Quantum sensing
Open accessAbstract
Quantum technologies are increasingly driving the field of precision metrology. While current techniques for sensing and recording time rely on classical devices, quantum sensors exploit quantum systems to reach unprecedented levels of precision. The working part of the sensor contains one or a few qubits, and resources like quantum entanglement are chosen and tailored to maximize sensitivity. This review introduces quantum sensing from the perspective of working experimentalists, with specific sensor implementations, concepts and methods, and recent developments.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review introduces quantum sensing as the use of quantum systems, coherence, or entanglement to measure physical quantities, focusing on qubit-based sensors and practical protocols. It synthesizes definitions, experimental platforms, sensing sequences, sensitivity limits, noise spectroscopy, adaptive methods, and entanglement-enhanced approaches.
Key findings
- Quantum sensing is defined by three uses: a quantum object to measure a quantity, quantum coherence for measurement, and entanglement to improve sensitivity beyond classical limits; a useful quantum sensor needs discrete levels, initialization/readout, coherent manipulation, and coupling to a signal \(V(t)\).
- The basic protocol is initialization, interaction with the signal, readout, and estimation; Ramsey and Rabi measurements illustrate static and resonant detection, while slope detection operates at \(p_0=0.5\) and variance detection at \(p_0=0\) or \(1\). Sensitivity improves with larger coupling \(\gamma\) and longer decoherence/relaxation time \(T_\chi\), with optimum sensing time near \(t \approx T_\chi\).
- Reported sensitivities include atomic vapor magnetometers at \(100\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) approaching \(<10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), SQUIDs down to \(10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), trapped ions at \(4.6\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), NV ensembles currently limited to \(\sim 1\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), and superconducting qubit magnetic sensing at \(3.3\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) at 10 MHz.
- Advanced methods include multipulse AC sensing with CP/PDD sequences, noise spectroscopy via filter functions and relaxometry, adaptive phase estimation achieving dynamic range scaling \(DR \propto T\), and entangled GHZ/N00N/squeezed states that can reach Heisenberg-limited sensitivity but often lose their advantage due to increased decoherence.
Methods
- This is a review article, not a primary experimental or theoretical study; it synthesizes principles, methods, and concepts of quantum sensing from an experimentalist’s viewpoint.
- It surveys implementations including neutral atoms, trapped ions, Rydberg atoms, atomic clocks, solid-state spins, superconducting circuits, elementary particle qubits, single electron transistors, optomechanics, and photons.
- The main analysis uses Hamiltonian formalism, Ramsey/Rabi examples, filter functions, the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, and summary tables of sensor implementations and symbols.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: the review mostly considers qubits, does not cover implementations in specific detail, excludes atomic clocks and photon-based sensors, and treats theory only up to the point needed to introduce key concepts.
- Paper-stated: entanglement-enhanced sensing is limited because GHZ states suffer faster decoherence, and N00N states are fragile and have small dynamic range.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it reports no primary data, and its numerical sensitivities are drawn from cited prior work; many equations appear as “formula-not-decoded” in the supplied text, so exact expressions cannot be verified from this text alone.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 207 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum sensors · p. 3
Many properties of more complex quantum systems can be modeled through a qubit sensor.
“The focus on two-level systems (1) is not a severe restriction because many properties of more complex quantum systems can be modeled through a qubit sensor (Goldstein et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldstein et al. , 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Neutral atoms as magnetic field sensors · p. 4
Alkali atoms are suitable sensing qubits fulfilling the definitions of quantum sensing.
“Alkali atoms are suitable sensing qubits fulfilling the above definitions (Kitching et al. , 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kitching et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 5
Trapped atoms have been employed to detect and image magnetic fields at the microscale.
“Trapped atoms have been employed to detect and image magnetic fields at the microscale, by replicating Larmor precession spectroscopy on a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate (Vengalattore et al. , 2007) and by direct driving of spin-flip transitions by microwave currents (Ockeloen et al. , 2013) or thermal radiofrequency noise in samples (Fortagh et al. , 2002; Jones et al. , 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Vengalattore et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ockeloen et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fortagh et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
The most advanced applications of trapped ions employ quantized motional levels as sensing qubits for electric fields and forces.
“The most advanced applications employ the quantized motional levels as sensing qubits for electric fields and forces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6
Rydberg states have become accessible in atomic vapour cells.
“Recently, Rydberg states have become accessible in atomic vapour cells (K¨ ubler et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kübler et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Electrical field noise is a key limiting factor in ultrasensitive force microscopy.
“Electrical field noise is a severe source of decoherence for ion traps and superconducting quantum processors (Labaziewicz et al. , 2008) and a key limiting factor in ultrasensitive force microscopy (Kuehn et al. , 2006; Tao and Degen, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kuehn et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tao and Degen, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantum sensors · p. 4
The sensitivity of a quantum sensor scales with the transduction parameter γ and the decoherence or relaxation time Tχ.
“In Section V, we will see that the sensitivity scales as”
- Also stated in: § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4 · plain
“where γ is the above transduction parameter and T χ is a decoherence or relaxation time that reflects the immunity of the quantum sensor against noise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4 · plain
- Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4
Relaxation and coherence times of spins in atomic vapors can be pushed to the second to minute range.
“This is owing to the surprising fact that relaxation and coherence times of spins in atomic vapors can be pushed to the second to minute range (Balabas et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balabas et al. , 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
The use of trapped ions in practical applications has proven difficult.
“Their use in practical applications, however, has proven difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4
In the simplest implementation, a thermal vapor of atoms serves as a quantum sensor for magnetic fields.
“In the simplest implementation, a thermal vapor of atoms serves as a quantum sensor for magnetic fields (Budker and Romalis, 2007; Kominis et al. , 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Budker and Romalis, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kominis et al. , 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Neutral atoms as magnetic field sensors · p. 4
The ground state spin of alkali atoms can be both prepared and read out optically by the strong spin-selective optical dipole transition linking their s-wave electronic ground state to the first (p-wave) excited state.
“Their ground state spin - a coupled angular momentum of electron and nuclear spin - can be both prepared and read out optically by the strong spin-selective optical dipole transition linking their s-wave electronic ground state to the first (p-wave) excited state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kitching et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 6
Spin squeezing has improved the sensitivity of magnetometry devices beyond the shot noise limit.
“It has improved the sensitivity of magnetometry devices beyond the shot noise limit (Ockeloen et al. , 2013; Sewell et al. , 2012) and has increased their bandwidth (Shah et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ockeloen et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sewell et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Electrical field noise is a severe source of decoherence for ion traps and superconducting quantum processors.
“Electrical field noise is a severe source of decoherence for ion traps and superconducting quantum processors (Labaziewicz et al. , 2008) and a key limiting factor in ultrasensitive force microscopy (Kuehn et al. , 2006; Tao and Degen, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Labaziewicz et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4
Vapor cells promise complementary access to high-energy physics, detecting anomalous dipole moments from coupling to exotic elementary particles and background fields beyond the standard model.
“Vapor cells also promise complementary access to high-energy physics, detecting anomalous dipole moments from coupling to exotic elementary particles and background fields beyond the standard model (Pustelny et al. , 2013; Smiciklas et al. , 2011; Swallows et al. , 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pustelny et al. , 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smiciklas et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Swallows et al. , 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Trapped ions have demonstrated magnetic sensitivities down to 4.6 pT/√Hz.
“Being an extremely clean system, trapped ions have demonstrated sensitivities down to 4 . 6 pT / √ Hz (Baumgart et al. , 2016) and served as a testbed for advanced sensing protocols such as dynamical decoupling (Biercuk et al. , 2009; Kotler et al. , 2011) and entanglement-enhanced sensing (Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baumgart et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 6
Spin squeezing has increased the bandwidth of magnetometry devices.
“It has improved the sensitivity of magnetometry devices beyond the shot noise limit (Ockeloen et al. , 2013; Sewell et al. , 2012) and has increased their bandwidth (Shah et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shah et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 6
Entanglement in the form of spin squeezing has been produced by optical non-destructive measurements of atomic population and atomic interactions.
“Entanglement - in the form of spin squeezing (Wineland et al. , 1992) -has been produced by optical non-destructive measurements of atomic population (Appel et al. , 2009; Bohnet et al. , 2014; Cox et al. , 2016; Hosten et al. , 2016a; Leroux et al. , 2010a; LouchetChauvet et al. , 2010; Schleier-Smith et al. , 2010b) and atomic interactions (Esteve et al. , 2008; Riedel et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wineland et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Appel et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Esteve et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Trapped ions have served as a testbed for advanced sensing protocols such as dynamical decoupling and entanglement-enhanced sensing.
“Being an extremely clean system, trapped ions have demonstrated sensitivities down to 4 . 6 pT / √ Hz (Baumgart et al. , 2016) and served as a testbed for advanced sensing protocols such as dynamical decoupling (Biercuk et al. , 2009; Kotler et al. , 2011) and entanglement-enhanced sensing (Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Biercuk et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kotler et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leibfried et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Trapped ions have been extensively used to study electric field noise above surfaces.
“Trapped ions have been extensively used to study electric field noise above surfaces (Brownnutt et al. , 2015), which could arise from charge fluctuations induced by adsorbents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brownnutt et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6
Rydberg atom single-photon detector sensitivity has been improved by employing Schrödinger cat states to reach 300 nV/m/√Hz.
“Their sensitivity has recently been improved by employing Schr¨ odinger cat states to reach a level of 300nV/m/ √ Hz (Facon et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Facon et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6
Rydberg states in vapour cells have been applied to sense weak electric fields, mostly in the GHz frequency range.
“They have been applied to sense weak electric fields, mostly in the GHz frequency range (Fan et al. , 2015; Sedlacek et al. , 2012), and have been suggested as a candidate for a primary traceable standard of microwave power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fan et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sedlacek et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 4
In atomic gravimeters and gyrometers, an atomic cloud measures acceleration by sensing the spatial phase shift of a laser beam along its freely falling trajectory.
“In these devices an atomic cloud measures acceleration by sensing the spatial phase shift of a laser beam along its freely falling trajectory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4
Vapor cells have been used to demonstrate entanglement-enhanced sensing.
“Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm 3 small volumes (Shah et al. , 2007) and have been used to demonstrate entanglement-enhanced sensing (Fernholz et al. , 2008; Wasilewski et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fernholz et al. , 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wasilewski et al. , 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Trapped ions' small size could compensate for their lower absolute sensitivity in applications like microscopy where high spatial resolution is required.
“Their small size could compensate for this downside in applications like microscopy, where high spatial resolution is required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4
A high atomic density suppresses decoherence from atomic interactions because frequent collisions average out their effect, similar to motional narrowing.
“Somewhat counterintuitively, a high density suppresses decoherence from atomic interactions, since collisions occur so frequently that their effect averages out, similar to motional narrowing of dipolar interactions in nuclear magnetic resonance (Happer and Tang, 1973).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Happer and Tang, 1973
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4
Vapor cells have found use in magnetoencephalography.
“The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity (Jensen et al. , 2016; Livanov et al. , 1978), which has found use in magnetoencephalography (Xia et al. , 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xia et al. , 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6
Ground state spin sublevels of ions are magnetic-field-sensitive qubits analogous to neutral atoms.
“Independently, the ground state spin sublevels of ions are magnetic-field-sensitive qubits analogous to neutral atoms discussed above (Baumgart et al. , 2016; Kotler et al. , 2011; Maiwald et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Baumgart et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kotler et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maiwald et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6
Rydberg atoms in vacuum have been employed as single-photon detectors for microwave photons in a cryogenic cavity.
“As their most spectacular sensing application, Rydberg atoms in vacuum have been employed as single-photon detectors for microwave photons in a cryogenic cavity in a series of experiments that has been highlighted by the Nobel prize in Physics in 2012 (Gleyzes et al. , 2007; Haroche, 2013; Nogues et al. , 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gleyzes et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Haroche, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nogues et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 2. Variance detection (quadratic detection) · p. 14
The quadratic relation for variance detection holds for small γV_rms t ≪ 1.
“This relation holds for small γV rms t ≪ 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Variance detection (quadratic detection) · p. 14
If the magnitude of δV fluctuates between measurements so that 〈δV〉=0, readout at p0=0.5 will yield no information about δV, since 〈p〉≈p0=0.5.
“If the magnitude of δV fluctuates between measurements so that 〈 δV 〉 = 0, readout at p 0 = 0 . 5 will yield no information about δV , since 〈 p 〉 ≈ p 0 = 0 . 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Second example: Rabi measurement · p. 13
Only time-dependent signals with frequency ω ≈ ω0 affect the transition probability p in a Rabi measurement, a condition known as resonance.
“Hence, only time-dependent signals with frequency ω ≈ ω 0 affect the transition probability p , a condition known as resonance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7
Spin ensembles have served as gyroscopes exploiting Larmor precession frequency shift in a rotating laboratory frame.
“Spin ensembles have equally served as gyroscopes (Fang and Qin, 2012; Woodman et al. , 1987), exploiting the fact that Larmor precession occurs in an independent frame of reference and therefore appears frequencyshifted in a rotating laboratory frame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fang and Qin, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Woodman et al., 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ D. Atomic clocks · p. 7
Today's most advanced atomic clocks employ optical transitions in single ions or atomic clouds trapped in an optical lattice.
“Today's most advanced atomic clocks employ optical transitions in single ions (Huntemann et al. , 2016) or atomic clouds trapped in an optical lattice (Bloom et al. , 2014; Hinkley et al. , 2013; Takamoto et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Huntemann et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bloom et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Takamoto et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7
NV ensemble advantages are partially offset by a reduced coherence time (T2 < 1 ms at room temperature, compared to T2 > 1 s for vapor cells).
“Although these advantages are partially offset by a reduced coherence time ( T 2 < 1 ms at room temperature, as compared to T 2 > 1 s for vapor cells), the predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT / √ Hz / cm -3 / 2 ) (Taylor et al. , 2008) or gyroscopes (10 -5 rad / s / √ Hz / mm 3 / 2 ) (Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012; Ledbetter et al. , 2012) would be competitive with their”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Atomic clocks · p. 7
Some advanced clocks employ multi-qubit quantum logic gates for readout of highly stable but optically inactive clock ions.
“Interestingly, even entanglement-enhanced sensing has found use in actual devices, since some advanced clocks employ multi-qubit quantum logic gates for readout of highly stable but optically inactive clock ions (Rosenband et al. , 2008; Schmidt et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rosenband et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schmidt et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ D. Atomic clocks · p. 6
Quantum sensors can be regarded as clocks operating on a bad, environment-sensitive clock transition to measure external fields.
“Vice versa, quantum sensors discussed above can be regarded as clocks that operate on purpose on a bad, environment-sensitive clock transition in order to measure external fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7
Translation of NV ensemble potential into actual devices remains challenging.
“Translation of this potential into actual devices remains challenging, with two technical hurdles standing out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. First example: Ramsey measurement · p. 13
By recording the transition probability p as a function of time t in a Ramsey measurement, an oscillatory output ('Ramsey fringes') is observed with a frequency given by ω0.
“By recording p as a function of time t , an oscillatory output ('Ramsey fringes') is observed with a frequency given by ω 0 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7
Readout of single spins in the solid state has been achieved both by electrical and optical schemes.
“Readout of single spins in the solid state -a major milestone on the road towards quantum computers -has been achieved both by electrical and optical schemes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 1. Slope detection (linear detection) · p. 14
The Ramsey interferometer is most sensitive to small perturbations δV around V0=ω0/γ when operated at the point of maximum slope where p0=0.5.
“The Ramsey interferometer is most sensitive to small perturbations δV around V 0 = ω 0 /γ when operated at the point of maximum slope where p 0 = 0 . 5, indicated by the filled red dot in Fig. 3(a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 1. Quantum projection noise · p. 15
Quantum projection noise is the most fundamental source of uncertainty in quantum sensing.
“Quantum projection noise is the most fundamental source of uncertainty in quantum sensing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ D. Atomic clocks · p. 6
Atomic clock operation employs identical protocols as quantum sensors to compare the qubit's transition to an unstable local oscillator and lock the latter to the former.
“Their operation as clocks, however, employs identical protocols as the operation of quantum sensors, in order to repeatedly compare the qubit's transition to the frequency of an unstable local oscillator and subsequently lock the latter to the former.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Slope detection (linear detection) · p. 14
Slope detection has a limited linear range because phase wrapping occurs for |γδV t| > π/2.
“Note that slope detection has a limited linear range because phase wrapping occurs for | γδV t | > π/ 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Second example: Rabi measurement · p. 13
A Rabi measurement can provide information not only on the magnitude V⊥, but also on the frequency ω of a signal.
“From this condition it is clear that a Rabi measurement can provide information not only on the magnitude V ⊥ , but also on the frequency ω of a signal (Aiello et al. , 2013; Fedder et al. , 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Aiello et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fedder et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. First example: Ramsey measurement · p. 13
The Ramsey measurement can directly provide a measurement of the energy splitting ω0.
“Thus, the Ramsey measurement can directly provide a measurement of the energy splitting ω 0 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2. Variance detection (quadratic detection) · p. 14
If the fluctuation is Gaussian, the variance detection result can be extended to any large value of γV_rms t.
“If the fluctuation is Gaussian, the result can be extended to any large value of γV rms t ,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7
Densely-doped diamond crystals promise to deliver 'frozen vapor cells' of spin ensembles that combine strong electronic magnetic moment and efficient optical readout of atomic vapor cells with high spin densities achievable in solid state.
“Densely-doped diamond crystals promise to deliver 'frozen vapor cells' of spin ensembles that combine the strong (electronic) magnetic moment and efficient optical readout of atomic vapor cells with the high spin densities achievable in the solid state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7
Spin coherence times are reduced 100-1000 times in high-density NV ensembles owing to interaction of NV spins with parasitic substitutional nitrogen spins incorporated during high-density doping.
“Second, spin coherence times are reduced 100 -1000 times in highdensity ensembles owing to interaction of NV spins with parasitic substitutional nitrogen spins incorporated during high-density doping (Acosta et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Acosta et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7
Magnetic field sensors have been built that infer field strength from Larmor precession of nuclear spins.
“Magnetic field sensors have been built that infer field strength from their Larmor precession, analogous to neutral atom magnetometers described above (Kitching et al. , 2011; Packard and Varian, 1954; Waters and Francis, 1958).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kitching et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Packard and Varian, 1954
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Waters and Francis, 1958
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Variance detection (quadratic detection) · p. 14
If the interferometer is tuned to p0=0, a signal with variance 〈δV^2〉=V_rms^2 gives rise to a mean transition probability that is quadratic in V_rms and t.
“If the interferometer is tuned to p 0 = 0, a signal with variance 〈 δV 2 〉 = V 2 rms gives rise to a mean transition probability that is quadratic in V rms and t (Meriles et al. , 2010),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meriles et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7
NMR ensemble magnetometers have found broad use in geology, archaeology and space missions thanks to their simplicity and robustness.
“Although the sensitivity of these devices (10 pT / √ Hz) (Lenz, 1990) is inferior to their atomic counterparts, they have found broad use in geology, archaeology and space missions thanks to their simplicity and robustness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Slope detection (linear detection) · p. 14
Phase wrapping restricts the dynamic range of the quantum sensor.
“The phase wrapping restricts the dynamic range of the quantum sensor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Atomic clocks · p. 6
An atomic clock can be regarded as a quantum sensor measuring and stabilizing the phase drift of a local oscillator.
“Therefore, an atomic clock can be equally regarded as a quantum sensor measuring and stabilizing the phase drift of a local oscillator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 22
The detection of AC fields can be extended to the more general task of sensing and reconstructing arbitrary time dependent fields.
“The detection of AC fields can be extended to the more general task of sensing and reconstructing arbitrary time dependent fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Signal integration · p. 18
For weak signals with long averaging times T ≫ Tχ, variance detection is typically much less sensitive than slope detection.
“Hence, for weak signals with long averaging times T ≫ T χ , variance detection is typically much less sensitive than slope detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21
The weighting functions of CP and PDD sequences resemble narrow-band filters around center frequencies f_ac = f_k = k/(2τ), where k = 1,3,5,... is the harmonic order.
“Because of the first (sinc) term, these weighting functions resemble narrow-band filters around the center frequencies f ac = f k = k/ (2 τ ), where k = 1 , 3 , 5 , ... is the harmonic order.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Quantum projection noise · p. 15
For slope detection, where p0=0.5, the projective readout adds noise of order 1/(2√N) to the probability value p.
“Thus, the projective readout adds noise of order 1 / (2 √ N ) to the probability value p .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The readout is projective.
- Premisecitation§ D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 23
These basis-function methods can be combined with compressive sensing techniques to reduce the number of acquisitions needed to reconstruct the time-dependent signal.
“In addition, they can be combined with compressive sensing techniques (Cand´ es et al. , 2006; Magesan et al. , 2013a; Puentes et al. , 2014) to reduce the number of acquisition needed to reconstruct the time-dependent signal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cand´ es et al. , 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Magesan et al. , 2013a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Puentes et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 17
If C(t_m) improves as C ∝ √t_m, the optimum choice is t_m ≈ t.
“In particular, if C ( t m ) does improve as C ∝ √ t m - which is a typical situation when operating in the averaged readout regime - the optimum choice is t m ≈ t .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Correlation sequences · p. 24
Since the qubit is parked in |0> and |1> during the free evolution period, relaxation is no longer governed by T2, but by the typically much longer T1 relaxation time.
“Since the qubit is parked in | 0 〉 and | 1 〉 during the free evolution period, relaxation is no longer governed by T 2 , but by the typically much longer T 1 relaxation time (Laraoui and Meriles, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laraoui and Meriles, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 3. Continuous sampling · p. 24
In continuous sampling, the output signal can be Fourier transformed to extract the undersampled frequency of the original signal.
“The output signal can then be Fourier transformed to extract the undersampled frequency of the original signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ C. Multipulse sensing sequences · p. 20
Multipulse sensing sequences allow detailed shaping of the frequency response of the quantum sensor.
“These sequences are commonly referred to as multipulse sensing sequences or multipulse control sequences, and allow for a detailed shaping of the frequency response of the quantum sensor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 17
For a Ramsey measurement with an exponential dephasing e^-χ(t)=e^-t/T2*, the optimum evolution time is t=T2*/2.
“Specifically, for a Ramsey measurement with an exponential dephasing e -χ ( t ) = e -t/T ∗ 2 , the optimum evolution time is t = T ∗ 2 / 2 and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: t_m ≪ t for the exact optimum solution in slope detection.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Correlation sequences · p. 24
In this way, a Fourier-limited spectral resolution of Δf ∼ 1/T1 is possible.
“In this way, a Fourierlimited spectral resolution of ∆ f ∼ 1 /T 1 is possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Ramsey and Echo sequences · p. 20
Sensitivity to alternating signals can be restored by using time-reversal ('spin echo') techniques.
“Sensitivity to alternating signals can be restored by using time-reversal ('spin echo') techniques (Hahn, 1950).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn, 1950
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Decoherence · p. 15
Decoherence and relaxation cause random transitions between states or random phase pick-up during coherent evolution of the qubit, leading to a reduction of the observed probability δp with increasing sensing time t.
“Decoherence and relaxation cause random transitions between states or random phase pick-up during coherent evolution of the qubit (for more detail, see Section VII). The two processes lead to a reduction of the observed probability δp with increasing sensing time t ,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Allan variance · p. 18
The Allan variance can also be used to reveal the performance of a sensor beyond the standard quantum limit.
“The Allan variance can also be used to reveal the performance of a sensor beyond the standard quantum limit (Leroux et al. , 2010b), and its extension to and limits in quantum metrology have been recently explored (Chabuda et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Leroux et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chabuda et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Ramsey and Echo sequences · p. 20
The Ramsey sequence will only be sensitive to slowly varying signals up to some cut-off frequency ≈ t^-1.
“To answer our question, the Ramsey sequence will only be sensitive to slowly varying signals up to some cut-off frequency ≈ t -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Correlation sequences · p. 23
Since the multipulse sequence is phase sensitive, constructive or destructive phase build-up occurs between the two sequences depending on whether the free evolution period t1 is a half multiple or full multiple of the AC signal period T_ac = 1/f_ac.
“Since the multipulse sequence is phase sensitive, constructive or destructive phase build-up occurs between the two sequences depending on whether the free evolution period t 1 is a half multiple or full multiple of the AC signal period T ac = 1 /f ac .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Continuous sampling · p. 24
Continuous sampling has recently led to the demonstration of μHz spectral resolution.
“Continuous sampling has recently led to the demonstration of µ Hz spectral resolution (Boss et al. , 2017; Jelezko et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Boss et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jelezko et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22
The time response of the transition probability for a signal with fixed amplitude and random phase is given by Eq. (75), where J0 is the Bessel function of the first kind.
“The time response of the transition probability is (Kotler et al. , 2013)”
- Also stated in: § 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22 · plain
“where J 0 is the Bessel function of the first kind and where the second equation reflects the resonant case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kotler et al. , 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Multipulse sensing sequences · p. 20
For composite signals consisting of several harmonics with different frequencies and amplitudes, the accumulated phase is the sum of individual tone amplitudes multiplied by the respective weighting functions.
“For composite signals consisting of several harmonics with different frequencies and amplitudes, Eq. (61), the accumulated phase simply represents the sum of individual tone amplitudes multiplied by the respective weighting functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 22
This simple waveform reconstruction approach is limited to the bandwidth of the sequence and by readout deadtimes.
“This approach is, however, limited to the bandwidth of the sequence and by readout deadtimes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 23
By measuring N Walsh coefficients (by applying N different sequences), one can reconstruct an N-point functional approximation to the field V(t') from the N-th partial sum of the Walsh-Fourier series.
“By measuring N Walsh coefficients (by applying N different sequences) one can reconstruct an N -point functional approximation to the field V ( t ′ ) from the N -th partial sum of the Walsh-Fourier series (Cooper et al. , 2014; Magesan et al. , 2013b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cooper et al. , 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Magesan et al. , 2013b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 2. Lock-in detection · p. 21
It is possible to correlate the phase acquired during two subsequent multipulse sequences to perform high-resolution spectroscopy of AC signals.
“Furthermore, it is possible to correlate the phase acquired during two subsequent multipulse sequences to perform high-resolution spectroscopy of AC signals (see Section VI.E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 22
A simple approach to waveform reconstruction is to record the time response p(t) under a specific sensing sequence, such as a Ramsey sequence, and to reconstruct the phase φ(t) and signal V(t) from the time trace.
“A simple approach is to record the time response p ( t ) under a specific sensing sequence, such as a Ramsey sequence, and to reconstruct the phase φ ( t ) and signal V ( t ) from the time trace (Balasubramanian et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balasubramanian et al. , 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ D. Quantum Cram´ er Rao Bound for parameter estimation · p. 19
The Fisher information for the Ramsey protocol oscillates between its minimum, where γV t = (k+1/2)π and F=0, and its optimum, where γV t = kπ and F=t^2 e^-2χ.
“The Fisher information thus oscillates between its minimum, where γV t = ( k + 1 / 2) π and F = 0, and its optimum, where γV t = kπ and F = t 2 e -2 χ .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A projective measurement in the σ_x basis is performed for the Fisher information.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Dynamical decoupling spectroscopy · p. 23
The spectral resolution of dynamical decoupling spectroscopy is determined by the bandwidth of the weighting function W(f_ac, τ), which is given by Δf ≈ 1/t.
“The spectral resolution of dynamical decoupling spectroscopy is determined by the bandwidth of the weighting function W ( f ac , τ ), which is given by ∆ f ≈ 1 /t (see Eq. (69)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ D. Quantum Cram´ er Rao Bound for parameter estimation · p. 19
To reach the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, local measurements and at most adaptive estimators are sufficient, without the need for entanglement.
“Thus, to reach the QCRB, local measurements and at most adaptive estimators are sufficient, without the need for entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum projection noise · p. 15
The uncertainty in p is given by the variance of the binomial distribution.
“The uncertainty in p is given by the variance of the binomial distribution (Itano et al. , 1993),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Itano et al., 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The readout is projective.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Dynamical decoupling spectroscopy · p. 23
Because t can only be made as long as the decoherence time T2, the spectral resolution is limited to Δf ≈ 1/T2.
“Because t can only be made as long as the decoherence time T 2 , the spectral resolution is limited to ∆ f ≈ 1 /T 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 1. Dynamical decoupling spectroscopy · p. 23
The precision of frequency estimation, which also depends on the signal-to-noise ratio, is directly proportional to Δf.
“The precision of the frequency estimation, which also depends on the signal-to-noise ratio, is directly proportional to ∆ f .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 17
Because the decay function χ(t) exponentially penalizes the sensitivity for t > Tχ, the optimum sensing time is reached when t ≈ Tχ.
“However, because the decay function χ ( t ) exponentially penalizes the sensitivity for t > T χ , the optimum sensing time is reached when t ≈ T χ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
The phase φ can be recovered by Bayesian estimation.
“The phase φ can be recovered by Bayesian estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
The Heisenberg limit can only be reached if the number of resources (qubits or repetitions) spent on each bit are carefully optimized.
“The Heisenberg limit can only be reached if the number of resources (qubits or repetitions) spent on each bit are carefully optimized (Berry et al. , 2009; Cappellaro, 2012; Said et al. , 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Berry et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cappellaro, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Said et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 1. Basic theory of relaxometry · p. 26
The transition rate equals the spectral density of the noise evaluated at the transition frequency, multiplied by a matrix element of order unity.
“The last equation (97) is an extremely simple, yet powerful and quantitative relationship: the transition rate equals the spectral density of the noise evaluated at the transition frequency, multiplied by a matrix element of order unity (Abragam, 1961; Schoelkopf et al. , 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Abragam, 1961
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schoelkopf et al. , 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30
To provide an estimate of φ with 2^{-M} accuracy, 2^M applications of the phase shift U are required.
“To provide an estimate of φ with 2 -M accuracy, 2 M applications of the phase shift ˆ U are required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
Given a redundant set of phases, a post-processing algorithm can mimic the adaptive algorithm by postselecting those results that have been measured using the phase most closely resembling the correct adaptive choice.
“given a redundant set of phases, a post-processing algorithm can mimic the adaptive algorithm by postselecting those results that have been measured using the phase most closely resembling the correct adaptive choice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. T 1 relaxometry · p. 27
T1 relaxometry is only sensitive to the transverse component of V.
“Thus, T 1 relaxometry is only sensitive to the transverse component of ⃗ V .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28
The smallest detectable signal is approximately V_min ≈ 2/(γC√(T2* T)), where T is total measurement time and C is readout efficiency.
“The smallest detectable signal is approximately V min ≈ 2 / ( γC √ T ∗ 2 T ), where T is the total measurement time and C the readout efficiency parameter (see Eqs. 43 and 47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eqs. 43 and 47
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28
A detuning increases the accessible spectral range towards higher frequencies.
“A detuning therefore increases the accessible spectral range towards higher frequencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30
The limitation of QFT-based phase estimation can be circumvented by an adaptive measurement scheme that reads the qubits sequentially, feeding back the classical measurement result into the quantum circuit.
“This limitation can be circumvented by an adaptive measurement scheme that reads the qubits sequentially, feeding back the classical measurement result into the quantum circuit (Griffiths and Niu, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Griffiths and Niu, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25
The Ramsey sequence acts as a simple sinc filter for the noise spectrum S_V(ω), centered at zero frequency and with a lowpass cut-off frequency of approximately π/t.
“The Ramsey sequence hence acts as a simple sinc filter for the noise spectrum S V ( ω ), centered at zero frequency and with a lowpass cut-off frequency of approximately π/t .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
This set of measurements contains all the information required to extract φ.
“This set of measurements still contains all the information required to extract φ , which can be motivated by the following arguments:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28
Given a measured transition probability p, there is an infinite number of possible signal amplitudes V that can correspond to this value of p.
“Given a measured transition probability p , there is an infinite number of possible signal amplitudes V that can correspond to this value of p”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 29
The basic measurement protocol can be applied only to small changes of a quantity around a fixed known value, frequently zero.
“Hence, the basic measurement protocol can be applied only to small changes of a quantity around a fixed known value, frequently zero.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28
The basic quantum sensing protocol cannot simultaneously achieve high sensitivity and measure signals over a large amplitude range.
“The basic quantum sensing protocol cannot simultaneously achieve high sensitivity and measure signals over a large amplitude range .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28
Because ω1 ≪ ω0, dressed states provide useful means for covering the medium frequency range of the spectrum.
“Because ω 1 ≪ ω 0 , dressed states provide useful means for covering the medium frequency range of the spectrum (see Fig. 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 29
The dynamic range of the basic protocol only improves with the square root of the total measurement time T.
“Moreover, the dynamic range only improves with the square root of the total measurement time T .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28
In a Ramsey measurement, phase wrapping occurs once γVt exceeds ±π/2, where t is the sensing time.
“For the example of a Ramsey measurement, p oscillates with the signal amplitude V and phase wrapping occurs once γV t exceeds ± π/ 2, where t is the sensing time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29
A family of advanced sensing techniques can achieve a dynamic range that scales close to DR ∝ T.
“Interestingly, a family of advanced sensing techniques can efficiently address this problem and achieve a dynamic range that scales close to DR ∝ T .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Relaxometry · p. 26
Relaxometry is based on first-order perturbation theory and Fermi's golden rule.
“Relaxometry is based on first-order perturbation theory and Fermi's golden rule.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abragam, 1961
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Dynamical decoupling · p. 26
This result provides a simple strategy for reconstructing the noise spectrum: by sweeping the time τ between pulses, the spectrum can be probed at various frequencies.
“This result provides a simple strategy for reconstructing the noise spectrum. By sweeping the time τ between pulses the spectrum can be probed at various frequencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28
A unique assignment of V from p requires a priori knowledge that V lies within ±π/(2γt) of an expected signal amplitude.
“A unique assignment hence requires a priori knowledge - that V lies within ± π/ (2 γt ), or within half a Ramsey fringe, of an expected signal amplitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
At least one qubit of every digit will perform its measurement on the slope of a Ramsey fringe, allowing for a precise measurement of 2^m φ regardless of its value.
“Hence, at least one qubit of every digit will perform its measurement on the slope of a Ramsey fringe, allowing for a precise measurement of 2 m φ regardless of its value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28
The origin of the limited dynamic range problem lies in the limited range of values for the probability p, which must fall between 0 and 1.
“The origin of this problem lies in the limited range of values for the probability p , which must fall between 0 and 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
Most resources should be allocated to the most significant bit, because errors at this stage are most detrimental to sensitivity.
“Clearly, most resources should be allocated to the most significant bit, because errors at this stage are most detrimental to sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28
Detuned drive fields have been used to map the 1/f noise spectrum of transmon qubits up to the GHz range.
“Detuned drive fields have been used to map the 1 /f noise spectrum of transmon qubits up to the GHz range (Slichter et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Slichter et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
Every measurement x_j = ±1 provides information about φ, described by the a posteriori probability.
“Every measurement x j = ± 1 provides information about φ , which is described by the a posteriori probability”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29
The central idea of advanced sensing is to combine measurements with different sensing times such that the least sensitive measurement with the highest V_max yields a coarse estimate, subsequently refined by more sensitive measurements.
“The central idea is to combine measurements with different sensing times t such that the least sensitive measurement with the highest V max yields a coarse estimate of the quantity of interest, which is subsequently refined by more sensitive measurements (Fig. 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30
The inverse quantum Fourier transform (QFT) can be implemented with polynomial effort, using O(M^2) control gates.
“This algorithm can be implemented with polynomial effort ( i.e. , using O ( M 2 ) control gates).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nielsen and Chuang, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
From a spectroscopic point of view, measurements with different phases correspond to Ramsey fringes with different quadratures.
“From a spectroscopic point of view, measurements with different phases correspond to Ramsey fringes with different quadratures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31
Efficient quantum phase estimation can also be implemented without adaptive feedback, with the advantage of technical simplicity.
“Efficient quantum phase estimation can also be implemented without adaptive feedback, with the advantage of technical simplicity (Higgins et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 29
The basic protocol does not apply to determining the value of a large and a priori unknown quantity.
“The protocol does not apply to the problem of determining the value of a large and a priori unknown quantity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
In practice, it is sometimes difficult to achieve a √M scaling because instrumental stability is more critical for ensemble sensors.
“In practice, it is sometimes difficult to achieve a √ M scaling because instrumental stability is more critical for ensemble sensors (Wolf et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wolf et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33
Already for small M, it is possible to show sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.
“Already for small M , it is possible to show sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit (Kuzmich and Mandel, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kuzmich and Mandel, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31
Heisenberg scaling in the temporal dimension shifted into focus with an experiment published in 2007, where adaptive phase estimation was employed in a single-photon interferometer.
“Heisenberg scaling in the temporal dimension has shifted into focus with an experiment published in 2007, where adaptive phase estimation was employed in a single-photon interferometer (Higgins et al. , 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
For ensemble sensors such as atomic vapor magnetometers or spin arrays, the quantity of interest is more likely the number density of qubits, rather than the absolute number of qubits M.
“For ensemble sensors such as atomic vapor magnetometers or spin arrays, the quantity of interest is more likely the number density of qubits, rather than the absolute number of qubits M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31
High-dynamic-range protocols have been demonstrated on NV centers in diamond using both nonadaptive and adaptive implementations.
“Meanwhile, high-dynamic-range protocols have been demonstrated on NV centers in diamond using both nonadaptive implementations (Nusran et al. , 2012; Waldherr et al. , 2012) and an adaptive protocol based on quantum feedback (Bonato, C. et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nusran et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Waldherr et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bonato, C. et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
The use of M qubits accelerates the measurement by a factor of M, because the basic quantum sensing cycle can now be operated in parallel rather than sequentially.
“The use of M qubits accelerates the measurement by a factor of M , because the basic quantum sensing cycle (Steps 1-5 of the protocol, Fig. 2) can now be operated in parallel rather than sequentially.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
The maximum density of qubits is limited by internal interactions between the qubits.
“The maximum density of qubits is limited by internal interactions between the qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31
Bayesian estimation is slower than adaptive estimation due to additional redundant measurements.
“Bayesian estimation in turn is slower than adaptive estimation due to additional redundant measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
The scaling can be seen as arising from the projection noise associated with measuring the quantum system, where it is often called the Standard Quantum Limit (SQL) or shot noise limit.
“The scaling can be seen as arising from the projection noise associated with measuring the quantum system, where it is often called the Standard Quantum Limit (SQL) (Braginskii and Vorontsov, 1975; Giovannetti et al. , 2004) or shot noise limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Braginskii and Vorontsov, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Giovannetti et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31
Adaptive estimation is slower than quantum phase estimation by the QFT since it trades spatial resources (entanglement) into temporal resources (measurement time).
“Adaptive estimation is slower than quantum phase estimation by the QFT since it trades spatial resources (entanglement) into temporal resources (measurement time).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31
These entangled states promise Heisenberg scaling in the spatial dimension (number of qubits) rather than time.
“These states promise Heisenberg scaling in the spatial dimension (number of qubits) rather than time (Giovannetti et al. , 2004, 2006; Lee et al. , 2002)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Giovannetti et al., 2004, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lee et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
This scaling is equivalent to the situation where M classical sensors are operated in parallel.
“This scaling is equivalent to the situation where M classical sensors are operated in parallel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32
The use of multiple qubits opens up many additional possibilities that cannot be implemented on a single qubit sensor.
“The use of multiple qubits opens up many additional possibilities that cannot be implemented on a single qubit sensor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32
This in turn requires preparing the quantum sensors in an entangled state.
“This in turn requires preparing the quantum sensors in an entangled state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32
Equivalently, M parallel qubits can improve the sensitivity by √M per unit time.
“Equivalently, M parallel qubits can improve the sensitivity by √ M per unit time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33
Heisenberg-limited sensitivity with a GHZ state was demonstrated using three entangled Be ions.
“Heisenberg-limited sensitivity with a GHZ state was demonstrated using three entangled Be ions (Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leibfried et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33
Assuming each probe is subjected to uncorrelated dephasing noise, the rate of decoherence of the GHZ state is M times faster than for a product state.
“Assuming, for example, that each probe is subjected to uncorrelated dephasing noise, the rate of decoherence of the GHZ state is M time faster than for a product state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33
If the phase is applied only to mode a of the interferometer, the phase accumulated is M times larger than for a one-photon state.
“If the phase is applied only to mode a of the interferometer, the phase accumulated is then”
- Also stated in: § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33 · plain
“that is, M times larger than for a one-photon state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33 · plain
- Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34
More recently, atom-light interactions in high-quality cavities have enabled squeezing of large ensembles atoms that can perform as atomic clocks beyond the standard quantum limit.
“More recently, atom-light interactions in high-quality cavities have enabled squeezing of large ensembles atoms (Bohnet et al. , 2014; Cox et al. , 2016; Gross et al. , 2010; Hosten et al. , 2016a; Leroux et al. , 2010a; LouchetChauvet et al. , 2010; Schleier-Smith et al. , 2010a) that can perform as atomic clocks beyond the standard quantum limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bohnet et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cox et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gross et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35
The quantum state |ψ〉 can be stored and retrieved in an auxiliary qubit.
“The quantum state | ψ 〉 can be stored and retrieved in the auxiliary qubit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
More generally, one can measure a many-body Hamiltonian term with a strength proportional to the signal to be estimated.
“More generally, one can measure a many-body Hamiltonian term with a strength proportional to the signal to be estimated (Herrera-Mart´ ı et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herrera-Mart´ ı et al. , 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
In dynamical decoupling schemes, a separation in the frequency of noise and signal is required.
“For example, in dynamical decoupling schemes, a separation in the frequency of noise and signal is required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
This imposes an additional condition on a QEC code: the quantum Fisher information in the code subspace must be non-zero.
“This imposes an additional condition on a QEC code: the quantum Fisher information (Giovannetti et al. , 2011; Lu et al. , 2015) in the code subspace must be non-zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Giovannetti et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lu et al. , 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33
Similar to GHZ and N00N states, a key ingredient to this sensitivity enhancement is entanglement.
“Similar to GHZ and N00N states, a key ingredient to this sensitivity enhancement is entanglement (Sørensen and Mølmer, 2001; Wang and Sanders, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sørensen and Mølmer, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang and Sanders, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Parity measurements · p. 34
A challenge in achieving the full potential of multiqubit enhanced metrology is the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout.
“A challenge in achieving the full potential of multiqubit enhanced metrology is the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35
Repetitive (quantum non-demolition) readout of the final qubit state can be used to reduce classical readout noise.
“A second example includes a repetitive (quantum non-demolition) readout of the final qubit state, which can be used to reduce the classical readout noise (Jiang et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al. , 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33
These states can help improving the sensitivity of quantum interferometry, as demonstrated by Wineland et al. (1992, 1994).
“Thus, these states can help improving the sensitivity of quantum interferometry, as demonstrated by Wineland et al. , 1992,Wineland et al. , 1994.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wineland et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wineland et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35
Storage can be achieved by a SWAP gate (or more simply two consecutive c-NOT gates) on the sensing and auxiliary qubits.
“Storage can be achieved by a SWAP gate (or more simply two consecutive c-NOT gates) on the sensing and auxiliary qubits, respectively (Rosskopf et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
The simplest scheme for QEC is to use a single good qubit (unaffected by noise) to protect the sensor qubit.
“The simplest scheme for QEC is to use a single good qubit (unaffected by noise) to protect the sensor qubit (Arrad et al. , 2014; Hirose and Cappellaro, 2016; Kessler et al. , 2014; Ticozzi and Viola, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Arrad et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hirose and Cappellaro, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kessler et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
If the signal to be detected couples to the sensor in a similar way as the noise, the QEC code also eliminates the effect of the signal.
“In particular, if the signal to be detected couples to the sensor in a similar way as the noise, the QEC code also eliminates the effect of the signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
Beyond single qubits, QEC has also been applied to N00N states.
“Beyond single qubits, QEC has also been applied to N00N states (Bergmann and van Loock, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bergmann and van Loock, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
Equal superpositions of these two logical basis states are optimal to achieve Heisenberg-limited sensitivity in estimating a global phase.
“Note that (D¨ ur et al. , 2014; Ozeri, 2013) equal superpositions of these two logical basis states are also optimal to achieve Heisenberglimited sensitivity in estimating a global phase (Bollinger et al. , 1996; Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites D¨ ur et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ozeri, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bollinger et al. , 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 35
Qubit protection can typically only be applied against errors that are orthogonal to the signal, because otherwise the signal itself would be 'corrected'.
“On the other hand, qubit protection can typically only be applied against errors that are orthogonal to the signal, because otherwise the signal itself would be 'corrected'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
Since this can typically only be achieved in a perturbative way, this scheme still leads to a compromise between noise suppression and effective signal strength.
“Since this can typically only be achieved in a perturbative way, this scheme still leads to a compromise between noise suppression and effective signal strength.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
Since the noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate, the correction steps can be performed at a much slower rate compared to dynamical decoupling.
“Since the noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate, the correction steps can be performed at a much slower rate compared to dynamical decoupling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 35
For vector fields, quantum error correction can be used to protect against noise in one spatial direction while leaving the sensor responsive to signals in the orthogonal spatial direction.
“In particular, for vector fields, quantum error correction can be used to protect against noise in one spatial direction while leaving the sensor responsive to signals in the orthogonal spatial direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
This compromise between error suppression and preservation of signal sensitivity is common to other error correction methods.
“This compromise between error suppression and preservation of signal sensitivity is common to other error correction methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
QEC often cannot discriminate between signal and noise.
“While this seems to indicate that QEC codes could be extremely useful for metrology, the method is hampered by the fact that QEC often cannot discriminate between signal and noise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33
Squeezing has also been extended to fermionic degrees of freedom (spin squeezing) to reduce the uncertainty in spectroscopy measurements of ensemble of qubit probes.
“Squeezing has also been extended to fermionic degrees of freedom (spin squeezing, Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993) to reduce the uncertainty in spectroscopy measurements of ensemble of qubit probes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36
Because the 'good' ancillary qubit can only protect against one error event (or, equivalently, suppress the error probability for continuous error), the signal acquisition must be periodically interrupted to perform a corrective step.
“Because the 'good' ancillary qubit can only protect against one error event (or, equivalently, suppress the error probability for continuous error), the signal acquisition must be periodically interrupted to perform a corrective step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 91
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 101
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 4Freely falling atoms have enabled the development of atomic gravimeters and gyrometers.
“Freely falling atoms have enabled the development of atomic gravimeters (Kasevich and Chu, 1992; Peters et al. , 1999) and gyrometers (Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kasevich and Chu, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peters et al. , 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4Long relaxation and coherence times in atomic vapors are achieved by coating cell walls to preserve the atomic spin upon collisions and by operating in the spin exchange relaxation-free (SERF) regime of high atomic density and zero magnetic field.
“These long relaxation and coherence times are achieved by coating cell walls to preserve the atomic spin upon collisions, and by operating in the spin exchange relaxation-free ('SERF') regime of high atomic density and zero magnetic field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6The trapped-ion motional-level sensor has a predicted sensitivity of 500 nV/m/√Hz or 1 yN/√Hz for the force acting on the ion.
“The sensor has a predicted sensitivity of 500 nV / m / √ Hz or 1 yN / √ Hz for the force acting on the ion (Biercuk et al. , 2010; Maiwald et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Biercuk et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maiwald et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 4The reduced velocity spread of cold atoms enabled sensing with longer interrogation times using spatially confined atoms, freely falling along specific trajectories in vacuum or trapped.
“The reduced velocity spread of cold atoms enabled sensing with longer interrogation times using spatially confined atoms, freely falling along specific trajectories in vacuum or trapped.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity.
“The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity (Jensen et al. , 2016; Livanov et al. , 1978), which has found use in magnetoencephalography (Xia et al. , 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jensen et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Livanov et al. , 1978
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm3 small volumes.
“Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm 3 small volumes (Shah et al. , 2007) and have been used to demonstrate entanglement-enhanced sensing (Fernholz et al. , 2008; Wasilewski et al. , 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shah et al. , 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 5Sensing with cold atoms has found application in solid state physics by elucidating current transport in microscopic conductors.
“Sensing with cold atoms has found application in solid state physics by elucidating current transport in microscopic conductors (Aigner et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aigner et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6Operation of ion traps in close proximity to surfaces remains a major challenge.
“However, operation of ion traps in close proximity to surfaces remains a major challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6Rydberg atoms are remarkable quantum sensors for electric fields because the loosely confined electron is easily displaced by electric fields and motional states experience strong Stark shifts.
“Rydberg atoms - atoms in highly excited electronic states - are remarkable quantum sensors for electric fields for a similar reason as trapped ions: In a classical picture, the loosely confined electron in a highly excited orbit is easily displaced by electric fields. In a quantum picture, its motional states are coupled by strong electric dipole transitions and experience strong Stark shifts (Her”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Herrmann et al., 1986
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Osterwalder and Merkt, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantum sensors · p. 4To optimize the sensitivity of a quantum sensor, the transduction parameter γ should be large and the decoherence time Tχ should be made as long as possible.
“In order to optimize the sensitivity, γ should be large (for example, by choice of an appropriate physical realization of the sensor) and the decoherence time T χ must be made as long as possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ B. Trapped ions · p. 6Practically all trapped-ion sensing demonstrations have focused on single ions, which cannot compete with ensemble sensors such as atomic vapors in terms of absolute sensitivity.
“Practically all sensing demonstrations have focused on single ions, which, in terms of absolute sensitivity, cannot compete with ensemble sensors such as atomic vapors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7Some of the earliest quantum sensors have been based on ensembles of nuclear spins.
“Some of the earliest quantum sensors have been based on ensembles of nuclear spins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7Among all solid state spins, NV centers in diamond have received by far the most attention for sensing purposes.
“Among all solid state spins, NV centers in diamond have received by far the most attention for sensing purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ B. The sensing protocol · p. 13The generic quantum sensing protocol described (steps 1-7) is sufficient to describe most sensing experiments.
“Although the above protocol is generic and simple, it is sufficient to describe most sensing experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Variance detection (quadratic detection) · p. 14Variance detection is especially important for detecting ac signals when their synchronization with the sensing protocol is not possible, or when the signal represents a noise source.
“Variance detection is especially important for detecting ac signals when their synchronization with the sensing protocol is not possible (Section VI.C.4), or when the signal represents a noise source (Section VII).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7NV centers in a magnetic field gradient have been employed as spectrum analyzer for high frequency microwave signals.
“As a technically less demanding application, NV centers in a magnetic field gradient have been employed as spectrum analyzer for high frequency microwave signals (Chipaux et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chipaux et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7In the most advanced nuclear spin gyroscope, nuclear spin precession is read out by an atomic magnetometer, which is also used for compensation of the Zeeman shift.
“In the most advanced implementation, nuclear spin precession is read out by an atomic magnetometer, which is equally used for compensation of the Zeeman shift (Kornack et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kornack et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7Mechanical detection of single paramagnetic defects in silica and real-time monitoring of few-spin fluctuations have been demonstrated.
“In addition, mechanical detection of single paramagnetic defects in silica (Rugar et al. , 2004) and real-time monitoring of few-spin fluctuations (Budakian et al. , 2005) have been demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rugar et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Budakian et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7Even the most advanced NV ensemble devices are currently limited to ~1 pT/√Hz and operate several orders of magnitude above the theory limit.
“As a consequence, even the most advanced devices are currently limited to ∼ 1 pT / √ Hz (Wolf et al. , 2015) and operate several orders of magnitude above the theory limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wolf et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7Optical readout of single spins has been shown with single organic molecules, optically active quantum dots, and defect centers in diamond and silicon carbide.
“Optical readout was shown with single organic molecules (Wrachtrup et al. , 1993a,b), optically active quantum dots (Atature et al. , 2007; Kroutvar et al. , 2004; Vamivakas et al. , 2010), and defect centers in crystalline materials including diamond (Gruber et al. , 1997) and silicon carbide (Christle et al. , 2015; Widmann et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wrachtrup et al., 1993a,b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Atature et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gruber et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7NMR sensor probes have been developed for in-situ and dynamical field mapping in clinical MRI systems.
“More recently, NMR sensor probes have been developed for in-situ and dynamical field mapping in clinical MRI systems (Zanche et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zanche et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7Electrical readout of single spins has been demonstrated with phosphorus dopants in silicon and electrostatically-defined semiconductor quantum dots.
“Electrical readout has been demonstrated with phosphorus dopants in silicon (Morello et al. , 2010) and electrostatically-defined semiconductor quantum dots (Elzerman et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Morello et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Elzerman et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7Predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT/√Hz/cm^-3/2) or gyroscopes (10^-5 rad/s/√Hz/mm^3/2) would be competitive with atomic counterparts.
“Although these advantages are partially offset by a reduced coherence time ( T 2 < 1 ms at room temperature, as compared to T 2 > 1 s for vapor cells), the predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT / √ Hz / cm -3 / 2 ) (Taylor et al. , 2008) or gyroscopes (10 -5 rad / s / √ Hz / mm 3 / 2 ) (Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012; Ledbetter et al. , 2012) would be competitive with their”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Taylor et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ledbetter et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7NV ensemble imaging has enabled imaging of magnetic organelles in magnetotactic bacteria and microscopic magnetic inclusions in meteorites, as well as contrast-agent-based magnetic resonance microscopy.
“Most prominently, this line of research has enabled imaging of magnetic organelles in magnetotactic bacteria (Le Sage et al. , 2013) and microscopic magnetic inclusions in meteorites (Fu et al. , 2014), as well as contrast-agent-based magnetic resonance microscopy (Steinert et al. , 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Le Sage et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fu et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Steinert et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ B. The sensing protocol · p. 13Classical continuous-wave absorption and transmission spectroscopy can be considered as an averaged variety of the generic quantum sensing protocol.
“For example, classical continuous-wave absorption and transmission spectroscopy can be considered as an averaged variety of this protocol.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ B. The sensing protocol · p. 13The time evolution in the generic protocol can be replaced by a spatial evolution to describe a classical interferometer.
“Also, the time evolution can be replaced by a spatial evolution to describe a classical interferometer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7Ensembles of NV centers are electronic spin defects in diamond that can be optically initialized and read out.
“Much excitement has recently been sparked by ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers (NV centers) - electronic spin defects in diamond that can be optically initialized and read out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7Nuclear spin gyroscope experiments reached a sensitivity of 5e-7 rad/s/√Hz, comparable to compact atomic interferometers and optical Sagnac interferometers.
“These experiments reached a sensitivity of 5 · 10 -7 rad / s / √ Hz, which is comparable to compact implementations of atomic interferometers and optical Sagnac interferometers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kornack et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7Efficient fluorescence detection of large NV ensembles is difficult, while absorptive and dispersive schemes are not easily implemented.
“First, efficient fluorescence detection of large NV ensembles is difficult, while absorptive and dispersive schemes are not easily implemented (Clevenson et al. , 2015; Jensen et al. , 2014; Le Sage et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Clevenson et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jensen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Le Sage et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7NMR ensemble magnetometers have sensitivity of 10 pT/√Hz, inferior to atomic counterparts.
“Although the sensitivity of these devices (10 pT / √ Hz) (Lenz, 1990) is inferior to their atomic counterparts, they have found broad use in geology, archaeology and space missions thanks to their simplicity and robustness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lenz, 1990
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ VII. NOISE SPECTROSCOPY · p. 24Noise spectroscopy relies on the systematic analysis of decoherence and relaxation under different control sequences.
“Noise spectroscopy relies on the systematic analysis of decoherence and relaxation under different control sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Signal integration · p. 18Variance detection improves only ∝ T^1/4 with the integration time, while slope detection improves ∝ T^1/2.
“We notice that variance detection improves only ∝ T 1 / 4 with the integration time, while slope detection improves ∝ T 1 / 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Decoherence · p. 15The decay time Tχ, also known as the decoherence time or relaxation time depending on the noise process, is an important figure-of-merit of the qubit, as it sets the maximum possible evolution time t available for sensing.
“The decay time T χ , also known as the decoherence time or relaxation time depending on the noise process, is an important figure-of-merit of the qubit, as it sets the maximum possible evolution time t available for sensing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22When the multipulse sequence cannot be synchronized with the signal or the phase α cannot be controlled, incoherent averaging leads to phase cancellation, <φ> = 0.
“Often, the multipulse sequence cannot be synchronized with the signal or the phase α cannot be controlled. Then, incoherent averaging leads to phase cancellation, 〈 φ 〉 = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Decoherence · p. 15Although the underlying noise processes may be very complex, the phenomenological decoherence function χ(t) can often be approximated by a simple power law.
“Although the underlying noise processes may be very complex, χ ( t ) can often be approximated by a simple power law,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Quantum projection noise · p. 15For variance detection, where ideally p0=0, the projection noise would in principle be arbitrarily low, but in any realistic experiment decoherence will shift the fringe minimum to a finite value of p.
“For variance detection, where ideally p 0 = 0, the projection noise would in principle be arbitrarily low. In any realistic experiment, however, decoherence will shift the fringe minimum to a finite value of p (see below), where Eq. (25) holds up to a constant factor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The readout is projective.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Continuous sampling · p. 24Because continuous sampling no longer relies on quantum state lifetimes, the Fourier-limited resolution can be extended to arbitrary values and is only limited by total experiment duration T, and ultimately the control hardware.
“Because continuous sampling no longer relies on quantum state lifetimes, the Fourier-limited resolution can be extended to arbitrary values and is only limited by total experiment duration T , and ultimately the control hardware.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4. Classical readout noise · p. 16Due to the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout, classical readout noise is often the dominating source of error.
“Due to the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout, classical readout noise is often the dominating source of error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 18Variance detection profits more from a long coherence time Tχ than slope detection, but is more vulnerable to decoherence.
“Thus, variance detection profits more from a long coherence time T χ than slope detection (but is, in turn, more vulnerable to decoherence).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21For large pulse numbers n, the sinc term becomes very peaked and the filter bandwidth Δf ≈ 1/(nτ) = 1/t (full width at half maximum) becomes very narrow.
“For large pulse numbers n , the sinc term becomes very peaked and the filter bandwidth ∆ f ≈ 1 / ( nτ ) = 1 /t (full width at half maximum) becomes very narrow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22If the amplitude V_pk is not fixed but slowly fluctuating between different measurements, the variance <φ^2> must be integrated over the probability distribution of V_pk.
“If the amplitude V pk is not fixed, but slowly fluctuating between different measurements, the variance 〈 φ 2 〉 must be integrated over the probability distribution of V pk .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22For a Gaussian amplitude fluctuation with an rms amplitude V_rms, the resonant time response of the transition probability is given by Eq. (76), where I0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
“A particularly important situation is a Gaussian amplitude fluctuation with an rms amplitude V rms . In this case, the resonant time response of the transition probability is”
- Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
“where I 0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Correlation sequences · p. 23In the correlation sequence method, the multipulse sequence is subdivided into two equal sensing periods of duration t_a = t/2 separated by an incremented free evolution period t1.
“The multipulse sequence is subdivided into two equal sensing periods of duration t a = t/ 2 that are separated by an incremented free evolution period t 1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ VII. NOISE SPECTROSCOPY · p. 24Good knowledge of the noise spectrum can help the adoption of suitable sensing protocols (like dynamical decoupling or quantum error correction schemes) to maximize the sensitivity of the quantum sensor.
“In particular, good knowledge of the noise spectrum can help the adoption of suitable sensing protocols (like dynamical decoupling or quantum error correction schemes) to maximize the sensitivity of the quantum sensor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21The pass-band frequency of CP and PDD sequences can be selected via the interpulse delay τ, while the filter width can be adjusted via the number of pulses n = t/τ (up to a maximum value of n ≈ T2/τ).
“In particular, the pass-band frequency can be selected via the interpulse delay τ , while the filter width can be adjusted via the number of pulses n = t/τ (up to a maximum value of n ≈ T 2 /τ ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25Depending on the type of noise present, the decoherence function shows a different dependence on t: for white noise, χ(t) = Γt; for Lorentzian noise centered at zero frequency, χ(t) = (Γt)^3; for a generic 1/f-like decay, χ(t) = (Γt)^{a+1} with a logarithmic correction.
“For white noise, the dephasing is Markovian and χ ( t ) = Γ t , where Γ is the decay rate. For Lorentzian noise centered at zero frequency the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) 3 . For a generic 1 /f -like decay, where the noise falls of ∝ ω a (with a around unity), the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) a +1 (Cywinski et al. , 2008; Medford et al. , 2012) with a logarithmic correct”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cywinski et al. , 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Medford et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dial et al. , 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15An imperfect initialization leads to a similar reduction in the observed probability δp_obs as with decoherence, but contrary to decoherence this reduction does not depend on the sensing time t.
“An imperfect initialization leads to a similar reduction in the observed probability δp obs as with decoherence,”
- Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
“Contrary to the case of decoherence, this reduction does not depend on the sensing time t .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Quantum Cram´ er Rao Bound for parameter estimation · p. 19The scaling of the quantum Cramér-Rao bound with the number of copies, N^-1/2, is a consequence of the additivity of the quantum Fisher information for tensor states ρ^⊗N, and is the well-known standard quantum limit (SQL).
“We note that the scaling of the QCRB with the number of copies, N -1 / 2 , is a consequence of the additivity of the quantum Fisher information for tensor states ρ ⊗ N . This is the well-known standard quantum limit (SQL).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Signal-to-noise ratio · p. 17The number of measurements N is equal to T/(t+t_m), where T is the total available measurement time and t_m is the extra time needed to initialize, manipulate and readout the sensor.
“In addition, the number of measurements N is equal to T/ ( t + t m ), where T is the total available measurement time and t m is the extra time needed to initialize, manipulate and readout the sensor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t, where χ(t) is the decoherence function.
“Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
“where χ ( t ) is the associated decay function or decoherence function that was already discussed in the context of sensitivity (Section V).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4. Classical readout noise · p. 17The classical readout noise σ_p,readout is often combined with the quantum projection noise σ_p,quantum to obtain a total readout uncertainty, where C = 1/√(1+R^2) ≈ 1/√(1+4κ) is an overall readout efficiency parameter.
“where C = 1 / √ 1 + R 2 ≈ 1 / √ 1 + 4 κ is an overall readout efficiency parameter (Taylor et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21Because k = 1 provides the strongest peak transmission, most reported experiments used this resonance.
“The resonance order k can also be used to select the pass-band frequency, however, because k = 1 provides the strongest peak transmission, most reported experiments used this resonance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 22Walsh dynamical decoupling sequences are a suitable basis for systematic waveform reconstruction; they apply a π pulse every time the corresponding Walsh function flips its sign.
“A suitable basis are Walsh dynamical decoupling sequences (Hayes et al. , 2011), which apply a π pulse every time the corresponding Walsh function (Walsh, 1923) flips its sign.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hayes et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Walsh, 1923
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ VII. NOISE SPECTROSCOPY · p. 24Noise spectroscopy is an important tool in quantum sensing, as it can provide much insight into both external signals and the intrinsic noise of the quantum sensor.
“Noise spectroscopy is an important tool in quantum sensing, as it can provide much insight into both external signals and the intrinsic noise of the quantum sensor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Multipulse sensing sequences · p. 20For a harmonic signal V(t') = V_pk cos(2π f_ac t' + α), the accumulated phase for any multipulse sequence defines a weighting function W(f_ac, α).
“This defines for any multipulse sequence a weighting function W ( f ac , α ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Quantum Cram´ er Rao Bound for parameter estimation · p. 19To go beyond the standard quantum limit, one needs to use entangled states; simply using correlated POVMs is not sufficient.
“To go beyond the SQL, one then needs to use entangled states (see Section IX) in particular, simply using correlated POVMs is not sufficient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Lock-in detection · p. 21Kotler et al., 2011, have shown that both quadratures of a signal can be recovered, allowing one to perform lock-in detection of the signal.
“Kotler et al. , 2011, have shown that both quadratures of a signal can be recovered, allowing one to perform lock-in detection of the signal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kotler et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ E. Frequency estimation · p. 23In quantum sensing, most frequency estimation schemes are based on dynamical decoupling sequences.
“In quantum sensing, most frequency estimation schemes are based on dynamical decoupling sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Classical readout noise · p. 17C ≤ 1 describes the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to an ideal readout (C=1).
“C ≤ 1 describes the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to an ideal readout ( C = 1), see Fig. 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Correlation sequences · p. 24The resolution can be further enhanced by long-lived auxiliary memory qubits, and resolution improvements by two-to-three orders of magnitude over dynamical decoupling spectroscopy have been demonstrated.
“The resolution can be further enhanced by long-lived auxiliary memory qubits (see Section X) and resolution improvements by two-to-three orders of magnitude over dynamical decoupling spectroscopy have been demonstrated (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pfender et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22For CP and PDD sequences, the averaged functions are given by Eq. (74) and the peak transmission at f_ac = k/2τ is W^2 = 2/(kπ)^2.
“and the peak transmission at f ac = k/ 2 τ is W 2 = 2 / ( kπ ) 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 17If C is independent of t_m, t_m should be made as short as possible.
“Conversely, if C is independent of t m - for example, because the sensor is operated in the single-shot regime or because readout resets the sensor t m should be made as short as possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25The decoherence function χ(t) can be identified with an rms phase accumulated during time t, according to the expression for variance detection, Eq. (20).
“Quite generally, χ ( t ) can be identified with an rms phase accumulated during time t ,”
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
“according to the expression for variance detection, Eq. (20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Signal-to-noise ratio · p. 17The change in probability δp can be related to the change in signal δV as δp = δV^q |∂_V p(t)| ∝ (γtδV)^q, with q=1 for slope detection and q=2 for variance detection.
“To further specify the SNR, the change in probability δp can be related to the change in signal δV as δp = δV q | ∂ q V p ( t ) | ∝ ( γtδV ) q , with q = 1 for slope detection and q = 2 for variance detection (see Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22For a signal with fixed amplitude but random phase, the variance of the phase is given by Eq. (73), where V_rms = V_pk/√2 and W^2(f_ac) is the average over α = 0...2π of the weighting functions.
“where V rms = V pk / √ 2 is the rms amplitude of the signal and W 2 ( f ac ) is the average over α = 0 . . . 2 π of the weighting functions,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28Relaxation can also be analyzed in the presence of a resonant drive field; this method is known as 'spin locking' in magnetic resonance.
“Relaxation can also be analyzed in the presence of a resonant drive field. This method is known as 'spin locking' in magnetic resonance (Slichter, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Slichter, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 29All three phase estimation protocols can be considered variations of the phase estimation scheme depicted in Fig. 12(a).
“All three protocols can be considered variations of the phase estimation scheme depicted in Fig. 12(a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y(t), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral Eq. (85), where G_V(t) is the autocorrelation function of V(t).
“Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral (Biercuk et al. , 2011; de Sousa, 2009)”
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
“where G V ( t ) is the autocorrelation function of V ( t ) (Eq. 81).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Biercuk et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites de Sousa, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28The dynamic range is given by the maximum allowed signal divided by the minimum detectable signal.
“The dynamic range is then given by the maximum allowed signal divided by the minimum detectable signal,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 29The phase estimation scheme was originally put forward by Shor (1994) and interpreted by Kitaev (1995) as a phase estimation algorithm.
“The scheme was originally put forward by Shor, 1994, in the seminal proposal of a quantum algorithm for prime factorization and has been interpreted by Kitaev, 1995, as a phase estimation algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shor, 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kitaev, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31The controlled-U gate does not change the eigenvector ψ, so that it can be re-used as often as required.
“This is possible because the controlledU gate does not change the eigenvector ψ , so that it can be re-used as often as required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25In the frequency domain, the decay function can be expressed as Eq. (86), where |Y(ω)|^2 is the filter function of y(t), defined by the finite-time Fourier transform Eq. (87).
“In the frequency domain the decay function can be expressed as”
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
“where | Y ( ω ) | 2 is the so-called fi lter function of y ( t ), defined by the finite-time Fourier transform”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. T ∗ 2 and T 2 relaxometry · p. 28Since S_V(ω) is often dominated by low-frequency noise, S_V||(0) is typically much larger than S_V⊥(ω0) and the high-frequency contribution can often be neglected.
“Since S V ( ω ) is often dominated by low-frequency noise, S V || (0) is typically much larger than S V ⊥ ( ω 0 ) and the high-frequency contribution can often be neglected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31The joint probability distribution of all measurements is obtained from the product, from which the most likely value of φ is picked as the final result.
“The joint probability distribution of all measurements is obtained from the product”
- Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
“from which the most likely value of φ is picked as the final result (Nusran et al. , 2012; Waldherr et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nusran et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Waldherr et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29The DR ∝ T scaling is sometimes referred to as another instance of the Heisenberg limit, because it can be regarded as a 1/T scaling of sensitivity at a fixed V_max.
“This scaling is sometimes referred to as another instance of the Heisenberg limit, because it can be regarded as a 1 /T scaling of sensitivity at a fixed V max .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30Quantum phase estimation based on the QFT requires two-qubit gates, which are difficult to implement experimentally, and the creation of fragile entangled states.
“While quantum phase estimation based on the QFT can be performed with polynomial time effort, the algorithm requires two-qubit gates, which are difficult to implement experimentally, and the creation of fragile entangled states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Relaxometry · p. 26Relaxometry connects the spectral density S_V(ω) of a noise signal V(t) to the relaxation rate Γ in first-order kinetics, χ(t) = Γt.
“The aim of relaxometry is to connect the spectral density S V ( ω ) of a noise signal V ( t ) to the relaxation rate Γ in first-order kinetics, χ ( t ) = Γ t .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. T ∗ 2 and T 2 relaxometry · p. 28T*2 relaxometry probes the transition rate between the superposition states |±> = (|0> ± e^{-iω0t}|1>)/√2, corresponding to the free induction decay observed in a Ramsey experiment.
“T ∗ 2 relaxometry probes the transition rate between the superposition states |±〉 = ( | 0 〉 ± e -iω 0 t | 1 〉 ) / √ 2. This corresponds to the free induction decay observed in a Ramsey experiment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28Due to the presence of the resonant field, the degeneracy between |±> is lifted and the states are separated by the energy ħω1, where ω1 ≪ ω0 is the Rabi frequency of the drive field.
“Due to the presence of the resonant field the degeneracy between |±〉 is lifted and the states are separated by the energy ℏ ω 1 , where ω 1 ≪ ω 0 is the Rabi frequency of the drive field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Dynamical decoupling · p. 26Since the filter function is dominated by the first harmonic (k = 1), the frequency corresponding to a certain τ is 1/(2τ).
“Since the filter function is dominated by the first harmonic ( k = 1) the frequency corresponding to a certain τ is 1 / (2 τ ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30The QFT is replaced by measurement and classical feedback, which can be performed using a single qubit sensor.
“The QFT is thus replaced by measurement and classical feedback, which can be performed using a single qubit sensor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 29The phase estimation problem can be generalized to estimating the phase shift φ imparted by passage through an interferometer or exposure to an external field.
“This problem can be generalized to estimating the phase shift φ imparted by passage through an interferometer or exposure to an external field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30The quantum phase estimation algorithm scales linearly with the number of applications of U, which is proportional to the total measurement time T.
“Hence, the algorithm scales linearly with the number of applications of ˆ U which in turn is proportional to the total measurement time T .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. T 1 relaxometry · p. 27Because T1 can be very long, very high sensitivities are in principle possible, assuming that the resonance is not skewed by low-frequency noise.
“Because T 1 can be very long, very high sensitivities are in principle possible, assuming that the resonance is not skewed by low-frequency noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30The key idea of adaptive phase estimation is to first measure the least significant bit of φ, subtract this value from the applied phase in the measurement of the next significant bit, and repeat in ascending order of the bits.
“The key idea of adaptive phase estimation is to first measure the least significant bit of φ , represented by the lowest qubit in Fig. 12(b). In the measurement of the next significant bit, this value is subtracted from the applied phase.”
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
“This procedure is then repeated in ascending order of the bits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28The sensitivity of the measurement is proportional to the slope of the Ramsey fringe and reaches its optimum when t ≈ T2*.
“The sensitivity of the measurement, on the other hand, is proportional to the slope of the Ramsey fringe and reaches its optimum when t ≈ T ∗ 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28Since dressed state relaxometry does not require sweeping a static control field for adjusting the probe frequency, it is more versatile than standard T1 relaxometry.
“In addition, since dressed state relaxometry does not require sweeping a static control field for adjusting the probe frequency, it is more versatile than standard T 1 relaxometry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31The implementation by Bonato et al. (2016) scaled the number of resources N_m linearly according to a formula with typical values G=5 and F=2.
“The implementation by Bonato, C. et al. , 2016, for example, scaled the number of resources N m linearly according to”
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
“with typical values of G = 5 and F = 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bonato, C. et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29For the improved protocol, the maximum allowed signal is set by the shortest sensing time, V_max = π/(γt_0), and the smallest detectable signal is determined by the longest sensing time, V_min ≈ 2/(γC√(t_M T)).
“The maximum allowed signal is then set by the shortest sensing time, V max = π/ ( γt 0 ), while the smallest detectable signal is determined by the longest sensing time, V min ≈ 2 / ( γC √ t M T ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. T ∗ 2 and T 2 relaxometry · p. 28Because a phase flip does not require energy, the spectral density is probed at zero frequency.
“Because a phase flip does not require energy, the spectral density is probed at zero frequency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28For a very large detuning, the effective frequency becomes similar to the detuning (ω_eff ≈ Δω), and the drive field only enters as a scaling factor for the spectral density.
“For a very large detuning the effective frequency becomes similar to the detuning ω eff ≈ ∆ ω , and the drive field only enters as a scaling factor for the spectral density.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29Because T ∝ t_M due to exponentially growing interrogation times, the dynamic range of the improved protocol scales as DR ∝ T.
“Because T ∝ t M due to the exponentially growing interrogation times, the dynamic range of the improved protocol scales as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30The QFT recovers the phase φ from the Fourier series and places the register in a state whose measurement directly yields a digital representation of the phase φ.
“The QFT recovers the phase φ from the Fourier series (109) and places the register in state”
- Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
“A measurement of the register directly yields a digital representation of the phase φ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30In quantum sensing, phase tagging by back-action is replaced by the exposure of each qubit to an external field for a time 2^m t_0 (or passage through an interferometer of length 2^m l_0).
“In quantum sensing, phase tagging by back-action is replaced by the exposure of each qubit to an external field for a time 2 m t 0 (or passage through an interferometer of length 2 m l 0 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30Quantum phase estimation is the core component of Shor's algorithm, where it is used to compute discrete logarithms with polynomial time effort.
“Quantum phase estimation is the core component of Shor's algorithm, where it is used to compute discrete logarithms with polynomial time effort (Shor, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shor, 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Dynamical decoupling · p. 25For large cycle numbers, the filter function Y_{n_c,τ_c}(ω) presents sharp peaks at multiples of the inverse cycle time τ_c^{-1}, and it can be approximated by a series of δ functions.
“For large cycle numbers, Y n c ,τ c ( ω ) presents sharp peaks at multiples of the inverse cycle time τ -1 c , and it can be approximated by a series of δ functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29Using exponentially growing sensing times t_m = 2^m t_0 allows an intuitive interpretation: subsequent measurements estimate subsequent digits of a binary expansion of the signal.
“Although other scheduling is possible, this choice allows for an intuitive interpretation: subsequent measurements estimate subsequent digits of a binary expansion of the signal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25The filter function plays the role of a transfer function, and the decay of coherence is captured by the overlap with the noise spectrum S_V(ω).
“Thus, the filter function plays the role of a transfer function, and the decay of coherence is captured by the overlap with the noise spectrum S V ( ω ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29Adding an additional measurement step increases both precision and measurement duration t by a factor of two, such that precision scales linearly with total acquisition time T.
“This scaling is obvious from an order-of-magnitude estimate: adding an additional measurement step increases both precision and measurement duration t by a factor of two, such that precision scales linearly with total acquisition time T .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31In practical implementations, the measurement of each digit is repeated multiple times or performed on multiple parallel qubits.
“In practical implementations (Higgins et al. , 2007), the measurement of each digit is repeated multiple times or performed on multiple parallel qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31Adaptive estimation is technically more demanding since real-time feedback is involved, which often requires dedicated hardware.
“Adaptive estimation is technically more demanding since real-time feedback is involved, which often requires dedicated hardware (such as field-programmable gate arrays or a central processing unit) for the fast decision making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33They have been used not only for sensing but also for enhanced lithography.
“They have been used not only for sensing but also for enhanced lithography (Boto et al. , 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boto et al., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31The proposals of Shor, Kitaev and Griffiths were followed by a decade where research towards Heisenberg-limited measurements focused mostly on the use of entangled states, such as the N00N state.
“The proposals of Shor (Shor, 1994), Kitaev (Kitaev, 1995) and Griffiths (Griffiths and Niu, 1996) were followed by a decade where research towards Heisenberglimited measurements has focused mostly on the use of entangled states, such as the N00N state (see Section IX).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Shor, 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kitaev, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Griffiths and Niu, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33Then, the interrogation time also needs to be reduced by a factor M and no net advantage in sensitivity can be obtained.
“Then, the interrogation time also needs to be reduced by a factor M and no net advantage in sensitivity can be obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33One of the most impressive applications of squeezed states of light has been the sensitivity enhancement of the LIGO gravitational wave detector, obtained by injecting vacuum squeezed states in the interferometer.
“One of the most impressive application of squeezed states of light (Ligo Collaboration', 2011; Schnabel et al. , 2010; Walls, 1983) has been the sensitivity enhancement of the LIGO gravitational wave detector (Collaboration, 2013), obtained by injecting vacuum squeezed states in the interferometer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ligo Collaboration', 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schnabel et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Walls, 1983
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31All of the above variants of phase estimation achieve a DR ∝ T scaling of the dynamic range.
“All of the above variants of phase estimation achieve a DR ∝ T scaling of the dynamic range.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31Shortly after, both variants were translated into protocols for spin-based quantum sensing.
“Shortly after, both variants have been translated into protocols for spin-based quantum sensing (Said et al. , 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Said et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32Squeezed states have been proposed early on to achieve the Heisenberg limit and have recently shown exceptional sensitivity.
“In particular, squeezed states (Caves, 1981; Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993; Wineland et al. , 1992) have been proposed early on to achieve the Heisenberg limit and thanks to experimental advances have recently shown exceptional sensitivity (Hosten et al. , 2016a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Caves, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wineland et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33N00N states have been conceived to improve interferometry.
“Similar to GHZ states, N00N states have been conceived to improve interferometry (Lee et al. , 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32Optimal densities have been calculated both for atomic vapor magnetometers and ensembles of NV centers.
“Optimal densities have been calculated both for atomic vapor magnetometers (Budker and Romalis, 2007) and ensembles of NV centers (Taylor et al. , 2008; Wolf et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Budker and Romalis, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Taylor et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wolf et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33This allows using an M-times shorter interrogation time or achieving an improvement of the sensitivity by a factor √M.
“This allows using an M -times shorter interrogation time or achieving an improvement of the sensitivity (calculated from the QCRB) by a factor √ M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31Here too, acquisition time scales with the significance of the bit measured to achieve the Heisenberg limit.
“Here, too, acquisition time scales with the significance of the bit measured to achieve the Heisenberg limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32The standard quantum limit can be overcome by using quantum-enhanced sensing strategies to reach a more fundamental limit where the uncertainty σ_p scales as 1/M.
“The standard quantum limit can be overcome by using quantum-enhanced sensing strategies to reach a more fundamental limit where the uncertainty σ p (Eq. ( 25)) scales as 1 /M .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32The sensitivity is then expressed per unit volume (∝ meters^{-3/2}).
“The sensitivity is then expressed per unit volume ( ∝ meters -3 / 2 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33Still, N00N states are very fragile and they are afflicted by a small dynamic range.
“Still, 'N00N' states are very fragile (Bohmann et al. , 2015) and they are afflicted by a small dynamic range.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bohmann et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31Experimentally, Bayesian estimation is usually simple to implement because no real-time feedback is needed and the phase estimation can be performed a posteriori.
“Experimentally, Bayesian estimation is usually simple to implement because no real-time feedback is needed and the phase estimation can be performed a posteriori .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33Squeezed states are promising for quantum-limited sensing as they can reach sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.
“Squeezed states are promising for quantum-limited sensing as they can reach sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33The √M advantage in sensitivity is usually compensated by the GHZ state's increased decoherence rate, which is an issue common to most entangled states.
“Unfortunately, the √ M advantage in sensitivity is usually compensated by the GHZ state's increased decoherence rate (Huelga et al. , 1997), which is an issue common to most entangled states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huelga et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31The experiment was subsequently extended to a nonadaptive version.
“The experiment has subsequently been extended to a nonadaptive version (Higgins et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31Weak measurements have been more generally proposed to enhance sensing protocols, but their ultimate usefulness is still under debate.
“Weak measurements have been more generally proposed to enhance sensing protocols (), but their ultimate usefulness is still under debate ().”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33Using an M-particle interferometer, one can prepare an entangled Fock state.
“Using an M -particle interferometer, one can prepare an entangled Fock state,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32Entanglement-enhanced sensing has been pioneered with atomic systems, especially atomic clocks.
“Entanglement-enhanced sensing has been pioneered with atomic systems, especially atomic clocks (Giovannetti et al. , 2004; Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Giovannetti et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leibfried et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Experimental realizations · p. 31A similar performance - 1/T scaling and an increased dynamic range - may be achieved by weak measurement protocols, which continuously track the evolution of the phase over the sensing sequence.
“As a final remark, we note that a similar performance - 1 /T scaling and an increased dynamic range - may be achieved by weak measurement protocols, which continuously track the evolution of the phase over the sensing sequence (Kohlhaas et al. , 2015; Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kohlhaas et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32Achieving the Heisenberg limit requires reducing the variance of a chosen quantum observable at the expense of the uncertainty of a conjugated observable.
“Achieving the Heisenberg limit requires reducing the variance of a chosen quantum observable at the expenses of the uncertainty of a conjugated observable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32This limit is also known as the Heisenberg limit.
“This limit is also known as the Heisenberg limit .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 32The simplest example of the benefits of an entangled state for quantum sensing is given by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.
“To understand the benefits that an entangled state can bring to quantum sensing, the simplest example is given by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33Squeezed states of light have been introduced by Caves (1981) as a means to reduce noise in interferometry experiments.
“Squeezed states of light have been introduced by Caves, 1981, as a mean to reduce noise in interferometry experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caves, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31The variants differ by a constant offset.
“They differ, however, by a constant offset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 32The sensing scheme with GHZ states is similar to a Ramsey protocol, but if M qubit probes are available, the preparation and readout pulses are replaced by entangling operations.
“The sensing scheme is similar to a Ramsey protocol, however, if M qubit probes are available, the preparation and readout pulses are replaced by entangling operations (Fig. 13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33This has led to the quest for different entangled states that could be more resilient to decoherence.
“This has led to the quest for different entangled states that could be more resilient to decoherence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33They were first introduced by Yurke (1986) in the context of neutron Mach-Zender interferometry as the fermionic 'response' to the squeezed states proposed by Caves (1981) for Heisenberg metrology.
“They were first introduced by Yurke, 1986, in the context of neutron Mach-Zender interferometry as the fermionic 'response' to the squeezed states proposed by Caves, 1981, for Heisenberg metrology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yurke, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Caves, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32State squeezing is routinely applied in optical systems, such as optical interferometers.
“In parallel, state squeezing is routinely applied in optical systems, such as optical interferometers (Ligo Collaboration', 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ligo Collaboration', 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31Quantum phase estimation by the QFT requires many entangled qubits.
“Quantum phase estimation by the QFT, finally, requires many entangled qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32Apart from an obvious gain in readout sensitivity, multiple qubits allow for the implementation of second-generation quantum techniques, including entanglement and state squeezing, which provide a true 'quantum' advantage that cannot be realized with classical sensors.
“Apart from an obvious gain in readout sensitivity, multiple qubits allow for the implementation of second-generation quantum techniques, including entanglement and state squeezing, which provide a true 'quantum' advantage that cannot be realized with classical sensors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33Comparing with the Ramsey protocol, preparing a GHZ state enhances the oscillation frequency of the signal by a factor M, while the shot noise is unchanged since only one qubit is measured.
“Comparing this result with what obtained in Sec. IV.C, we see that the oscillation frequency of the signal is enhanced by a factor M by preparing a GHZ state, while the shot noise is unchanged, since we still measure only one qubit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34While this is difficult to obtain for large qubit numbers, recent advances show great promise.
“While this is difficult to obtain for large qubit numbers, recent advances show great promise (Hume et al. , 2013; Zhang et al. , 2012) (see also next section on alternative detection methods).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hume et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34However, imperfections in this measurement limits the sensitivity, since achieving the Heisenberg limit requires single-particle state detection.
“However, imperfections in this measurement limits the sensitivity, since achieving the Heisenberg limit requires single-particle state detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34Spin squeezing can also be implemented in qubit systems following the original proposal by Kitagawa and Ueda (1993).
“Spin squeezing can be also implemented in qubit systems (Auccaise et al. , 2015; Bennett et al. , 2013; Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009; Sinha et al. , 2003) following the original proposal by Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Auccaise et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bennett et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 35Compared to dynamical decoupling schemes, qubit protection covers the entire noise spectrum and is not limited to low-frequency noise.
“Compared to dynamical decoupling schemes, qubit protection covers the entire noise spectrum and is not limited to low-frequency noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36Since QEC works independently of noise frequency, distinct operators for the signal and noise interactions are required.
“Since QEC works independently of noise frequency, distinct operators for the signal and noise interactions are required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36In this scheme, which has recently been implemented with NV centers, the qubit sensor detects a signal along one axis while being protected against noise along a different axis.
“In this scheme, which has recently been implemented with NV centers (Unden et al. , 2016), the qubit sensor detects a signal along one axis ( e.g. , a phase) while being protected against noise along a different axis ( e.g. , against bit flip).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Unden et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34The metrology squeezing parameter was proposed by Wineland et al. (1992).
“The metrology squeezing parameter, proposed by Wineland et al. , 1992, is then”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wineland et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36The code |0〉_L = |000〉 and |1〉_L = |111〉 can correct against a single qubit flip error.
“For example, the code | 0 〉 L = | 000 〉 and | 1 〉 L = | 111 〉 can correct against a single qubit flip error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34From the commutation relationship for the collective angular momentum, one can naturally define a squeezing parameter ξ < 1 for squeezed states.
“For example, from the commutation relationship for the collective angular momentum, ∆ J α ∆ J β ≥ |〈 J γ 〉| , one can naturally define a squeezing parameter”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35Retrieval uses the same two c-NOT gates in reverse order.
“Retrieval uses the same two c-NOT gates in reverse order.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34During the free evolution (step 3) an enhanced phase can be acquired, similar to what happens for entangled states.
“Then, during the free evolution (step 3) an enhanced phase can be acquired, similar to what happens for entangled states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34The most common sensing protocols with squeezed states forgo step 4, and directly measure the population difference between the state |0> and |1>.
“The most common sensing protocols with squeezed states forgo step 4, and directly measure the population difference between the state | 0 〉 and | 1 〉 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34To quantify the advantage of squeezed states in sensing, it is advantageous to directly relate squeezing to the improved sensitivity.
“To quantify the advantage of squeezed states in sensing, it is advantageous to directly relate squeezing to the improved sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34Early demonstrations of spin squeezing were obtained by entangling trapped ions via their shared motional modes, using repulsive interactions in a Bose-Einstein condensate, or partial projection by measurement.
“Early demonstrations of spin squeezing were obtained by entangling trapped ions via their shared motional modes (Meyer et al. , 2001), using repulsive interactions in a Bose-Einstein condensate (Esteve et al. , 2008), or partial projection by measurement (Appel et al. , 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Meyer et al., 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Esteve et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Appel et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34The degree of spin squeezing can be measured by several parameters.
“The degree of spin squeezing can be measured by several parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35Correlation spectroscopy uses two sensing periods interrupted by a waiting time t1.
“A first example includes correlation spectroscopy, where two sensing periods are interrupted by a waiting time t 1 (Laraoui and Meriles, 2013; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Laraoui and Meriles, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34A different strategy is to follow more closely the sensing protocol for entangled states, and refocus the squeezing (reintroducing step 4) before readout.
“A different strategy is to follow more closely the sensing protocol for entangled states, and refocus the squeezing (reintroducing step 4) before readout (Davis et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36These recent results hint at the potential of QEC for sensing which has just about begun to being explored.
“These recent results hint at the potential of QEC for sensing which has just about begun to being explored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33Squeezed states are characterized by a reduced uncertainty in one observable at the expense of another observable.
“Squeezed states are then characterized by a reduced uncertainty in one observable at the expense of another observable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35For an electron-nuclear qubit pair, c-NOT gates have been implemented both by selective pulses and using coherent rotations.
“For the example of an electron-nuclear qubit pair, c-NOT gates have been implemented both by selective pulses (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016) and using coherent rotations (Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pfender et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 35Quantum error correction suppresses noise according to spatial symmetry, and not according to frequency.
“Thus, quantum error correction suppresses noise according to spatial symmetry, and not according to frequency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ C. Quantum error correction · p. 36The simplest code is the 3-qubit repetition code, which corrects against one-axis noise with depth one (up to one error acting on one qubit).
“The simplest code is the 3-qubit repetition code, which corrects against one-axis noise with depth one (that is, it can correct up to one error acting on one qubit).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33The description of squeezed states is simplified by the use of a single collective angular-momentum variable.
“However, the description of squeezed states is simplified by the use of a single collective angular-momentum variable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Parity measurements · p. 34In both cases, coupling of the quantum system to the detection apparatus is inefficient, often because strong coupling would destroy the very quantum state used in the metrology task.
“In both cases, coupling of the quantum system to the detection apparatus is inefficient, often because strong coupling would destroy the very quantum state used in the metrology task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Squeezing · p. 34A simple quantum sensing scheme could be constructed by replacing step 2 with the preparation of a squeezed state, so that |ψ_0> is a squeezed state.
“In this context, a simple quantum sensing scheme, following the procedure in Sec. IV.C, could be constructed by replacing step 2 with the preparation of a squeezed state, so that | ψ 0 〉 is a squeezed state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Parity measurements · p. 34Metrology schemes often require single qubit readout or the measurement of complex, many-body observables.
“Metrology schemes often require single qubit readout or the measurement of complex, many-body observables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Squeezing · p. 33While for typical states the uncertainty in the two observables is on the same order, it is possible to redistribute the fluctuations in the two conjugate observables.
“While for typical states the uncertainty in the two observables is on the same order, it is possible to redistribute the fluctuations in the two conjugate observables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37Overall, quantum sensing has the potential to fundamentally transform our measurement capabilities, enabling higher sensitivity and precision, new measurement types, and covering atomic up to macroscopic length scales.
“Overall, quantum sensing has the potential to fundamentally transform our measurement capabilities, enabling higher sensitivity and precision, new measurement types, and covering atomic up to macroscopic length scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
- Rests on an assumption: Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
- Rests on an assumption: NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 36These tools allow operation of the sensor over a wide signal frequency range, can be adjusted to maximize sensitivity and dynamic range, and allow discrimination of different types of signals by symmetry or vector orientation.
“In particular, these allow operation of the sensor over a wide signal frequency range, can be adjusted to maximize sensitivity and dynamic range, and allow discrimination of different types of signals by symmetry or vector orientation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37A better understanding of decoherence in a particular implementation of a quantum system can help the adoption of strategies to protect the qubit, and guide the engineering and materials development.
“A better understanding of decoherence in a particular implementation of a quantum system can help the adoption of strategies to protect the qubit, and guide the engineering and materials development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37Quantum sensing has become an important resource for quantum technologies as it provides much insight into the 'environment' of qubits, especially through decoherence spectroscopy.
“Vice versa, quantum sensing has become an important resource for quantum technologies as it provides much insight into the 'environment' of qubits, especially through decoherence spectroscopy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 36While many experiments so far made use of single qubit sensors, strategies to implement entangled multi-qubit sensors with enhanced capabilities and higher sensitivity are just beginning to be explored.
“While many experiments so far made use of single qubit sensors, strategies to implement entangled multi-qubit sensors with enhanced capabilities and higher sensitivity are just beginning to be explored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37The border region between quantum sensing and quantum simulation is becoming a fertile playground for emulating and detecting many-body physics phenomena.
“The border region between quantum sensing and quantum simulation, in addition, is becoming a fertile playground for emulating and detecting many-body physics phenomena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ XI. OUTLOOK · p. 36Over the last decade, and especially in the last few years, a comprehensive toolset has been established that can be applied to any type of quantum sensor.
“Over the last decade, and especially in the last few years, a comprehensive toolset has been established that can be applied to any type of quantum sensor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.
“More recently, quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within the area of quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications.
“However, since quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications, we will mostly focus on these definitions and discuss them extensively in this review.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In most situations the coupling between a quantum sensor and an external parameter is either linear or quadratic.
“In most situations the coupling is either linear ( q = 1) or quadratic ( q = 2).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Charged systems, like trapped ions, are sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems mainly respond to magnetic fields.
“Charged systems, like trapped ions, will be sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems will mainly respond to magnetic fields.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian H = H0 + HV(t) + Hcontrol(t).
“For the following discussion, we will assume that the quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian”
The authors state this as an assumption.
H0 is known and Hcontrol(t) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.
“We will assume that ˆ H 0 is known and that ˆ H control ( t ) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The signal is weak.
“When the signal is weak (which is assumed here) ˆ H V ( t ) adds a small perturbation to ˆ H 0 .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The initialization basis {|0〉,|1〉} and the readout basis {|0'〉,|1'〉} are the same and U_b = U_a†.
“For simplicity we assume that the initialization basis {| 0 〉 , | 1 〉} and the readout basis {| 0 ′ 〉 , | 1 ′ 〉} are the same and that ˆ U b = ˆ U † a , but this is not required.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The readout is projective.
“We assume that the readout is projective, although more general positive-operator-valuedmeasure (POVM) measurements may be possible (Nielsen and Chuang, 2000).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
β = 1.
“Since β is a constant of time, we will assume β = 1 in the following for reasons of simplicity.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones in Section VI.
“In this Section VI, we will assume that the signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones and our goal will be to determine the signal's amplitude, frequency, phase or overall waveform.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t.
“To illustrate this, we assume that the AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t_s for the Allan variance.
“Assuming that the sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t s yielding the signal x j = x ( t j ) = x ( jt s ), the Allan variance is defined as”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
“Assuming that the estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased, ∆ V N obeys the so-called Cram´ er-Rao bound”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A projective measurement in the σ_x basis is performed for the Fisher information.
“If we assume to perform a projective measurement in the σ x basis, {|±〉} = { 1 √ 2 ( | 0 〉±| 1 〉 ), giving the outcome probabilities p ( x ± | V ) = 〈±| ρ ( V ) |±〉 , the Fisher information is”
The authors state this as an assumption.
t_m ≪ t for the exact optimum solution in slope detection.
“Assuming t m ≪ t , we can find an exact optimum solution with respect to t .”
The paper relies on this without support.
Signals are static and deterministic in the earlier sections.
“So far we have implicitly assumed that signals are static and deterministic.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The stochastic signal V(t) is Gaussian.
“For the following analysis we will assume that the stochastic signal V ( t ) is Gaussian.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The autocorrelation function of V(t) decays on a time scale t_c shorter than the sensing time t, such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.
“decays on a time scale t c that is shorter than the sensing time t , such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
“Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
“Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise process is approximately Markovian.
“The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.
“The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate.
“Since the noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate, the correction steps can be performed at a much slower rate compared to dynamical decoupling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
“In fact, quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use, and have installed themselves as the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
“Likewise, atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
“Notably, NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantum sensors can detect and measure physical phenomena at the quantum level, and quantum communication systems can securely transmit information over long distances.
“These include quantum sensors which can detect and measure physical phenomena at the quantum level and quantum communication systems which can securely transmit information over long distances [37].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Section A, “Quantum sensing” (p. 3), supports the sensor portion: it describes using a quantum object to measure a physical quantity. The Introduction (p. 2) mentions quantum cryptography, but our copy does not say that quantum communication systems securely transmit information over long distances. That portion of the sentence is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredQuantum sensors can detect and sense phenomena at unprecedented sensitivity levels, opening up new possibilities for surveillance and security.
“Quantum sensors can detect and sense phenomena at unprecedented sensitivity levels, opening up new possibilities for surveillance and security (Degen et al., 2017).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017
The Outlook (pp. 36–37) describes quantum sensors as highly sensitive and capable of expanding measurement applications; it calls some existing devices the most sensitive magnetic-field detectors available. Neither those passages nor the passages retrieved for surveillance and security connect that capability to surveillance or security applications. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredQuantum sensors operate by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to improve their sensitivity and accuracy.
“Quantum sensors operate by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to improve their sensitivity and accuracy (Dowling, 2003; Degen et al., 2017; Jaeger, 2018).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017
Quantum technologies such as quantum sensing might enhance the quality of imaging data of biomolecular structures and improve the quality of data for further classical or quantum computations.
“More generally, quantum technologies, such as quantum sensing, [243] might enhance the quality of imaging data of biomolecular structures (see e. g.Ref. [244]) and, therefore, improve the quality of the data on which further classical or quantum computations would be based.”
From Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology** (2023) · cites this paper as [243]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Continuous sampling cites the wrong figure panel
MinorThe text points to Fig. 8(b) for continuous sampling, but the caption labels panel (b) as the correlation sequence and panel (c) as continuous sampling.
“A second approach is the continuous sampling of a signal, illustrated in Fig. 8(b).”
“(b) Correlation sequence. Two multipulse sequences are interrupted by an incremented delay time t 1 . Because the multipulse sequences are phase sensitive, the total phase accumulated after the second multipulse sequence oscillates with f ac t 1 . The maximum t 1 is limited by the relaxation time T 1 , rather than the typically short decoherence time T 2 . (c) Continouous sampling.”
Single-ion clock record conflicts with listed uncertainties
MinorThe passage says single-ion clocks hold the accuracy record, but its listed uncertainty for the strontium ensemble clock is smaller than that for the single-ion ytterbium clock. On the passage's own comparison, the ensemble clock is more accurate.
“Single-ion atomic clocks currently detain the record for the most accurate optical clocks”
“with uncertainties of 2 . 1 × 10 18 for a 87 Sr ensemble clock (Nicholson et al. , 2015) and 3 . 2 × 10 18 for a single a single trapped 171 Yb (Huntemann et al. , 2016).”
Cites
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895 · see citing works
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,449 · see citing works
The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism
Abragam, A., & Hebel, L. C. (1961) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1937646 · Cited by 15,999 · see citing works
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713 · see citing works
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515 · see citing works
Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K., & Tao, T. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20124 · Cited by 7,036 · see citing works
Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments
Carr, H. Y., & Purcell, E. M. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.94.630 · Cited by 6,445 · see citing works
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J., & Marquardt, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 · Cited by 5,703 · see citing works
Hahn, E. L. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.80.580 · Cited by 5,089 · see citing works
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597 · see citing works
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479 · see citing works
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894 · see citing works
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796 · see citing works
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202 · see citing works
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176 · see citing works
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,014 · see citing works
Statistics of atomic frequency standards
Allan, D. W. (1966) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1966.4634 · Cited by 2,692 · see citing works
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582 · see citing works
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 · Cited by 2,440 · see citing works
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386 · see citing works
Quantum Measurement and Control
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813948 · Cited by 2,203 · see citing works
Clarke, J. L., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07128 · Cited by 2,061 · see citing works
Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions
Balasubramanian, G., Chan, I. Y., Kolesov, R. L., Al-Hmoud, M. M. A., Tisler, J., Shin, C. S., Kim, C., Wójcik, A. K., Hemmer, P., Krueger, A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07278 · Cited by 2,007 · see citing works
Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond
Maze, J. R., Stanwix, P. L., Hodges, J. S., Hong, S., Taylor, J. M., Cappellaro, P., Jiang, L., Dutt, M. V. G., Togan, E., Zibrov, A. S., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07279 · Cited by 1,993 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator
O’Connell, A. D., Hofheinz, M., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lenander, M., Lucero, E. A., Neeley, M., Sank, D., Wang, H., Weides, M. P., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08967 · Cited by 1,968 · see citing works
High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution
Taylor, J. M., Cappellaro, P., Childress, L., Jiang, L., Budker, D., Hemmer, P., Yacoby, A., Walsworth, R. L., & Lukin, M. D. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1075 · Cited by 1,966 · see citing works
Self-citationNanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell
Kucsko, G., Maurer, P. C., Yao, N. Y., Kubo, M., Noh, H. J., Lo, P. K., Park, H., & Lukin, M. D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12373 · Cited by 1,961 · see citing works
Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond
Balasubramanian, G., Neumann, P., Twitchen, D. J., Markham, M., Kolesov, R. L., Mizuochi, N., Isoya, J., Achard, J., Beck, J., Tisler, J., et al. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2420 · Cited by 1,944 · see citing works
Walls, D. F. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/306141a0 · Cited by 1,943 · see citing works
Budker, D., & Romalis, M. V. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys566 · Cited by 1,923 · see citing works
Observation of Squeezed States Generated by Four-Wave Mixing in an Optical Cavity
Slusher, R. E., Hollberg, L. W., Yurke, B., Mertz, J. C., & Valley, J. F. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2409 · Cited by 1,909 · see citing works
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
Slichter, C. P. (1978) · Springer series in solid-state sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12784-1 · Cited by 1,882 · see citing works
Scanning Confocal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers
Gruber, A., Dräbenstedt, A., Tietz, C., Fleury, L., Wrachtrup, J., & von Borczyskowski, C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5321.2012 · Cited by 1,833 · see citing works
Kitagawa, M., & Ueda, M. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.5138 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot
Elzerman, J. M., Hanson, R., van Beveren, L. H. W., Witkamp, B., Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Kouwenhoven, L. P. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02693 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
Quantum estimation for quantum technology
PARIS, M. G. A. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749909004839 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer
Kominis, I. K., Kornack, T. W., Allred, J. C., & Romalis, M. V. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01484 · Cited by 1,631 · see citing works
Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit
Vion, D., Aassime, A., Cottet, A., Joyez, P., Pothier, H., Urbina, C., Esteve, D., & Devoret, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069372 · Cited by 1,624 · see citing works
Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond: Nanoscale Sensors for Physics and Biology
Schirhagl, R., Chang, K. K., Loretz, M., & Degen, C. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103659 · Cited by 1,616 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy
Rugar, D., Budakian, R., Mamin, H. J., & Chui, B. W. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02658 · Cited by 1,614 · see citing works
A Test of a New Type of Stellar Interferometer on Sirius
Brown, R. H., & Twiss, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/1781046a0 · Cited by 1,562 · see citing works
Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,554 · see citing works
Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor
Martin, J., Akerman, N., Ulbricht, G., Lohmann, T., Smet, J. H., von Klitzing, K., & Yacoby, A. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys781 · Cited by 1,539 · see citing works
A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice
Bakr, W., Gillen, J. I., Peng, A., Fölling, S., & Greiner, M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08482 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733 · Cited by 1,494 · see citing works
Rosenband, T., Hume, D. B., Schmidt, P. O., Chou, C. W., Brusch, A., Lorini, L., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Fortier, T. M., Stalnaker, J. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154622 · Cited by 1,450 · see citing works
Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond
Rondin, L., Tetienne, J., Hingant, T., Roch, J.-F., Maletinsky, P., & Jacques, V. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503 · Cited by 1,361 · see citing works
Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins
Dolde, F., Fedder, H., Doherty, M. W., Nöbauer, T., Rempp, F., Balasubramanian, G., Wolf, T., Reinhard, F., Hollenberg, L. C. L., Jelezko, F., et al. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1969 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light
Aasi, J., Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.177 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Moore, F. L., & Heinzen, D. J. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.46.r6797 · Cited by 1,135 · see citing works
Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator
(2010) · Journal Club for Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.36471/jccm_april_2010_01 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence
Monz, T., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Chwalla, M., Nigg, D., Coish, W. A., Harlander, M., Hänsel, W., Hennrich, M., & Blatt, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.130506 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sensing
Gross, D., Liu, Y.-K., Flammia, S. T., Becker, S., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.150401 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
An optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the 10−18 level
Bloom, B. J., Nicholson, T. L., Williams, J. R., Campbell, S. L., Bishof, M., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Bromley, S. L., & Ye, J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12941 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
The single-electron transistor
Kastner, M. A. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.849 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications
Natarajan, C. M., Tanner, M. G., & Hadfield, R. H. (2012) · Superconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution
Chaste, J., Eichler, A., Moser, J., Ceballos, G., Rurali, R., & Bachtold, A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.42 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Rabi Oscillations in a Large Josephson-Junction Qubit
Martinis, J. M., Nam, S. W., Aumentado, J., & Urbina, C. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.117901 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3865 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
A Closed Set of Normal Orthogonal Functions
Walsh, J. L. (1923) · American Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/2387224 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Optically programmable electron spin memory using semiconductor quantum dots
Kroutvar, M., Ducommun, Y., Heiss, D., Max Bichler, A., Schuh, D., Abstreiter, G., & Finley, J. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03008 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms
Peters, A., Chung, K. Y., & Chu, S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23655 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M., Adams, C., Adhikari, R., Affeldt, C., Allen, B., et al. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2083 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer ProblemPreprint
Kitaev, A. Y. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.isaac.2021.31 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state
Leibfried, D. G., Knill, E. H., Seidelin, S. L., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Chiaverini, J., Hume, D. B., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04251 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Ultrahigh sensitivity magnetic field and magnetization measurements with an atomic magnetometer
Dang, H. B., Maloof, A. C., & Romalis, M. V. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3491215 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the Heisenberg limit
Holland, M., & Burnett, K. R. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1355 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination
Lloyd, S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1160627 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit
Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J. S., & Oliver, W. D. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1994 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology
Riedel, M. F., Böhi, P., Li, Y., Hänsch, T. W., Sinatra, A., & Treutlein, P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08988 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances
Sedlacek, J. A., Schwettmann, A., Kübler, H., Löw, R., Pfau, T., & Shaffer, J. P. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2423 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Characterization and application of single fluorescent nanodiamonds as cellular biomarkers
Fu, C.-C., Lee, H.-Y., Chen, K., Lim, T., Wu, H.-Y., Lin, P.-K., Wei, P., Tsao, P.-H., Chang, H., & Fann, W. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605409104 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Takamoto, M., Hong, F.-L., Higashi, R., & Katori, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03541 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier
Macklin, C., O’Brien, K. P., Hover, D. J., Schwartz, M. E., Bolkhovsky, V., Zhang, X., Oliver, W. D., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8525 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
An Atomic Clock with 10 <sup>–18</sup> Instability
Hinkley, N., Sherman, J. A., Phillips, N. B., Schioppo, M., Lemke, N. D., Beloy, K., Pizzocaro, M., Oates, C. W., & Ludlow, A. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240420 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138007 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
High-Precision Nanoscale Temperature Sensing Using Single Defects in Diamond
Neumann, P., Jakobi, I., Dolde, F., Burk, C., Reuter, R., Waldherr, G., Honert, J., Wolf, T., Brunner, A., Shim, J. H., et al. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl401216y · Cited by 795 · see citing works
Precision Rotation Measurements with an Atom Interferometer Gyroscope
Gustavson, T. L., Bouyer, P., & Kasevich, M. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2046 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Single-shot readout of an electron spin in silicon
Morello, A., Pla, J. J., Zwanenburg, F. A., Chan, K. W., Tan, K. Y., Huebl, H., Möttönen, M., Nugroho, C., Yang, C., van Donkelaar, J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09392 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty
Nicholson, T. L., Campbell, S. L., Hutson, R. B., Marti, G. E., Bloom, B. J., McNally, R. L., Zhang, W., Barrett, M. D., Safronova, M. S., Strouse, G. F., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7896 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose–Einstein condensate
Estève, J., Gross, C., Weller, A., Giovanazzi, S., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07332 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy on a (5-Nanometer) 3 Sample Volume
Staudacher, T., Shi, F., Pezzagna, S., Meijer, J., Du, J., Meriles, C. A., Reinhard, F., & Wrachtrup, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231675 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Radio-Frequency Single-Electron Transistor (RF-SET): A Fast and Ultrasensitive Electrometer
Schoelkopf, R. J., Wahlgren, P., Kozhevnikov, A. A., Delsing, P., & Prober, D. E. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5367.1238 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Nanoscale Nuclear Magnetic Resonance with a Nitrogen-Vacancy Spin Sensor
Mamin, H. J., Kim, M., Sherwood, M., Rettner, C. T., Ohno, K., Awschalom, D. D., & Rugar, D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231540 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Lenz, J. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.56910 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1996) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Optical magnetic imaging of living cells
Sage, D. L., Arai, K., Glenn, D. R., DeVience, S. J., Pham, L., Rahn-Lee, L., Lukin, M. D., Yacoby, A., Komeili, A., & Walsworth, R. L. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12072 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
New, compensated Carr-Purcell sequences
Gullion, T., Baker, D. B., & Conradi, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) · doi:10.1016/0022-2364(90)90331-3 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
A robust scanning diamond sensor for nanoscale imaging with single nitrogen-vacancy centres
Maletinsky, P., Hong, S., Grinolds, M. S., Hausmann, B., Lukin, M. D., Walsworth, R. L., Loncar, M., & Yacoby, A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.50 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging
Brida, G., Genovese, M., & Berchera, I. R. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.29 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer
Krause, A. G., Winger, M., Blasius, T. D., Lin, Q., & Painter, O. J. (2012) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.245 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Neutron spin echo: A new concept in polarized thermal neutron techniques
Mezei, F. (1972) · Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei · doi:10.1007/bf01394523 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Kimmich, R., & Anoardo, E. (2004) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2004.03.002 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Huntemann, N., Sanner, C., Lipphardt, B., Tamm, C., & Peik, E. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.063001 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature
Widmann, M., Lee, S., Rendler, T., Són, N. T., Fedder, H., Paik, S., Yang, L., Zhao, N., Yang, S., Booker, I. D., et al. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4145 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Quantum Illumination with Gaussian States
Tan, S.-H., Erkmen, B. I., Giovannetti, V., Guha, S., Lloyd, S., Maccone, L., Pirandola, S., & Shapiro, J. H. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.253601 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Quantum measurement and orientation tracking of fluorescent nanodiamonds inside living cells
McGuinness, L. P., Yan, Y., Stacey, A. D., Simpson, D., Hall, L. T., Maclaurin, D., Prawer, S., Mulvaney, P. A., Wrachtrup, J., Caruso, F., et al. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.64 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device
Muhonen, J. T., Dehollain, J. P., Laucht, A., Hudson, F. E., Kalra, R., Sekiguchi, T., Itoh, K. M., Jamieson, D. N., McCallum, J. C., Dzurak, A. S., et al. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.211 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Two-Photon Diffraction and Quantum Lithography
D’Angelo, M., Chekhova, M. V., & Shih, Y. H. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.013602 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory
Biercuk, M. J., Uys, H., VanDevender, A. P., Shiga, N., Itano, W. M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07951 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Toward Heisenberg-Limited Spectroscopy with Multiparticle Entangled States
Leibfried, D., Barrett, M. D., Schaetz, T., Britton, J., Chiaverini, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097576 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
Spectroscopy Using Quantum Logic
Schmidt, P. O., Rosenband, T., Langer, C., Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., & Wineland, D. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114375 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
E.R., A. (1979) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/0022-2860(79)80357-9 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Decoherence in a superconducting quantum bit circuit
Ithier, G., Collin, E., Joyez, P., Meeson, P. J., Vion, D., Esteve, D., Chiarello, F., Shnirman, A., Makhlin, Y., Schriefl, J., et al. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.134519 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial
Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Irwin, K. D., Hilton, G. C., Vale, L. R., & Lehnert, K. W. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1090 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity
Gleyzes, S., Kuhr, S., Guerlin, C., Bernu, J., Deléglise, S., Hoff, U. B., Brune, M., Raimond, J. M., & Haroche, S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05589 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Nobel Lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary
Haroche, S. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1083 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems
Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., Bollinger, J. J., Gilligan, J. M., Heinzen, D. J., Moore, F. L., Raizen, M. G., & Wineland, D. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3554 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond
Rondin, L., Tetienne, J., Hingant, T., Roch, J.-F., Maletinsky, P., & Jacques, V. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Quantum nondemolition measurement of the photon number via the optical Kerr effect
Imoto, N., Haus, H. A., & Yamamoto, Y. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.32.2287 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications
Fagaly, R. L. (2006) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.2354545 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth's gravitational field
Несвижевский, В. В., Börner, H. G., Petukhov, A. K., Abele, H., Baeßler, S., Rueß, F. J., Stöferle, T., Westphal, A., Gagarski, A. M., Petrov, G. A., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415297a · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling
Khodjasteh, K., & Lidar, D. A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.180501 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Nuclear Spin Gyroscope Based on an Atomic Comagnetometer
Kornack, T. W., Ghosh, R. K., & Romalis, M. V. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.230801 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit
Taylor, M. A., Janoušek, J., Daria, V. R., Knittel, J., Hage, B., Bachor, H., & Bowen, W. P. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.346 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen-vacancy centers for magnetometry applications
Acosta, V. M., Bauch, E., Ledbetter, M. P., Santori, C., Fu, K. C., Barclay, P. E., Beausoleil, R. G., Linget, H., Roch, J.-F., Treussart, F., et al. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.115202 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer
Kasevich, M. A., & Chu, S. (1992) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/bf00325375 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions
Bohnet, J. G., Sawyer, B. C., Britton, J. W., Wall, M. L., Rey, A. M., Foss-Feig, M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9958 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Implementation of Cavity Squeezing of a Collective Atomic Spin
Leroux, I. D., Schleier-Smith, M., & Vuletić, V. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.073602 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
How to enhance dephasing time in superconducting qubits
Cywiński, Ł., Lutchyn, R. M., Nave, C. P., & Sarma, S. D. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.174509 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quantum logic
Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O., Urbach, E., de Leon, N. P., Choi, S., Greve, K. D., Evans, R. E., Gertner, R. S., Bersin, E. A., Müller, C., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8022 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Jing, Y. (2011) · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Quantum Noise in Mesoscopic Physics
(2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0089-5 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Spin Squeezed Atoms: A Macroscopic Entangled Ensemble Created by Light
Hald, J., Sørensen, J. L., Schori, C., & Polzik, E. S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1319 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide with millisecond coherence times
Christle, D. J., Falk, A. L., Andrich, P., Klimov, P. V., Ul‐Hassan, J., Són, N. T., Janzén, E., Ohshima, T., & Awschalom, D. D. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4144 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms
Hosten, O., Engelsen, N. J., Krishnakumar, R., & Kasevich, M. A. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16176 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor
Degen, C. L. (2008) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2943282 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Self-citationA quantum Rosetta stone for interferometry
Lee, H., Kok, P., & Dowling, J. P. (2002) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/0950034021000011536 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Subpicotesla Diamond Magnetometry
Wolf, T., Neumann, P., Nakamura, K., Sumiya, H., Ohshima, T., Isoya, J., & Wrachtrup, J. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.041001 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Entanglement and Extreme Spin Squeezing
Sørensen, A. S., & Mølmer, K. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4431 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging
Degen, C. L., Poggio, M., Mamin, H. J., Rettner, C. T., & Rugar, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812068106 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer ProblemPreprint
Kitaev, A. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Optical detection of radio waves through a nanomechanical transducer
Bagci, T., Simonsen, A., Schmid, S., Villanueva, L. G., Zeuthen, E., Appel, J., Taylor, J. M., Sørensen, A. S., Usami, K., Schließer, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13029 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Rotation sensing with a dual atom-interferometer Sagnac gyroscope
Gustavson, T. L., Landragin, A., & Kasevich, M. A. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/12/311 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Strong coupling, energy splitting, and level crossings: A classical perspective
Novotný, L. (2010) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.3471177 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Phase-preserving amplification near the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator
Bergeal, N., Schackert, F., Metcalfe, M., Vijay, R., Manucharyan, V., Frunzio, L., Prober, D. E., Schoelkopf, R. J., Girvin, S. M., & Devoret, M. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09035 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Spin-polarized muons in condensed matter physics
Blundell, S. J. (1999) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/001075199181521 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Electronic Properties and Metrology Applications of the Diamond NV − Center under Pressure
Doherty, M. W., Struzhkin, V. V., Simpson, D., McGuinness, L. P., Meng, Y., Stacey, A. D., Karle, T. J., Hemley, R. J., Manson, N. B., Hollenberg, L. C. L., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.047601 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Seeing a single photon without destroying it
Nogues, G., Rauschenbeutel, A., Osnaghi, S., Brune, M., Raimond, J. M., & Haroche, S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22275 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Magnetoencephalography with an atomic magnetometer
Xia, H., Baranga, A. B.-A., Hoffman, D., & Romalis, M. V. (2006) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2392722 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Minimum mean-squared error of estimates in quantum statistics
Helstrom, C. W. (1967) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(67)90366-0 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Semiclassical Fourier Transform for Quantum Computation
Griffiths, R. B., & Niu, C.-S. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.3228 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Quantum Noise Limited and Entanglement-Assisted Magnetometry
Wasilewski, W., Jensen, K., Krauter, H., Renema, J. J., Balabas, M. V., & Polzik, E. S. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.133601 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity
Vasyukov, D., Anahory, Y., Embon, L., Halbertal, D., Cuppens, J., Neeman, L., Finkler, A., Segev, Y., Myasoedov, Y., Rappaport, M. L., et al. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.169 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range
Eom, B. H., Day, P. K., LeDuc, H. G., & Zmuidzinas, J. S. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2356 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabricated vapour cell
Shah, V., Knappe, S. A., Schwindt, P. D. D., & Kitching, J. E. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.201 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Ion-trap measurements of electric-field noise near surfaces
Brownnutt, M., Kumph, M., Rabl, P., & Blatt, R. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1419 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit
Appel, J., Windpassinger, P., Oblak, D., Hoff, U. B., Kjærgaard, N., & Polzik, E. S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901550106 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Fluorescence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of single spins in diamond
Toyli, D. M., Casas, C. F. D. L., Christle, D. J., Dobrovitski, V. V., & Awschalom, D. D. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1306825110 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions
Shi, F., Zhang, Q., Wang, P., Sun, H., Wang, J., Rong, X., Chen, M., Ju, C., Reinhard, F., Chen, H., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2253 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental Realization of Quantum Illumination
Lopaeva, E. D., Berchera, I. R., Degiovanni, I. P., Olivares, S., Brida, G., & Genovese, M. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.153603 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Ultrasensitive force detection with a nanotube mechanical resonator
Moser, J., Güttinger, J., Eichler, A., Esplandiu, M. J., Liu, D. E., Dykman, M. I., & Bachtold, A. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.97 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
μSR studies of the vortex state in type-II superconductors
Sonier, J. E., Brewer, J. H., & Kiefl, R. F. (2000) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.72.769 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Decoherence of Flux Qubits due to 1/f Flux Noise
Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Niskanen, A. O., Nakamura, Y., & Tsai, J.-S. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.167001 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy
Schnabel, R., Mavalvala, N., McClelland, D. E., & Lam, P. K. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1122 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Atom based RF electric field sensing
Fan, H., Kumar, S., Sedlacek, J. A., Kübler, H., Karimkashi, S., & Shaffer, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/48/20/202001 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Using Entanglement Against Noise in Quantum Metrology
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Maccone, L. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.250801 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Observation of Quantum Jumps in a Superconducting Artificial Atom
Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.110502 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Colloquium: Protecting quantum information against environmental noise
Suter, D., & Álvarez, G. A. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.041001 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Repetitive Readout of a Single Electronic Spin via Quantum Logic with Nuclear Spin Ancillae
Jiang, L., Hodges, J. S., Maze, J. R., Maurer, P. C., Taylor, J. M., Cory, D. G., Hemmer, P., Walsworth, R. L., Yacoby, A., Zibrov, A. S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176496 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Submillihertz magnetic spectroscopy performed with a nanoscale quantum sensor
Schmitt, S., Gefen, T., Stürner, F. M., Unden, T., Wolff, G., Müller, C., Scheuer, J., Naydenov, B., Markham, M., Pezzagna, S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam5532 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Optical detection of magnetic resonance in a single molecule
Wrachtrup, J., von Borczyskowski, C., Bernard, J., Orrit, M., & Brown, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363244a0 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Charge Noise Spectroscopy Using Coherent Exchange Oscillations in a Singlet-Triplet Qubit
Dial, O., Shulman, M., Harvey, S. P., Bluhm, H., Umansky, V., & Yacoby, A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.146804 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
States of an Ensemble of Two-Level Atoms with Reduced Quantum Uncertainty
Schleier-Smith, M., Leroux, I. D., & Vuletić, V. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.073604 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Magnetic spin imaging under ambient conditions with sub-cellular resolution
Steinert, S., Ziem, F., Hall, L. T., Zappe, A., Schweikert, M., Götz, N. S., Aird, A., Balasubramanian, G., Hollenberg, L. C. L., & Wrachtrup, J. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2588 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Spin-Exchange Shift and Narrowing of Magnetic Resonance Lines in Optically Pumped Alkali Vapors
Happer, W., & Tang, H. (1973) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.31.273 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Kitching, J. E., Knappe, S. A., & Donley, E. A. (2011) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2011.2157679 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Generalized Uncertainty Relations: Theory, Examples, and Lorentz Invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1995) · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Charge Echo in a Cooper-Pair Box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., Yamamoto, T., & Tsai, J. S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.047901 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Scanning Single-Electron Transistor Microscopy: Imaging Individual Charges
Yoo, M. J., Fulton, T. A., Hess, H. F., Willett, R. L., Dunkleberger, L. N., Chichester, R. J., Pfeiffer, L. N., & West, K. W. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5312.579 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Magnetic Sensitivity Beyond the Projection Noise Limit by Spin Squeezing
Sewell, R. J., Koschorreck, M., Napolitano, M., Dubost, B., Behbood, N., & Mitchell, M. W. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.253605 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
New Test of Local Lorentz Invariance Using a Ne 21 − Rb − K Comagnetometer
Smiciklas, M., Brown, J. M., Cheuk, L. W., Smullin, S., & Romalis, M. V. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.171604 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Measuring the Spectrum of Colored Noise by Dynamical Decoupling
Álvarez, G. A., & Suter, D. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.230501 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Quantum sensing with arbitrary frequency resolution
Boss, J. M., Cujia, K. S., Zopes, J., & Degen, C. L. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7009 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved Quantum Metrology Using Quantum Error Correction
Dür, W., Skotiniotis, M., Fröwis, F., & Kraus, B. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.080801 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Phonon-Induced Spin-Spin Interactions in Diamond Nanostructures: Application to Spin Squeezing
Bennett, S. D., Yao, N. Y., Otterbach, J., Zoller, P., Rabl, P., & Lukin, M. D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.156402 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Experimental Demonstration of Entanglement-Enhanced Rotation Angle Estimation Using Trapped Ions
Meyer, V., Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C. R., & Wineland, D. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5870 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Broadband magnetometry and temperature sensing with a light-trapping diamond waveguide
Clevenson, H., Trusheim, M. E., Teale, C., Schröder, T., Braje, D., & Englund, D. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3291 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Quantum Noise in the Josephson Charge Qubit
Astafiev, O. V., Pashkin, Y. A., Nakamura, Y., Yamamoto, T., & Tsai, J. S. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.267007 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
(2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846380 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Magnetic Field Sensing Beyond the Standard Quantum Limit Using 10-Spin NOON States
Jones, J. A., Karlen, S. D., Fitzsimons, J. F., Ardavan, A., Benjamin, S. C., Briggs, G. A. D., & Morton, J. J. L. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170730 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Nanoscale NMR spectroscopy and imaging of multiple nuclear species
DeVience, S. J., Pham, L., Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O., Bar‐Gill, N., Belthangady, C., Casola, F., Corbett, M., Zhang, H., Lukin, M. D., et al. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.313 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Quantum Error Correction for Metrology
Kessler, E. M., Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O., & Lukin, M. D. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.150802 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Polarized Alkali-Metal Vapor with Minute-Long Transverse Spin-Relaxation Time
Balabas, M. V., Karaulanov, T. S., Ledbetter, M. P., & Budker, D. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.070801 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Manifestation of Berry’s topological phase in neutron spin rotation
Bitter, T., & Dubbers, D. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.251 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier
Hatridge, M., Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H., Clarke, J. L., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.134501 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Quantum-mechanical limitations in macroscopic experiments and modern experimental technique
Braginskii, V. B., & Vorontsov, Y. I. (1975) · Soviet Physics Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu1975v017n05abeh004362 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Spectroscopy of Surface-Induced Noise Using Shallow Spins in Diamond
Romach, Y., Müller, C., Unden, T., Rogers, L. J., Isoda, T., Itoh, K. M., Markham, M., Stacey, A. D., Meijer, J., Pezzagna, S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.017601 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Quantum enhanced estimation of a multidimensional field
Baumgratz, T., & Datta, A. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.030801 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Entangled Fock states for robust quantum optical metrology, imaging, and sensing
Huver, S. D., Wildfeuer, C. F., & Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.063828 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
High-Resolution Magnetometry with a Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate
Vengalattore, M., Higbie, J., Leslie, S. R., Guzman, J., Sadler, L. E., & Stamper-Kurn, D. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.200801 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Approaching the Heisenberg Limit without Single-Particle Detection
Davis, E. J., Bentsen, G. S., & Schleier-Smith, M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.053601 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown optical phase
Xiang, G., Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.268 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Livanov, M., 1978, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 238, 253
- van der Sar, T., 2015, Nat. Commun., 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
“antum sensing. Quantum technology has advantages for some kinds of sensing. Quantum systems can sense weak forces with better sensitivity and higher spatial resolution than other sensing technologies [19]; thus quantum sensing could have relatively near-term high-impact applications, to medicine for example. Quantum c…”
BackgroundUltrastrong coupling between light and matter
Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liberato, S. D., Savasta, S., & Nori, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-018-0006-2 · Cited by 1,507 · see citing works
Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges
Bruzewicz, C. D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, R., & Sage, J. M. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5088164 · Cited by 1,483 · see citing works
Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry
Barry, J. F., Schloss, J. M., Bauch, E., Turner, M. J., Hart, C., Pham, L., & Walsworth, R. L. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015004 · Cited by 1,239 · see citing works
Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins
Awschalom, D. D., Hanson, R., Wrachtrup, J., & Zhou, B. B. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0232-2 · Cited by 1,054 · see citing works
Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation
Liu, J., Yuan, H., Lu, X.-M., & Wang, X. (2020) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab5d4d · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Advances in photonic quantum sensing
Pirandola, S., Bardhan, B. R., Gehring, T., Weedbrook, C., & Lloyd, S. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0301-6 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics
Lachance-Quirion, D., Tabuchi, Y., Gloppe, A., Usami, K., & Nakamura, Y. (2019) · Applied Physics Express · doi:10.7567/1882-0786/ab248d · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies
Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S.-Y., & Wrachtrup, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0008-9 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning
Cerezo, M., Verdon, G., Huang, H.-Y., Cincio, Ł., & Coles, P. J. (2022) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00311-3 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Kues, M., Reimer, C., Lukens, J. M., Munro, W. J., Weiner, A. M., Moss, D. J., & Morandotti, R. (2019) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0363-0 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community view
Acín, A., Bloch, I., Buhrman, H., Calarco, T., Eichler, C., Eisert, J., Esteve, D., Gisin, N., Glaser, S. J., Jelezko, F., et al. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy
Jing, M., Hu, Y., Ma, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Xiao, L., & Jia, S. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0918-5 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quantum information science
Wasielewski, M. R., Forbes, M. D. E., Frank, N. L., Kowalski, K., Scholes, G. D., Yuen-Zhou, J. Y., Baldo, M. A., Freedman, D. E., Goldsmith, R. H., Goodson, T. G., III, et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-020-0200-5 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
A Survey of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps
Ahmed, N., Michelin, R. A., Xue, W., Ruj, S., Malaney, R., Kanhere, S. S., Seneviratne, A. P., Hu, W. S., Janicke, H., & Jha, S. K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3010226 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet
Azuma, K., Economou, S. E., Elkouss, D., Hilaire, P., Jiang, L., Lo, H., & Tzitrin, I. (2023) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.045006 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies
Bañuls, M. C., Blatt, R., Catani, J., Celi, A., Cirac, J. I., Dalmonte, M., Fallani, L., Jansen, K., Lewenstein, M., Montangero, S., et al. (2020) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Quantum sensors for biomedical applications
Aslam, N., Zhou, H., Urbach, E., Turner, M. J., Walsworth, R. L., Lukin, M. D., & Park, H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00558-3 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies
Pelucchi, E., Fagas, G., Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. R., Figueroa, E. V., Gong, Q., Hübel, H., Liu, J., Lu, C., Matsuda, N., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00398-z · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Quantum advantage in learning from experiments
Huang, H.-Y., Broughton, M., Cotler, J., Chen, S., Li, J., Mohseni, M., Neven, H., Babbush, R., Kueng, R., Preskill, J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn7293 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Advances in Magnetics Roadmap on Spin-Wave Computing
Chumak, A. V., Kaboš, P., Wu, M., Abert, C., Adelmann, C., Adeyeye, A. O., Åkerman, J. J., Aliev, F. G., Anane, A., Awad, A. A., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/tmag.2022.3149664 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear photonics
Lukin, D. M., Dory, C., Guidry, M. A., Yang, K. Y., Mishra, S. D., Trivedi, R., Radulaski, M., Sun, S., Vercruysse, D., Ahn, G. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0556-6 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Rameshti, B. Z., Kusminskiy, S. V., Haigh, J. A., Usami, K., Lachance-Quirion, D., Nakamura, Y., Hu, C. ‐., Tang, H. X., Bauer, G. E. W., & Blanter, Y. M. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.06.001 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Sub-hertz fundamental linewidth photonic integrated Brillouin laser
Gundavarapu, S., Brodnik, G. M., Puckett, M., Huffman, T., Bose, D., Behunin, R., Wu, J., Qiu, T., Pinho, C., Chauhan, N., et al. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0313-2 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit
Lachance-Quirion, D., Wolski, S. P., Tabuchi, Y., Kono, S., Usami, K., & Nakamura, Y. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz9236 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics
Clerk, A. A., Lehnert, K. W., Bertet, P., Petta, J. R., & Nakamura, Y. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement
Braun, D., Adesso, G., Benatti, F., Floreanini, R., Marzolino, U., Mitchell, M. W., & Pirandola, S. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035006 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Carbon Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Functionalization and Sensing Applications
Speranza, G. (2021) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano11040967 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Imaging with quantum states of light
Moreau, P., Toninelli, E., Gregory, T., & Padgett, M. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0056-0 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Polino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007577 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Semiconductor qubits in practice
Chatterjee, A., Stevenson, P., Franceschi, S. D., Morello, A., de Leon, N. P., & Kuemmeth, F. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00283-9 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Metasurface interferometry toward quantum sensors
Georgi, P., Massaro, M., Luo, K.-H., Sain, B., Montaut, N., Herrmann, H., Weiss, T., Li, G., Silberhorn, C., & Zentgraf, T. (2019) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-019-0182-6 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Symmetry-breaking-induced plasmonic exceptional points and nanoscale sensing
Park, J., Ndao, A., Cai, W., Hsu, L., Kodigala, A., Lepetit, T., Lo, Y., & Kanté, B. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0796-x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Colloidal Quantum Dots as Platforms for Quantum Information Science
Kagan, C. R., Bassett, L. C., Murray, C. B., & Thompson, S. M. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00831 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour
Wang, P., Luan, C.-Y., Qiao, M., Um, M., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Yuan, X., Gu, M., Zhang, J., & Kim, K. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20330-w · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Silicon carbide color centers for quantum applications
Castelletto, S., & Boretti, A. A. (2020) · Journal of Physics Photonics · doi:10.1088/2515-7647/ab77a2 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Intelligent Computing: The Latest Advances, Challenges, and Future
Zhu, S., Yu, T., Xu, T., Chen, H., Dustdar, S., Gigan, S., Gündüz, D., Hossain, E., Jin, Y., Lin, F., et al. (2023) · Intelligent Computing · doi:10.34133/icomputing.0006 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Quantum sensing with arbitrary frequency resolution
Boss, J. M., Cujia, K. S., Zopes, J., & Degen, C. L. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7009 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen Entanglement Meets Classical Communications: Quantum Teleportation for the Quantum Internet
Cacciapuoti, A. S., Caleffi, M., Meter, R. V., & Hanzo, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2020.2978071 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Colloquium : Quantum batteries
Campaioli, F., Gherardini, S., Quach, J. Q., Polini, M., & Andolina, G. M. (2024) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.96.031001 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Quantum Noise Theory of Exceptional Point Amplifying Sensors
Zhang, M., Sweeney, W. R., Hsu, C. W., Yang, L., Stone, A. D., & Jiang, L. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.180501 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide
Nagy, R., Niethammer, M., Widmann, M., Chen, Y.-C., Udvarhelyi, P., Bonato, C., Ul‐Hassan, J., Karhu, R., Ivanov, I. G., Són, N. T., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09873-9 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Characterization and Compact Modeling of Nanometer CMOS Transistors at Deep-Cryogenic Temperatures
Incandela, R. M., Lin, S., Homulle, H., Edoardo Charbon, A., Vladimirescu, A., & Sebastiano, F. (2018) · IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society · doi:10.1109/jeds.2018.2821763 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., & Zhuang, Q. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd4c3 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Engineered dissipation for quantum information science
Harrington, P. M., Mueller, E. J., & Murch, K. W. (2022) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00494-8 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits
Cai, W., Ma, Y., Wang, W., Zou, C.-L., & Sun, L. (2021) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2020.12.006 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics
McDonald, A., & Clerk, A. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19090-4 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Nanodiamonds and Their Applications in Cells
Chipaux, M., van der Laan, K. J., Hemelaar, S. R., Hasani, M., Zheng, T., & Schirhagl, R. (2018) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201704263 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
A Molecular Approach to Quantum Sensing
Yu, C.-J., von Kugelgen, S., Laorenza, D. W., & Freedman, D. E. (2021) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00737 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Roadmap on Atomtronics: State of the art and perspective
Luigi Amico, A., Boshier, M. G., Birkl, G., Minguzzi, A., Miniatura, C., Kwek, L. C., Aghamalyan, D., Ahufinger, V., Anderson, D. Z., Andrei, N., et al. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0026178 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Towards Real‐World Quantum Networks: A Review
Wei, S., Jing, B., Zhang, X., Liao, J., Yuan, C., Fan, B., Lyu, C., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., Deng, G., et al. (2022) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100219 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: a user’s manual
Carney, D., Stamp, P. C. E., & Taylor, J. M. (2018) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaf9ca · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Albarelli, F., Barbieri, M., Genoni, M. G., & Gianani, I. (2020) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126311 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Scaling Up Electronic Spin Qubits into a Three-Dimensional Metal–Organic Framework
Yamabayashi, T., Atzori, M., Tesi, L., Cosquer, G., Santanni, F., Boulon, M., Morra, E., Benci, S., Torre, R., Chiesa, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b06733 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Quantum technology for military applications
Krelina, M. (2021) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00113-y · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Challenges and Opportunities of Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems
Corcoles, A. D., Kandala, A., Javadi-Abhari, A., McClure, D. T., Cross, A. W., Temme, K., Nation, P. D., Steffen, M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2954005 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Emerging rare‐earth doped material platforms for quantum nanophotonics
Zhong, T., & Goldner, P. (2018) · Nanophotonics · doi:10.1515/nanoph-2019-0185 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Multi-parameter estimation beyond quantum Fisher information
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Górecki, W., & Guţǎ, M. (2020) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8ef3 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Gilmore, K., Affolter, M., Lewis-Swan, R. J., Barberena, D., Jordan, E., Rey, A. M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abi5226 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Coherent spin manipulation of individual atoms on a surface
Yang, K., Paúl, W., Phark, S., Willke, P., Bae, Y., Choi, T., Esat, T., Ardavan, A., Heinrich, A. J., & Lutz, C. P. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay6779 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Real-time nanodiamond thermometry probing in vivo thermogenic responses
Fujiwara, M., Sun, S., Dohms, A., Nishimura, Y., Suto, K., Takezawa, Y., Oshimi, K., Zhao, L., Sadzak, N., Umehara, Y., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba9636 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Surface Plasmonic Sensors: Sensing Mechanism and Recent Applications
Duan, Q., Liu, Y., Chang, S., Chen, H., & Chen, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21165262 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Nonadiabatic Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference
Ivakhnenko, O. V., Shevchenko, S. N., & Nori, F. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.10.002 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
A CMOS-integrated quantum sensor based on nitrogen–vacancy centres
Kim, D., Ibrahim, M. I., Foy, C. C., Trusheim, M. E., Han, R., & Englund, D. (2019) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0275-5 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
A deeper look into cybersecurity issues in the wake of Covid-19: A survey
Alawida, M., Omolara, A. E., Abiodun, O. I., & Al-Rajab, M. M. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.08.003 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Optimal metrology with programmable quantum sensors
Marciniak, C. D., Feldker, T., Pogorelov, I., Kaubruegger, R., Vasilyev, D. V., van Bijnen, R., Schindler, P., Zoller, P., Blatt, R., & Monz, T. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04435-4 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Thermometry in the quantum regime: recent theoretical progress
Mehboudi, M., Sanpera, A., & Correa, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab2828 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Quantum thermal machines and batteries
Bhattacharjee, S., & Dutta, A. (2021) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00235-3 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Quantum non-demolition detection of an itinerant microwave photon
Kono, S., Koshino, K., Tabuchi, Y., Noguchi, A., & Nakamura, Y. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0066-3 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Dynamic Framework for Criticality-Enhanced Quantum Sensing
Chu, Y., Zhang, S., Yu, B., & Cai, J. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.010502 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Quantum-Limited Atomic Receiver in the Electrically Small Regime
Cox, K. C., Meyer, D. H., Fatemi, F. K., & Kunz, P. D. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.110502 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Rydberg-atom-based digital communication using a continuously tunable radio-frequency carrier
Song, Z., Liu, H., Liu, X., Zhang, W., Zou, H., Zhang, J., & Qu, J. (2019) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.27.008848 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system
Chen, C., Jin, L., & Liu, R.-B. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab32ab · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Inverse-designed diamond photonics
Dory, C., Vercruysse, D., Yang, K. Y., Sapra, N. V., Rugar, A. E., Sun, S., Lukin, D. M., Piggott, A. Y., Zhang, J. L., Radulaski, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11343-1 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Dissipation-Based Quantum Sensing of Magnons with a Superconducting Qubit
Wolski, S. P., Lachance-Quirion, D., Tabuchi, Y., Kono, S., Noguchi, A., Usami, K., & Nakamura, Y. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.117701 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Sensitivity bounds for multiparameter quantum metrology
Gessner, M., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.130503 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Gebhart, V., Santagati, R., Gentile, A. A., Gauger, E. M., Craig, D., Ares, N., Banchi, L., Marquardt, F., Pezzè, L., & Bonato, C. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00552-1 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Photonic chip for laser stabilization to an atomic vapor with 10−11 instability
Hummon, M. T., Kang, S., Bopp, D. G., Li, Q., Westly, D., Kim, S., Fredrick, C. D., Diddams, S. A., Srinivasan, K. A., Aksyuk, V., et al. (2018) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.5.000443 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Distributed quantum phase estimation with entangled photons
Liu, L.-Z., Zhang, Y.-Z., Li, Z.-D., Zhang, R., Yin, X.-F., Fei, Y.-Y., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Xu, F., Chen, Y.-A., et al. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-020-00718-2 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Colloquium : Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quantum technologies
Luigi Amico, A., Anderson, D. Z., Boshier, M. G., Brantut, J.-P., Kwek, L. C., Minguzzi, A., & von Klitzing, W. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.041001 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Frey, N. C., Akinwande, D., Jariwala, D., & Shenoy, V. B. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c05267 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Quantum Engineering With Hybrid Magnonic Systems and Materials (Invited Paper)
Awschalom, D. D., Du, C., He, R., Heremans, F. J., Hoffmann, A., Hou, J. T., Kurebayashi, H., Li, Y., Liu, L., Novosad, V., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2021.3057799 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Five-second coherence of a single spin with single-shot readout in silicon carbide
Anderson, C. P., Glen, E. O., Zeledon, C., Bourassa, A., Jin, Y., Zhu, Y., Vorwerk, C., Crook, A. L., Abe, H., Ul‐Hassan, J., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm5912 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Quantum State Tomography with Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks
Ahmed, S., Muñoz, C. S., Nori, F., & Kockum, A. F. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.140502 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Chang, C. W. S., Vadiraj, A. M., Bourassa, J., Balaji, B., & Wilson, C. M. (2019) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.5085002 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution
Li, Y., Cai, W.-Q., Ren, J.-G., Wang, C.-Z., Yang, M., Zhang, L., Wu, H., Chang, L., Wu, J.-C., Jin, B., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08739-z · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Quantum Sensing for Energy Applications: Review and Perspective
Crawford, S. E., Shugayev, R., Paudel, H. P., Lu, P., Syamlal, M., Ohodnicki, P. R., Chorpening, B., Gentry, R. W., & Duan, Y. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100049 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Introduction to quantum optimal control for quantum sensing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond
Rembold, P., Oshnik, N., Müller, M. M., Montangero, S., Calarco, T., & Neu, E. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0006785 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Quantum Metrology with Strongly Interacting Spin Systems
Zhou, H., Choi, J., Choi, S., Landig, R., Douglas, A. M., Isoya, J., Jelezko, F., Onoda, S., Sumiya, H., Cappellaro, P., et al. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.031003 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationDiamond magnetometer enhanced by ferrite flux concentrators
Fescenko, I., Jarmola, A., Savukov, I., Kehayias, P., Šmits, J., Damron, J. T., Ristoff, N., Mosavian, N., & Acosta, V. M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023394 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Lee, C., Lawrie, B., Pooser, R., Lee, K.-G., Rockstuhl, C., & Tame, M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01028 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Robust Dynamic Hamiltonian Engineering of Many-Body Spin Systems
Choi, J., Zhou, H., Knowles, H. S., Landig, R., Choi, S., & Lukin, M. D. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.031002 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Landi, G. T., Kewming, M. J., Mitchison, M. T., & Potts, P. P. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020201 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Spin Selectivity in Photoinduced Charge-Transfer Mediated by Chiral Molecules
Abendroth, J. M., Stemer, D. M., Bloom, B. P., Roy, P., Naaman, R., Waldeck, D. H., Weiss, P. S., & Mondal, P. C. (2019) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b01876 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Demonstration of a Reconfigurable Entangled Radio-Frequency Photonic Sensor Network
Xia, Y., Li, W., Clark, W., Hart, D., Zhuang, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.150502 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors
Du, J., Shi, F., Kong, X., Jelezko, F., & Wrachtrup, J. (2024) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.96.025001 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Rzepkowski, B., & Roszak, K. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02935-8 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Coherent quantum control of nitrogen-vacancy center spins near 1000 kelvin
Liu, G., Feng, X. Y., Wang, N., Li, Q., & Liu, R. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09327-2 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Spin Readout Techniques of the Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in Diamond
Hopper, D. A., Shulevitz, H. J., & Bassett, L. C. (2018) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi9090437 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Verifying multipartite entangled Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states via multiple quantum coherences
Wei, K. X., Lauer, I., Srinivasan, S. J., Sundaresan, N., McClure, D., Toyli, D. M., McKay, D. C., Gambetta, J., & Sheldon, S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032343 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-07-25
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W3037447387
- Semantic Scholar
- e5e8fa8ecb175c8a587703a423bb88a6e8efaf58
- Cited by
- 4,045
- References
- 392
- Citations by year
- 2026: 601 · 2025: 827 · 2024: 641 · 2023: 473 · 2022: 425 · 2021: 378 · 2020: 307 · 2019: 236 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 113.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (611143)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RE 3606/1-1)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-11-1-0400, W911NF-15-1-0548)
- National Science Foundation (PHY0551153, PHY1415345)
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-03 16-1)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (200021_137520, NCCR QSIT)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum sensing, quantum sensors, precision metrology, qubits, quantum entanglement, quantum-enhanced sensitivity, timekeeping, sensor implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review