Cited by 207Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMotor Control and AdaptationIon Channels and Receptors

Edge-orientation processing in first-order tactile neurons

Pruszynski, J Andrew, Johansson, Roland S·2014·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

A fundamental feature of first-order neurons in the tactile system is that their distal axon branches in the skin and forms many transduction sites, yielding complex receptive fields with many highly sensitive zones. We found that this arrangement constitutes a peripheral neural mechanism that allows individual neurons to signal geometric features of touched objects. Specifically, we observed that two types of first-order tactile neurons that densely innervate the glabrous skin of the human fingertips signaled edge orientation via both the intensity and the temporal structure of their responses. Moreover, we found that the spatial layout of a neuron's highly sensitive zones predicted its sensitivity to particular edge orientations. We submit that peripheral neurons in the touch-processing pathway, as with peripheral neurons in the visual-processing pathway, perform feature extraction computations that are typically attributed to neurons in the cerebral cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3804

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain key features of the object, such as the presence and orientation of edges, are enhanced at the periphery due to skin mechanics and the geometry of the receptive fields.

    “Certain key features of the object, for example the presence and orientation of edges, are enhanced at the periphery due to skin mechanics (Fig. 4A) (Phillips and Johnson, 1981;Sripati et al., 2006) and the geometry of the receptive fields (Pruszynski and Johansson, 2014).”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Pruszynski and Johansson, 2014

  • Receptive fields of type I afferents are not uniform but contain several individual subfields or hot spots in both glabrous and hairy skin.

    “The reasoning above ignores the fact that receptive fields of type I afferents are not uniform but contain several individual subfields or hot spots, as demonstrated in both glabrous (Johansson 1978;Pruszynski and Johansson 2014) and hairy skin (Vallbo et al. 1995).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Pruszynski and Johansson 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pruszynski, J. A., & Johansson, R. S.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Pruszynski, J Andrew
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2014-08-31
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1404-1409
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2091789155
Cited by
207
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • University of Tennessee Space Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
edge orientation, receptive fields, dendritic branching, glabrous skin, feature extraction, temporal coding, intensity coding, object shape perception
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Afferent Pathways, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Neurons, Orientation, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Somatosensory Cortex, Time Factors, Touch, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review