The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates
Open accessAbstract
There is no generally accepted account of the function of the second visual cortical area (V2), partly because no simple response properties robustly distinguish V2 neurons from those in primary visual cortex (V1). We constructed synthetic stimuli replicating the higher-order statistical dependencies found in natural texture images and used them to stimulate macaque V1 and V2 neurons. Most V2 cells responded more vigorously to these textures than to control stimuli lacking naturalistic structure; V1 cells did not. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements in humans revealed differences between V1 and V2 that paralleled the neuronal measurements. The ability of human observers to detect naturalistic structure in different types of texture was well predicted by the strength of neuronal and fMRI responses in V2 but not in V1. Together, these results reveal a particular functional role for V2 in the representation of natural image structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R., & Tank, D. W. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868 · Cited by 6,483
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767
Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion
Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000284 · Cited by 3,442
The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194544 · Cited by 2,358
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906
Self-citationA Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026553619983 · Cited by 1,806
Self-citationObject-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex.
Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., Ledden, P. J., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., & Tootell, R. B. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8135 · Cited by 1,761
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Observer Error-Rates Using the EM Algorithm
Dawid, A. P., & Skene, A. M. (1979) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346806 · Cited by 1,692
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-dependent oxygenation
Ogawa, S. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,367
Visual field maps in human cortex.
Wandell, B. A., Dumoulin, S. O., & Brewer, A. A. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012 · Cited by 1,231
Cited by
Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain
Kriegeskorte, N., & Kievit, R. A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.007 · Cited by 911
Seeing it all: Convolutional network layers map the function of the human visual system
Eickenberg, M., Gramfort, A., Varoquaux, G., & Thirion, B. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.001 · Cited by 338
With or without you: predictive coding and Bayesian inference in the brain
Aitchison, L., & Lengyel, M. (2017) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.08.010 · Cited by 308
Integrative benchmarking to advance neurally mechanistic models of human intelligence
Schrimpf, M., Kubilius, J., Lee, M. J., Ratan Murty, N. A., Ajemian, R., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.040 · Cited by 233
Improving the accuracy of single-trial fMRI response estimates using GLMsingle
Prince, J. S., Charest, I., Kurzawski, J. W., Pyles, J. A., Tarr, M. J., & Kay, K. N. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77599 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, J., Ziemba, C. M., Heeger, D. J., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-05-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 974-981
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W1992480897
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nn.3402
- The paper
- Freeman, J., Ziemba, C. M., Heeger, D. J., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (2013). A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
