Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 709

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A microfluidic device for label-free, physical capture of circulating tumor cell clusters

Open access
Sarioglu, A Fatih, Aceto, Nicola, Kojic, Nikola, Donaldson, Maria C, Zeinali, Mahnaz, Hamza, Bashar, Engstrom, Amanda, Zhu, Huili, Sundaresan, Tilak K, Miyamoto, David T, Luo, Xi, Bardia, Aditya, Wittner, Ben S, Ramaswamy, Sridhar, Shioda, Toshi, Ting, David T, Stott, Shannon L, Kapur, Ravi, Maheswaran, Shyamala, Haber, Daniel A, Toner, Mehmet·2015·Nature Methods

Abstract

Cancer cells metastasize through the bloodstream either as single migratory circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or as multicellular groupings (CTC clusters). Existing technologies for CTC enrichment are designed to isolate single CTCs, and although CTC clusters are detectable in some cases, their true prevalence and significance remain to be determined. Here we developed a microchip technology (the Cluster-Chip) to capture CTC clusters independently of tumor-specific markers from unprocessed blood. CTC clusters are isolated through specialized bifurcating traps under low–shear stress conditions that preserve their integrity, and even two-cell clusters are captured efficiently. Using the Cluster-Chip, we identified CTC clusters in 30–40% of patients with metastatic breast or prostate cancer or with melanoma. RNA sequencing of CTC clusters confirmed their tumor origin and identified tissue-derived macrophages within the clusters. Efficient capture of CTC clusters will enable the detailed characterization of their biological properties and role in metastasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.3404

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 709

Metadata

Authors
Sarioglu, A. F., Aceto, N., Kojic, N., Donaldson, M. C., Zeinali, M., Hamza, B., Engstrom, A., Zhu, H., Sundaresan, T. K., Miyamoto, D. T., Luo, X., Bardia, A., Wittner, B. S., Ramaswamy, S., Shioda, T., Ting, D. T., Stott, S. L., Kapur, R., Maheswaran, S., Haber, D. A., & Toner, M.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2015-05-18
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
685-691
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1835655851
Cited by
709
References
36
FWCI
42.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A microfluidic device for label-free, physical capture of circulating tumor cell clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmeth.3404
The paper
Sarioglu, A. F., Aceto, N., Kojic, N., Donaldson, M. C., Zeinali, M., Hamza, B., Engstrom, A., Zhu, H., Sundaresan, T. K., Miyamoto, D. T., Luo, X., Bardia, A., Wittner, B. S., Ramaswamy, S., Shioda, T., Ting, D. T., Stott, S. L., Kapur, R., Maheswaran, S., . . . Toner, M. (2015). A microfluidic device for label-free, physical capture of circulating tumor cell clusters. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.