The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MicrobeJ, a tool for high throughput bacterial cell detection and quantitative analysis
Open accessAbstract
Single-cell analysis of bacteria and subcellular protein localization dynamics has shown that bacteria have elaborate life cycles, cytoskeletal protein networks and complex signal transduction pathways driven by localized proteins. The volume of multidimensional images generated in such experiments and the computation time required to detect, associate and track cells and subcellular features pose considerable challenges, especially for high-throughput experiments. There is therefore a need for a versatile, computationally efficient image analysis tool capable of extracting the desired relationships from images in a meaningful and unbiased way. Here, we present MicrobeJ, a plug-in for the open-source platform ImageJ1. MicrobeJ provides a comprehensive framework to process images derived from a wide variety of microscopy experiments with special emphasis on large image sets. It performs the most common intensity and morphology measurements as well as customized detection of poles, septa, fluorescent foci and organelles, determines their subcellular localization with subpixel resolution, and tracks them over time. Because a dynamic link is maintained between the images, measurements and all data representations derived from them, the editor and suite of advanced data presentation tools facilitates the image analysis process and provides a robust way to verify the accuracy and veracity of the data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Cited by
The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function
Tropini, C., Earle, K. A., Huang, K. C., & Sonnenburg, J. L. (2017) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.010 · Cited by 685
Moger-Reischer, R. Z., Glass, J. I., Wise, K. S., Sun, L., Bittencourt, D. M. C., Lehmkuhl, B. K., Schoolmaster, D. R., Lynch, M., & Lennon, J. T. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06288-x · Cited by 116
de Wet, T. J., Winkler, K. R., Mhlanga, M., Mizrahi, V., & Warner, D. F. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.60083 · Cited by 79
Lonergan, Z. R., Nairn, B. L., Wang, J., Hsu, Y.-P., Hesse, L. E., Beavers, W. N., Chazin, W. J., Trinidad, J. C., VanNieuwenhze, M. S., Giedroc, D. P., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.089 · Cited by 76
Live-cell imaging powered by computation
Shroff, H., Testa, I., Jug, F., & Manley, S. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00702-6 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Ducret, A., Quardokus, E. M., & Brun, Y. V.
- Venue
- Nature Microbiology
- Published
- 2016-06-20
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 16077-16077
- ISSN
- 2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2467964007
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.