Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 661

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device

Open access
Muhonen, Juha T., Dehollain, Juan P., Laucht, Arne, Hudson, Fay E., Kalra, Rachpon, Sekiguchi, Takeharu, Itoh, Kohei M., Jamieson, David N., McCallum, Jeffrey C., Dzurak, Andrew S., Morello, Andrea·2014·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

The spin of an electron or a nucleus in a semiconductor naturally implements the unit of quantum information--the qubit. In addition, because semiconductors are currently used in the electronics industry, developing qubits in semiconductors would be a promising route to realize scalable quantum information devices. The solid-state environment, however, may provide deleterious interactions between the qubit and the nuclear spins of surrounding atoms, or charge and spin fluctuations arising from defects in oxides and interfaces. For materials such as silicon, enrichment of the spin-zero (28)Si isotope drastically reduces spin-bath decoherence. Experiments on bulk spin ensembles in (28)Si crystals have indeed demonstrated extraordinary coherence times. However, it remained unclear whether these would persist at the single-spin level, in gated nanostructures near amorphous interfaces. Here, we present the coherent operation of individual (31)P electron and nuclear spin qubits in a top-gated nanostructure, fabricated on an isotopically engineered (28)Si substrate. The (31)P nuclear spin sets the new benchmark coherence time (>30 s with Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence) of any single qubit in the solid state and reaches >99.99% control fidelity. The electron spin CPMG coherence time exceeds 0.5 s, and detailed noise spectroscopy indicates that--contrary to widespread belief--it is not limited by the proximity to an interface. Instead, decoherence is probably dominated by thermal and magnetic noise external to the device, and is thus amenable to further improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nnano.2014.211

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 661

Metadata

Authors
Muhonen, J. T., Dehollain, J. P., Laucht, A., Hudson, F. E., Kalra, R., Sekiguchi, T., Itoh, K. M., Jamieson, D. N., McCallum, J. C., Dzurak, A. S., & Morello, A.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2014-10-12
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
986-991
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2039375852
Cited by
661
References
0
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nnano.2014.211
The paper
Muhonen, J. T., Dehollain, J. P., Laucht, A., Hudson, F. E., Kalra, R., Sekiguchi, T., Itoh, K. M., Jamieson, D. N., McCallum, J. C., Dzurak, A. S., & Morello, A. (2014). Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.