represented in current climate models. Since coarse dust warms global climate, the dust direct radiative effect (DRE) is likely less cooling than the ~0.4 W/m2 estimated by models in a current ensemble2,11-13. We constrain the dust DRE to - 0.20 (-0.48 to +0.20) W/m2, which suggests that the dust DRE produces only about half the cooling that current models estimate, and raises the possibility that dust DRE is actually net warming the planet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence
Sherwood, S. C., Webb, M. J., Annan, J. D., Armour, K. C., Forster, P. M., Hargreaves, J. C., Hegerl, G., Klein, S. A., Marvel, K. D., Rohling, E. J., et al. (2020) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000678 · Cited by 1,254
Pyrogenic iron: the missing link to high iron solubility in aerosols
Ito, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Kanakidou, M., Mahowald, N. M., Scanza, R. A., Hamilton, D. S., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T., Sarin, M., Bikkina, S., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau7671 · Cited by 251
Self-citationConstraints on Paleoproterozoic atmospheric oxygen levels
Bellefroid, E. J., Hood, A. V. S., Hoffman, P. F., Thomas, M. D., Reinhard, C. T., & Planavsky, N. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1806216115 · Cited by 129
Vogel, A., Alessa, G., Scheele, R., Weber, L., Dubovik, O., North, P., & Fiedler, S. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035483 · Cited by 55
Simulating the Regional Impact of Dust on the Middle East Climate and the Red Sea
Osipov, S., & Stenchikov, G. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1002/2017jc013335 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kok, J. F., Ridley, D. A., Zhou, Q., Miller, R. L., Zhao, C., Heald, C. L., Ward, D. S., Albani, S., & Haustein, K.
- Venue
- Nature Geoscience
- Published
- 2017-03-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 274-278
- ISSN
- 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-0908
- OpenAlex
- W2595529991
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ngeo2912
- The paper
- Kok, J. F., Ridley, D. A., Zhou, Q., Miller, R. L., Zhao, C., Heald, C. L., Ward, D. S., Albani, S., & Haustein, K. (2017). Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance. Nature Geoscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.