Cited by 243Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Requirement for COUP-TFI and II in the temporal specification of neural stem cells in CNS development

Naka, Hayato, Nakamura, Shiho, Shimazaki, Takuya, Okano, Hideyuki·2008·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

In the developing CNS, subtypes of neurons and glial cells are generated according to a schedule that is defined by cell-intrinsic mechanisms that function at the progenitor-cell level. However, no critical molecular switch for the temporal specification of CNS progenitor cells has been identified. We found that chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor I and II (Coup-tfI and Coup-tfII, also known as Nr2f1 and Nr2f2) are required for the temporal specification of neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs), including their acquisition of gliogenic competence, as demonstrated by their responsiveness to gliogenic cytokines. COUP-TFI and II are transiently co-expressed in the ventricular zone of the early embryonic CNS. The double knockdown of Coup-tfI/II in embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived NSPCs and the developing mouse forebrain caused sustained neurogenesis and the prolonged generation of early-born neurons. These findings reveal a part of the timer mechanisms for generating diverse types of neurons and glial cells during CNS development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nr2f1 and Nr2f2 influence neuronal specification by regulating cell cycle dynamics, which may explain why cell cycle factors have been implicated in interneuron diversity.

    “Nr2f1 and Nr2f2 influence neuronal specification by regulating cell cycle dynamics”

    From Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons (2018) · cites this paper as Naka et al., 2008

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 243

Authors
Naka, H., Nakamura, S., Shimazaki, T., & Okano, H.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Shimazaki, Takuya
  • Okano, Hideyuki
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2008-08-24
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1014-1023
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1977879168
Cited by
243
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
COUP-TFI, NR2F1, NR2F2, transcriptional repressor, neural stem/progenitor cells, temporal specifications, neurogenesis, gliogenesis, central nervous system development, ventricular zone, embryonic stem cell-derived neurons, forebrain
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Central Nervous System, Embryo, Mammalian, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Mice, Inbred ICR, Mutation, Neuroglia, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Stem Cells, Time Factors, Transfection, Tubulin, Cytokines, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, RNA, Small Interfering, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, COUP Transcription Factor II, COUP Transcription Factor I, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review