Cited by 395Rheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesVibration Control and Rheological Fluids

Generality of shear thickening in dense suspensions

Open access
Brown, Eric, Forman, Nicole A., Orellana, Carlos S., Zhang, Hanjun, Maynor, Benjamin W., Betts, Douglas E., DeSimone, Joseph M., Jaeger, Heinrich M.·2010·Nature Materials

Abstract

Suspensions are of wide interest and form the basis for many smart fluids. For most suspensions, the viscosity decreases with increasing shear rate, that is, they shear thin. Few are reported to do the opposite, that is, shear thicken, despite the longstanding expectation that shear thickening is a generic type of suspension behaviour. Here we resolve this apparent contradiction. We demonstrate that shear thickening can be masked by a yield stress and can be recovered when the yield stress is decreased below a threshold. We show the generality of this argument and quantify the threshold in rheology experiments where we control yield stresses arising from a variety of sources, such as attractions from particle surface interactions, induced dipoles from applied electric and magnetic fields, as well as confinement of hard particles at high packing fractions. These findings open up possibilities for the design of smart suspensions that combine shear thickening with electro- or magnetorheological response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmat2627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Speed-dependent behaviors can be dictated simply by the bifurcation geometry of the metamaterial.

    “While such complex speed-dependent phenomena are actively studied in materials (e.g., cornstarch46,47), our approach suggests that speed-dependent behaviors can be dictated simply by the bifurcation geometry of the metamaterial.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, E., Forman, N. A., Orellana, C. S., Zhang, H., Maynor, B. W., Betts, D. E., DeSimone, J. M., & Jaeger, H. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Liquidia Technologies (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Eric
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2010-01-31
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
220-224
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W2067187440
Cited by
395
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Keywords
shear thickening, concentrated suspensions, yield stress, smart fluids, particle interactions, induced dipoles, confinement effects, packing density, suspension rheology, shear-thinning fluids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review