The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast, high-contrast imaging of animal development with scanned light sheet–based structured-illumination microscopy
Open accessAbstract
Recording light-microscopy images of large, nontransparent specimens, such as developing multicellular organisms, is complicated by decreased contrast resulting from light scattering. Early zebrafish development can be captured by standard light-sheet microscopy, but new imaging strategies are required to obtain high-quality data of late development or of less transparent organisms. We combined digital scanned laser light-sheet fluorescence microscopy with incoherent structured-illumination microscopy (DSLM-SI) and created structured-illumination patterns with continuously adjustable frequencies. Our method discriminates the specimen-related scattered background from signal fluorescence, thereby removing out-of-focus light and optimizing the contrast of in-focus structures. DSLM-SI provides rapid control of the illumination pattern, exceptional imaging quality and high imaging speeds. We performed long-term imaging of zebrafish development for 58 h and fast multiple-view imaging of early Drosophila melanogaster development. We reconstructed cell positions over time from the Drosophila DSLM-SI data and created a fly digital embryo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration*
Richardson, W. H. (1972) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.62.000055 · Cited by 4,160
Cited by
Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues
Tomer, R., Ye, L., Hsueh, B., & Deisseroth, K. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.123 · Cited by 842
CLARITY for mapping the nervous system
Chung, K., & Deisseroth, K. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2481 · Cited by 747
Deep and fast live imaging with two-photon scanned light-sheet microscopy
Truong, T. V., Supatto, W., Koos, D. S., Choi, J. M., & Fraser, S. E. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1652 · Cited by 489
Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy: A Review
Santi, P. A. (2011) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1369/0022155410394857 · Cited by 431
Light-sheet microscopy: a tutorial
Olarte, O. E., Andilla, J., Gualda, E. J., & Loza-Alvarez, P. (2018) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.10.000111 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Keller, P. J., Schmidt, A. D., Santella, A., Khairy, K., Bao, Z., Wittbrodt, J., & Stelzer, E. H. K.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2010-07-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 637-642
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2050721997
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.