The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A high-throughput drug screen for Entamoeba histolytica identifies a new lead and target
Open accessAbstract
Entamoeba histolytica, a protozoan intestinal parasite, is the causative agent of human amebiasis. Amebiasis is the fourth leading cause of death and the third leading cause of morbidity due to protozoan infections worldwide, resulting in ∼70,000 deaths annually. E. histolytica has been listed by the National Institutes of Health as a category B priority biodefense pathogen in the United States. Treatment relies on metronidazole, which has adverse effects, and potential resistance of E. histolytica to the drug is an increasing concern. To facilitate drug screening for this anaerobic protozoan, we developed and validated an automated, high-throughput screen (HTS). This screen identified auranofin, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug used therapeutically for rheumatoid arthritis, as active against E. histolytica in culture. Auranofin was ten times more potent against E. histolytica than metronidazole. Transcriptional profiling and thioredoxin reductase assays suggested that auranofin targets the E. histolytica thioredoxin reductase, preventing the reduction of thioredoxin and enhancing sensitivity of trophozoites to reactive oxygen-mediated killing. In a mouse model of amebic colitis and a hamster model of amebic liver abscess, oral auranofin markedly decreased the number of parasites, the detrimental host inflammatory response and hepatic damage. This new use of auranofin represents a promising therapy for amebiasis, and the drug has been granted orphan-drug status from the FDA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs
Ashburn, T. T., & Thor, K. B. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1468 · Cited by 3,237
Thioredoxin and Related Molecules–From Biology to Health and Disease
Lillig, C. H., & Holmgren, A. (2007) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2007.9.25 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Xu, M., Lee, E. M., Wen, Z., Cheng, Y., Huang, W.-K., Qian, X., TCW, J., Kouznetsova, J., Ogden, S. C., Hammack, C., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4184 · Cited by 641
Siles, S. A., Srinivasan, A., Pierce, C. G., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., & Ramasubramanian, A. K. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00680-13 · Cited by 120
Thangamani, S., Maland, M., Mohammad, H., Pascuzzi, P. E., Avramova, L., Koehler, C. M., Hazbun, T. R., & Seleem, M. N. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00004 · Cited by 90
Parasite-Produced MIF Cytokine: Role in Immune Evasion, Invasion, and Pathogenesis
Ghosh, S., Jiang, N., Farr, L., Ngobeni, R., & Moonah, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01995 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Debnath, A., Parsonage, D., Andrade, R. M., He, C., Cobo, E. R., Hirata, K., Chen, S., García-Rivera, G., Orozco, E., Martínez, M. B., Gunatilleke, S. S., Barrios, A. M., Arkin, M. R., Poole, L. B., McKerrow, J. H., & Reed, S. L.
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2012-05-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 956-960
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W2116106523
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.