Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fetal brain lesions after subcutaneous inoculation of Zika virus in a pregnant nonhuman primate

Open access
Adams Waldorf, Kristina M, Stencel-Baerenwald, Jennifer E, Kapur, Raj P, Studholme, Colin, Boldenow, Erica, Vornhagen, Jay, Baldessari, Audrey, Dighe, Manjiri K, Thiel, Jeff, Merillat, Sean, Armistead, Blair, Tisoncik-Go, Jennifer, Green, Richard R, Davis, Michael A, Dewey, Elyse C, Fairgrieve, Marian R, Gatenby, J Christopher, Richards, Todd, Garden, Gwenn A, Diamond, Michael S, Juul, Sandra E, Grant, Richard F, Kuller, LaRene, Shaw, Dennis W W, Ogle, Jason, Gough, G Michael, Lee, Wonsok, English, Chris, Hevner, Robert F, Dobyns, William B, Gale, Michael, Rajagopal, Lakshmi·2016·Nature Medicine
DOI 10.1038/nm.4193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We describe the development of fetal brain lesions after Zika virus (ZIKV) inoculation in a pregnant pigtail macaque. Periventricular lesions developed within 10 d and evolved asymmetrically in the occipital–parietal lobes. Fetal autopsy revealed ZIKV in the brain and significant cerebral white matter hypoplasia, periventricular white matter gliosis, and axonal and ependymal injury. Our observation of ZIKV-associated fetal brain lesions in a nonhuman primate provides a model for therapeutic evaluation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.4193

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Adams Waldorf, K. M., Stencel-Baerenwald, J. E., Kapur, R. P., Studholme, C., Boldenow, E., Vornhagen, J., Baldessari, A., Dighe, M. K., Thiel, J., Merillat, S., Armistead, B., Tisoncik-Go, J., Green, R. R., Davis, M. A., Dewey, E. C., Fairgrieve, M. R., Gatenby, J. C., Richards, T., Garden, G. A., Diamond, M. S., Juul, S. E., Grant, R. F., Kuller, L., Shaw, D. W. W., Ogle, J., Gough, G. M., Lee, W., English, C., Hevner, R. F., Dobyns, W. B., Gale, M., & Rajagopal, L.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-09-12
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
1256-1259
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
DOI
10.1038/nm.4193
OpenAlex
W2519646798
Cited by
262
References
4
FWCI
47.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fetal brain lesions after subcutaneous inoculation of Zika virus in a pregnant nonhuman primate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nm.4193
The paper
Adams Waldorf, K. M., Stencel-Baerenwald, J. E., Kapur, R. P., Studholme, C., Boldenow, E., Vornhagen, J., Baldessari, A., Dighe, M. K., Thiel, J., Merillat, S., Armistead, B., Tisoncik-Go, J., Green, R. R., Davis, M. A., Dewey, E. C., Fairgrieve, M. R., Gatenby, J. C., Richards, T., Garden, G. A., . . . Rajagopal, L. (2016). Fetal brain lesions after subcutaneous inoculation of Zika virus in a pregnant nonhuman primate. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4193

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.