Focusing the research efforts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers early on realized that the immense number of newly developed nanomaterials would make classical in vivo animal tests impossible due to time, money, and number of animals required.
“This is mainly due to the fact that researchers early on realized that the immense number of newly developed nanomaterials would make it impossible to perform classical in vivo animal tests due to the amount of time, money, and number of animals required (Hartung and Sabbioni, 2011; Schrurs and Lison, 2012; Guggenheim et al., 2018).”
From In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards (2019) · cites this paper as Schrurs and Lison, 2012
Cites
Nanotoxicology: An Interdisciplinary Challenge
Krug, H. F., & Wick, P. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001037 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mendes, B. B., Conniot, J., Avital, A., Yao, D., Jiang, X., Zhou, X., Sharf-Pauker, N., Xiao, Y., Adir, O., Liang, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00104-y · Cited by 719 · see citing works
In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards
Hirsch, C., & Schildknecht, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01484 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schrurs, F., & Lison, D.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Lison, Dominique
- ORCID
- Lison, Dominique
- Venue
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2012-08-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 546-548
- ISSN
- 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3395
- OpenAlex
- W2159482595
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- nanotoxicology, research coordination, stakeholder engagement, research structure, nanomaterial safety
- MeSH terms
- Cells, Environment, Humans, Toxicology, Nanotechnology, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
