Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 848

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx regulates neutrophil adhesion and lung injury during experimental sepsis

Open access
Schmidt, Eric P, Yang, Yimu, Janssen, William J, Gandjeva, Aneta, Perez, Mario J, Barthel, Lea, Zemans, Rachel L, Bowman, Joel C, Koyanagi, Dan E, Yunt, Zulma X, Smith, Lynelle P, Cheng, Sara S, Overdier, Katherine H, Thompson, Kathy R, Geraci, Mark W, Douglas, Ivor S, Pearse, David B, Tuder, Rubin M·2012·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Sepsis, a systemic inflammatory response to infection, commonly progresses to acute lung injury (ALI), an inflammatory lung disease with high morbidity. We postulated that sepsis-associated ALI is initiated by degradation of the pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx, leading to neutrophil adherence and inflammation. Using intravital microscopy, we found that endotoxemia in mice rapidly induced pulmonary microvascular glycocalyx degradation via tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-dependent mechanisms. Glycocalyx degradation involved the specific loss of heparan sulfate and coincided with activation of endothelial heparanase, a TNF-α–responsive, heparan sulfate–specific glucuronidase. Glycocalyx degradation increased the availability of endothelial surface adhesion molecules to circulating microspheres and contributed to neutrophil adhesion. Heparanase inhibition prevented endotoxemia-associated glycocalyx loss and neutrophil adhesion and, accordingly, attenuated sepsis-induced ALI and mortality in mice. These findings are potentially relevant to human disease, as sepsis-associated respiratory failure in humans was associated with higher plasma heparan sulfate degradation activity; moreover, heparanase content was higher in human lung biopsies showing diffuse alveolar damage than in normal human lung tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.2843

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 848

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, E. P., Yang, Y., Janssen, W. J., Gandjeva, A., Perez, M. J., Barthel, L., Zemans, R. L., Bowman, J. C., Koyanagi, D. E., Yunt, Z. X., Smith, L. P., Cheng, S. S., Overdier, K. H., Thompson, K. R., Geraci, M. W., Douglas, I. S., Pearse, D. B., & Tuder, R. M.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2012-07-22
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1217-1223
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2111766323
Cited by
848
References
2
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.