Cited by 842Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues

Open access
Tomer, Raju, Ye, Li, Hsueh, Brian, Deisseroth, Karl·2014·Nature Protocols

Abstract

CLARITY is a method for chemical transformation of intact biological tissues into a hydrogel-tissue hybrid, which becomes amenable to interrogation with light and macromolecular labels while retaining fine structure and native biological molecules. This emerging accessibility of information from large intact samples has created both new opportunities and new challenges. Here we describe protocols spanning multiple dimensions of the CLARITY workflow, ranging from simple, reliable and efficient lipid removal without electrophoretic instrumentation (passive CLARITY) to optimized objectives and integration with light-sheet optics (CLARITY-optimized light-sheet microscopy (COLM)) for accelerating data collection from clarified samples by several orders of magnitude while maintaining or increasing quality and resolution. The entire protocol takes from 7-28 d to complete for an adult mouse brain, including hydrogel embedding, full lipid removal, whole-brain antibody staining (which, if needed, accounts for 7-10 of the days), and whole-brain high-resolution imaging; timing within this window depends on the choice of lipid removal options, on the size of the tissue, and on the number and type of immunostaining rounds performed. This protocol has been successfully applied to the study of adult mouse, adult zebrafish and adult human brains, and it may find many other applications in the structural and molecular analysis of large assembled biological systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2014.123

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When coupled with two-photon or light-sheet laser microscopy, whole mouse brains can be imaged entirely intact with sub-cellular resolution.

    “When coupled with two-photon or light-sheet laser microscopy, whole mouse brains can be imaged entirely intact with sub-cellular resolution (Tomer et al., 2014).”

    From The role of myelination in measures of white matter integrity: Combination of diffusion tensor imaging and two-photon microscopy of CLARITY intact brains (2017) · cites this paper as Tomer et al., 2014

    The Overview of procedure and Anticipated Results (page unavailable) report high-resolution imaging through an intact mouse brain and whole-brain imaging with CLARITY-optimized light-sheet microscopy. The paper does not demonstrate whole-brain imaging with two-photon microscopy or establish sub-cellular resolution throughout the whole brain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Virus-mediated neuronal tract-tracing combined with CLARITY-optimized light-sheet microscopy revealed complete interruption of corticospinal tract fibres and pronounced depletion of glutamatergic reticulospinal fibres below the injury.

    “Virus-mediated neuronal tract-tracing combined with CLARITY-optimized light-sheet microscopy23 revealed the complete interruption of corticospinal tract fibres and pronounced depletion of glutamatergic reticulospinal fibres below the injury (Fig. 1e and Extended Data Fig. 2a).”

    From The neurons that restore walking after paralysis (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomer, R., Ye, L., Hsueh, B., & Deisseroth, K.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Deisseroth, Karl
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2014-06-19
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
1682-1697
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2010114799
Cited by
842
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 11
FWCI
51.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020016)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R37DA035377)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
clarity, tissue clearing, lipid removal, light-sheet microscopy, whole-brain imaging, antibody staining, mouse brain, zebrafish brain, human brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Microscopy, Tissue Embedding, Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate, Mice, Optics and Photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review