Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ProteomeBinders: planning a European resource of affinity reagents for analysis of the human proteome

Open access
Taussig, Michael J, Stoevesandt, Oda, Borrebaeck, Carl A K, Bradbury, Andrew R, Cahill, Dolores, Cambillau, Christian, de Daruvar, Antoine, Dübel, Stefan, Eichler, Jutta, Frank, Ronald, Gibson, Toby J, Gloriam, David, Gold, Larry, Herberg, Friedrich W, Hermjakob, Henning, Hoheisel, Jörg D, Joos, Thomas O, Kallioniemi, Olli, Koegl, Manfred, Konthur, Zoltán, Korn, Bernhard, Kremmer, Elisabeth, Krobitsch, Sylvia, Landegren, Ulf, van der Maarel, Silvère, McCafferty, John, Muyldermans, Serge, Nygren, Per-Åke, Palcy, Sandrine, Plückthun, Andreas, Polic, Bojan, Przybylski, Michael, Saviranta, Petri, Sawyer, Alan, Sherman, David J, Skerra, Arne, Templin, Markus, Ueffing, Marius, Uhlén, Mathias·2007·Nature Methods

Abstract

ProteomeBinders is a new European consortium aiming to establish a comprehensive resource of well-characterized affinity reagents, including but not limited to antibodies, for analysis of the human proteome. Given the huge diversity of the proteome, the scale of the project is potentially immense but nevertheless feasible in the context of a pan-European or even worldwide coordination. NOTE: In the version of the article originally published, Manfred Koegl’s name was misspelled. Additionally, Zoltan Konthur's affiliation was listed incorrectly; it should be Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany. These errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth0107-13

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Taussig, M. J., Stoevesandt, O., Borrebaeck, C. A. K., Bradbury, A. R., Cahill, D., Cambillau, C., de Daruvar, A., Dübel, S., Eichler, J., Frank, R., Gibson, T. J., Gloriam, D., Gold, L., Herberg, F. W., Hermjakob, H., Hoheisel, J. D., Joos, T. O., Kallioniemi, O., Koegl, M., Konthur, Z., Korn, B., Kremmer, E., Krobitsch, S., Landegren, U., van der Maarel, S., McCafferty, J., Muyldermans, S., Nygren, P.-Å., Palcy, S., Plückthun, A., Polic, B., Przybylski, M., Saviranta, P., Sawyer, A., Sherman, D. J., Skerra, A., Templin, M., Ueffing, M., & Uhlén, M.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
13-17
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2159847871
Cited by
236
References
3
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ProteomeBinders: planning a European resource of affinity reagents for analysis of the human proteome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmeth0107-13
The paper
Taussig, M. J., Stoevesandt, O., Borrebaeck, C. A. K., Bradbury, A. R., Cahill, D., Cambillau, C., de Daruvar, A., Dübel, S., Eichler, J., Frank, R., Gibson, T. J., Gloriam, D., Gold, L., Herberg, F. W., Hermjakob, H., Hoheisel, J. D., Joos, T. O., Kallioniemi, O., Koegl, M., . . . Uhlén, M. (2007). ProteomeBinders: planning a European resource of affinity reagents for analysis of the human proteome. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0107-13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.