The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balance between synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activity influences inclusions and neurotoxicity of mutant huntingtin
Open accessAbstract
Huntington's disease is caused by an expanded CAG repeat in the gene encoding huntingtin (HTT), resulting in loss of striatal and cortical neurons. Given that the gene product is widely expressed, it remains unclear why neurons are selectively targeted. Here we show the relationship between synaptic and extrasynaptic activity, inclusion formation of mutant huntingtin protein (mtHtt) and neuronal survival. Synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate–type glutamate receptor (NMDAR) activity induces mtHtt inclusions via a T complex-1 (TCP-1) ring complex (TRiC)-dependent mechanism, rendering neurons more resistant to mtHtt-mediated cell death. In contrast, stimulation of extrasynaptic NMDARs increases the vulnerability of mtHtt-containing neurons to cell death by impairing the neuroprotective cyclic AMP response element–binding protein (CREB)–peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) cascade and increasing the level of the small guanine nucleotide–binding protein Rhes, which is known to sumoylate and disaggregate mtHtt. Treatment of transgenic mice expressing a yeast artificial chromosome containing 128 CAG repeats (YAC128) with low-dose memantine blocks extrasynaptic (but not synaptic) NMDARs and ameliorates neuropathological and behavioral manifestations. By contrast, high-dose memantine, which blocks both extrasynaptic and synaptic NMDAR activity, decreases neuronal inclusions and worsens these outcomes. Our findings offer a rational therapeutic approach for protecting susceptible neurons in Huntington's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MACDONALD, M. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-e · Cited by 8,366
Inclusion body formation reduces levels of mutant huntingtin and the risk of neuronal death
Arrasate, M., Mitra, S., Schweitzer, E. S., Segal, M. R., & Finkbeiner, S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02998 · Cited by 1,979
Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways
Hardingham, G. E., Fukunaga, Y., & Bading, H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn835 · Cited by 1,686
Paradigm shift in neuroprotection by NMDA receptor blockade: memantine and beyond
Lipton, S. A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1958 · Cited by 909
Self-citationFibrillar amyloid deposition leads to local synaptic abnormalities and breakage of neuronal branches
Tsai, J., Grutzendler, J., Duff, K., & Gan, W.-B. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1335 · Cited by 561
Therapeutic Effects of Coenzyme Q10and Remacemide in Transgenic Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease
Ferrante, R. J., Andreassen, O. A., Dedeoglu, A., Ferrante, K. L., Jenkins, B. G., Hersch, S. M., & Beal, M. F. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-05-01592.2002 · Cited by 391
PGC-1α, a New Therapeutic Target in Huntington's Disease?
McGill, J. K., & Beal, M. F. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.023 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Huntington's disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment
Ross, C. A., & Tabrizi, S. J. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70245-3 · Cited by 1,743
Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders
Hardingham, G. E., & Bading, H. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2911 · Cited by 1,644
Excitotoxicity and stroke: Identifying novel targets for neuroprotection
Lai, T. W., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. T. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006 · Cited by 1,106
Excitotoxicity: Bridge to various triggers in neurodegenerative disorders
Mehta, A., Prabhakar, M., Kumar, P., Deshmukh, R., & Sharma, P. L. (2013) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.10.032 · Cited by 665
Kynurenines in the CNS: recent advances and new questions
Vécsei, L., Szalárdy, L., Fülöp, F., & Toldi, J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3793 · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Okamoto, S.-I., Pouladi, M. A., Talantova, M., Yao, D., Xia, P., Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Zaidi, R., Clemente, A., Kaul, M., Graham, R. K., Zhang, D., Vincent Chen, H.-S., Tong, G., Hayden, M. R., & Lipton, S. A.
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2009-11-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1407-1413
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W2027275070
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balance between synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activity influences inclusions and neurotoxicity of mutant huntingtin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nm.2056
- The paper
- Okamoto, S.-I., Pouladi, M. A., Talantova, M., Yao, D., Xia, P., Ehrnhoefer, D. E., Zaidi, R., Clemente, A., Kaul, M., Graham, R. K., Zhang, D., Vincent Chen, H.-S., Tong, G., Hayden, M. R., & Lipton, S. A. (2009). Balance between synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activity influences inclusions and neurotoxicity of mutant huntingtin. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.