Cited by 4,045Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Quantum sensing

Open access
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., Cappellaro, P.·2017·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Quantum technologies are increasingly driving the field of precision metrology. While current techniques for sensing and recording time rely on classical devices, quantum sensors exploit quantum systems to reach unprecedented levels of precision. The working part of the sensor contains one or a few qubits, and resources like quantum entanglement are chosen and tailored to maximize sensitivity. This review introduces quantum sensing from the perspective of working experimentalists, with specific sensor implementations, concepts and methods, and recent developments.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review introduces quantum sensing as the use of quantum systems, coherence, or entanglement to measure physical quantities, focusing on qubit-based sensors and practical protocols. It synthesizes definitions, experimental platforms, sensing sequences, sensitivity limits, noise spectroscopy, adaptive methods, and entanglement-enhanced approaches.

Key findings

  • Quantum sensing is defined by three uses: a quantum object to measure a quantity, quantum coherence for measurement, and entanglement to improve sensitivity beyond classical limits; a useful quantum sensor needs discrete levels, initialization/readout, coherent manipulation, and coupling to a signal \(V(t)\).
  • The basic protocol is initialization, interaction with the signal, readout, and estimation; Ramsey and Rabi measurements illustrate static and resonant detection, while slope detection operates at \(p_0=0.5\) and variance detection at \(p_0=0\) or \(1\). Sensitivity improves with larger coupling \(\gamma\) and longer decoherence/relaxation time \(T_\chi\), with optimum sensing time near \(t \approx T_\chi\).
  • Reported sensitivities include atomic vapor magnetometers at \(100\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) approaching \(<10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), SQUIDs down to \(10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), trapped ions at \(4.6\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), NV ensembles currently limited to \(\sim 1\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), and superconducting qubit magnetic sensing at \(3.3\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) at 10 MHz.
  • Advanced methods include multipulse AC sensing with CP/PDD sequences, noise spectroscopy via filter functions and relaxometry, adaptive phase estimation achieving dynamic range scaling \(DR \propto T\), and entangled GHZ/N00N/squeezed states that can reach Heisenberg-limited sensitivity but often lose their advantage due to increased decoherence.

Methods

  • This is a review article, not a primary experimental or theoretical study; it synthesizes principles, methods, and concepts of quantum sensing from an experimentalist’s viewpoint.
  • It surveys implementations including neutral atoms, trapped ions, Rydberg atoms, atomic clocks, solid-state spins, superconducting circuits, elementary particle qubits, single electron transistors, optomechanics, and photons.
  • The main analysis uses Hamiltonian formalism, Ramsey/Rabi examples, filter functions, the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, and summary tables of sensor implementations and symbols.

Limitations

  • Paper-stated: the review mostly considers qubits, does not cover implementations in specific detail, excludes atomic clocks and photon-based sensors, and treats theory only up to the point needed to introduce key concepts.
  • Paper-stated: entanglement-enhanced sensing is limited because GHZ states suffer faster decoherence, and N00N states are fragile and have small dynamic range.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, it reports no primary data, and its numerical sensitivities are drawn from cited prior work; many equations appear as “formula-not-decoded” in the supplied text, so exact expressions cannot be verified from this text alone.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002

Cites

392 of 392 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 207 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § B. Quantum sensors · p. 3

    Many properties of more complex quantum systems can be modeled through a qubit sensor.

    “The focus on two-level systems (1) is not a severe restriction because many properties of more complex quantum systems can be modeled through a qubit sensor (Goldstein et al. , 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldstein et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § A. Neutral atoms as magnetic field sensors · p. 4

    Alkali atoms are suitable sensing qubits fulfilling the definitions of quantum sensing.

    “Alkali atoms are suitable sensing qubits fulfilling the above definitions (Kitching et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kitching et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 5

    Trapped atoms have been employed to detect and image magnetic fields at the microscale.

    “Trapped atoms have been employed to detect and image magnetic fields at the microscale, by replicating Larmor precession spectroscopy on a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate (Vengalattore et al. , 2007) and by direct driving of spin-flip transitions by microwave currents (Ockeloen et al. , 2013) or thermal radiofrequency noise in samples (Fortagh et al. , 2002; Jones et al. , 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Vengalattore et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ockeloen et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fortagh et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Trapped ions · p. 6

    The most advanced applications of trapped ions employ quantized motional levels as sensing qubits for electric fields and forces.

    “The most advanced applications employ the quantized motional levels as sensing qubits for electric fields and forces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6

    Rydberg states have become accessible in atomic vapour cells.

    “Recently, Rydberg states have become accessible in atomic vapour cells (K¨ ubler et al. , 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kübler et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 91
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 101
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 4

    Freely falling atoms have enabled the development of atomic gravimeters and gyrometers.

    “Freely falling atoms have enabled the development of atomic gravimeters (Kasevich and Chu, 1992; Peters et al. , 1999) and gyrometers (Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kasevich and Chu, 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peters et al. , 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4

    Long relaxation and coherence times in atomic vapors are achieved by coating cell walls to preserve the atomic spin upon collisions and by operating in the spin exchange relaxation-free (SERF) regime of high atomic density and zero magnetic field.

    “These long relaxation and coherence times are achieved by coating cell walls to preserve the atomic spin upon collisions, and by operating in the spin exchange relaxation-free ('SERF') regime of high atomic density and zero magnetic field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Trapped ions · p. 6

    The trapped-ion motional-level sensor has a predicted sensitivity of 500 nV/m/√Hz or 1 yN/√Hz for the force acting on the ion.

    “The sensor has a predicted sensitivity of 500 nV / m / √ Hz or 1 yN / √ Hz for the force acting on the ion (Biercuk et al. , 2010; Maiwald et al. , 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Biercuk et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maiwald et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 4

    The reduced velocity spread of cold atoms enabled sensing with longer interrogation times using spatially confined atoms, freely falling along specific trajectories in vacuum or trapped.

    “The reduced velocity spread of cold atoms enabled sensing with longer interrogation times using spatially confined atoms, freely falling along specific trajectories in vacuum or trapped.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4

    The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity.

    “The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity (Jensen et al. , 2016; Livanov et al. , 1978), which has found use in magnetoencephalography (Xia et al. , 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jensen et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Livanov et al. , 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Atomic vapors · p. 4

    Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm3 small volumes.

    “Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm 3 small volumes (Shah et al. , 2007) and have been used to demonstrate entanglement-enhanced sensing (Fernholz et al. , 2008; Wasilewski et al. , 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shah et al. , 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Cold atomic clouds · p. 5

    Sensing with cold atoms has found application in solid state physics by elucidating current transport in microscopic conductors.

    “Sensing with cold atoms has found application in solid state physics by elucidating current transport in microscopic conductors (Aigner et al. , 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aigner et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Trapped ions · p. 6

    Operation of ion traps in close proximity to surfaces remains a major challenge.

    “However, operation of ion traps in close proximity to surfaces remains a major challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Rydberg atoms · p. 6

    Rydberg atoms are remarkable quantum sensors for electric fields because the loosely confined electron is easily displaced by electric fields and motional states experience strong Stark shifts.

    “Rydberg atoms - atoms in highly excited electronic states - are remarkable quantum sensors for electric fields for a similar reason as trapped ions: In a classical picture, the loosely confined electron in a highly excited orbit is easily displaced by electric fields. In a quantum picture, its motional states are coupled by strong electric dipole transitions and experience strong Stark shifts (Her”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Herrmann et al., 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Osterwalder and Merkt, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4

    To optimize the sensitivity of a quantum sensor, the transduction parameter γ should be large and the decoherence time Tχ should be made as long as possible.

    “In order to optimize the sensitivity, γ should be large (for example, by choice of an appropriate physical realization of the sensor) and the decoherence time T χ must be made as long as possible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Trapped ions · p. 6

    Practically all trapped-ion sensing demonstrations have focused on single ions, which cannot compete with ensemble sensors such as atomic vapors in terms of absolute sensitivity.

    “Practically all sensing demonstrations have focused on single ions, which, in terms of absolute sensitivity, cannot compete with ensemble sensors such as atomic vapors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7

    Some of the earliest quantum sensors have been based on ensembles of nuclear spins.

    “Some of the earliest quantum sensors have been based on ensembles of nuclear spins.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7

    Among all solid state spins, NV centers in diamond have received by far the most attention for sensing purposes.

    “Among all solid state spins, NV centers in diamond have received by far the most attention for sensing purposes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. The sensing protocol · p. 13

    The generic quantum sensing protocol described (steps 1-7) is sufficient to describe most sensing experiments.

    “Although the above protocol is generic and simple, it is sufficient to describe most sensing experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Variance detection (quadratic detection) · p. 14

    Variance detection is especially important for detecting ac signals when their synchronization with the sensing protocol is not possible, or when the signal represents a noise source.

    “Variance detection is especially important for detecting ac signals when their synchronization with the sensing protocol is not possible (Section VI.C.4), or when the signal represents a noise source (Section VII).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7

    NV centers in a magnetic field gradient have been employed as spectrum analyzer for high frequency microwave signals.

    “As a technically less demanding application, NV centers in a magnetic field gradient have been employed as spectrum analyzer for high frequency microwave signals (Chipaux et al. , 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chipaux et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7

    In the most advanced nuclear spin gyroscope, nuclear spin precession is read out by an atomic magnetometer, which is also used for compensation of the Zeeman shift.

    “In the most advanced implementation, nuclear spin precession is read out by an atomic magnetometer, which is equally used for compensation of the Zeeman shift (Kornack et al. , 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kornack et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7

    Mechanical detection of single paramagnetic defects in silica and real-time monitoring of few-spin fluctuations have been demonstrated.

    “In addition, mechanical detection of single paramagnetic defects in silica (Rugar et al. , 2004) and real-time monitoring of few-spin fluctuations (Budakian et al. , 2005) have been demonstrated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rugar et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Budakian et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7

    Even the most advanced NV ensemble devices are currently limited to ~1 pT/√Hz and operate several orders of magnitude above the theory limit.

    “As a consequence, even the most advanced devices are currently limited to ∼ 1 pT / √ Hz (Wolf et al. , 2015) and operate several orders of magnitude above the theory limit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wolf et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7

    Optical readout of single spins has been shown with single organic molecules, optically active quantum dots, and defect centers in diamond and silicon carbide.

    “Optical readout was shown with single organic molecules (Wrachtrup et al. , 1993a,b), optically active quantum dots (Atature et al. , 2007; Kroutvar et al. , 2004; Vamivakas et al. , 2010), and defect centers in crystalline materials including diamond (Gruber et al. , 1997) and silicon carbide (Christle et al. , 2015; Widmann et al. , 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wrachtrup et al., 1993a,b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Atature et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gruber et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7

    NMR sensor probes have been developed for in-situ and dynamical field mapping in clinical MRI systems.

    “More recently, NMR sensor probes have been developed for in-situ and dynamical field mapping in clinical MRI systems (Zanche et al. , 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zanche et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § F. Solid state spins - Single spin sensors · p. 7

    Electrical readout of single spins has been demonstrated with phosphorus dopants in silicon and electrostatically-defined semiconductor quantum dots.

    “Electrical readout has been demonstrated with phosphorus dopants in silicon (Morello et al. , 2010) and electrostatically-defined semiconductor quantum dots (Elzerman et al. , 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Morello et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Elzerman et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7

    Predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT/√Hz/cm^-3/2) or gyroscopes (10^-5 rad/s/√Hz/mm^3/2) would be competitive with atomic counterparts.

    “Although these advantages are partially offset by a reduced coherence time ( T 2 &lt; 1 ms at room temperature, as compared to T 2 &gt; 1 s for vapor cells), the predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT / √ Hz / cm -3 / 2 ) (Taylor et al. , 2008) or gyroscopes (10 -5 rad / s / √ Hz / mm 3 / 2 ) (Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012; Ledbetter et al. , 2012) would be competitive with their”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Taylor et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ledbetter et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7

    NV ensemble imaging has enabled imaging of magnetic organelles in magnetotactic bacteria and microscopic magnetic inclusions in meteorites, as well as contrast-agent-based magnetic resonance microscopy.

    “Most prominently, this line of research has enabled imaging of magnetic organelles in magnetotactic bacteria (Le Sage et al. , 2013) and microscopic magnetic inclusions in meteorites (Fu et al. , 2014), as well as contrast-agent-based magnetic resonance microscopy (Steinert et al. , 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Le Sage et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fu et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Steinert et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. The sensing protocol · p. 13

    Classical continuous-wave absorption and transmission spectroscopy can be considered as an averaged variety of the generic quantum sensing protocol.

    “For example, classical continuous-wave absorption and transmission spectroscopy can be considered as an averaged variety of this protocol.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. The sensing protocol · p. 13

    The time evolution in the generic protocol can be replaced by a spatial evolution to describe a classical interferometer.

    “Also, the time evolution can be replaced by a spatial evolution to describe a classical interferometer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7

    Ensembles of NV centers are electronic spin defects in diamond that can be optically initialized and read out.

    “Much excitement has recently been sparked by ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers (NV centers) - electronic spin defects in diamond that can be optically initialized and read out.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7

    Nuclear spin gyroscope experiments reached a sensitivity of 5e-7 rad/s/√Hz, comparable to compact atomic interferometers and optical Sagnac interferometers.

    “These experiments reached a sensitivity of 5 · 10 -7 rad / s / √ Hz, which is comparable to compact implementations of atomic interferometers and optical Sagnac interferometers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kornack et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. NV center ensembles · p. 7

    Efficient fluorescence detection of large NV ensembles is difficult, while absorptive and dispersive schemes are not easily implemented.

    “First, efficient fluorescence detection of large NV ensembles is difficult, while absorptive and dispersive schemes are not easily implemented (Clevenson et al. , 2015; Jensen et al. , 2014; Le Sage et al. , 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Clevenson et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jensen et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Le Sage et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. NMR ensemble sensors · p. 7

    NMR ensemble magnetometers have sensitivity of 10 pT/√Hz, inferior to atomic counterparts.

    “Although the sensitivity of these devices (10 pT / √ Hz) (Lenz, 1990) is inferior to their atomic counterparts, they have found broad use in geology, archaeology and space missions thanks to their simplicity and robustness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lenz, 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VII. NOISE SPECTROSCOPY · p. 24

    Noise spectroscopy relies on the systematic analysis of decoherence and relaxation under different control sequences.

    “Noise spectroscopy relies on the systematic analysis of decoherence and relaxation under different control sequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Signal integration · p. 18

    Variance detection improves only ∝ T^1/4 with the integration time, while slope detection improves ∝ T^1/2.

    “We notice that variance detection improves only ∝ T 1 / 4 with the integration time, while slope detection improves ∝ T 1 / 2 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Decoherence · p. 15

    The decay time Tχ, also known as the decoherence time or relaxation time depending on the noise process, is an important figure-of-merit of the qubit, as it sets the maximum possible evolution time t available for sensing.

    “The decay time T χ , also known as the decoherence time or relaxation time depending on the noise process, is an important figure-of-merit of the qubit, as it sets the maximum possible evolution time t available for sensing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22

    When the multipulse sequence cannot be synchronized with the signal or the phase α cannot be controlled, incoherent averaging leads to phase cancellation, <φ> = 0.

    “Often, the multipulse sequence cannot be synchronized with the signal or the phase α cannot be controlled. Then, incoherent averaging leads to phase cancellation, 〈 φ 〉 = 0.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Decoherence · p. 15

    Although the underlying noise processes may be very complex, the phenomenological decoherence function χ(t) can often be approximated by a simple power law.

    “Although the underlying noise processes may be very complex, χ ( t ) can often be approximated by a simple power law,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Quantum projection noise · p. 15

    For variance detection, where ideally p0=0, the projection noise would in principle be arbitrarily low, but in any realistic experiment decoherence will shift the fringe minimum to a finite value of p.

    “For variance detection, where ideally p 0 = 0, the projection noise would in principle be arbitrarily low. In any realistic experiment, however, decoherence will shift the fringe minimum to a finite value of p (see below), where Eq. (25) holds up to a constant factor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The readout is projective.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Continuous sampling · p. 24

    Because continuous sampling no longer relies on quantum state lifetimes, the Fourier-limited resolution can be extended to arbitrary values and is only limited by total experiment duration T, and ultimately the control hardware.

    “Because continuous sampling no longer relies on quantum state lifetimes, the Fourier-limited resolution can be extended to arbitrary values and is only limited by total experiment duration T , and ultimately the control hardware.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Classical readout noise · p. 16

    Due to the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout, classical readout noise is often the dominating source of error.

    “Due to the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout, classical readout noise is often the dominating source of error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 18

    Variance detection profits more from a long coherence time Tχ than slope detection, but is more vulnerable to decoherence.

    “Thus, variance detection profits more from a long coherence time T χ than slope detection (but is, in turn, more vulnerable to decoherence).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21

    For large pulse numbers n, the sinc term becomes very peaked and the filter bandwidth Δf ≈ 1/(nτ) = 1/t (full width at half maximum) becomes very narrow.

    “For large pulse numbers n , the sinc term becomes very peaked and the filter bandwidth ∆ f ≈ 1 / ( nτ ) = 1 /t (full width at half maximum) becomes very narrow.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22

    If the amplitude V_pk is not fixed but slowly fluctuating between different measurements, the variance <φ^2> must be integrated over the probability distribution of V_pk.

    “If the amplitude V pk is not fixed, but slowly fluctuating between different measurements, the variance 〈 φ 2 〉 must be integrated over the probability distribution of V pk .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22

    For a Gaussian amplitude fluctuation with an rms amplitude V_rms, the resonant time response of the transition probability is given by Eq. (76), where I0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind.

    “A particularly important situation is a Gaussian amplitude fluctuation with an rms amplitude V rms . In this case, the resonant time response of the transition probability is”
    • Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
      “where I 0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Correlation sequences · p. 23

    In the correlation sequence method, the multipulse sequence is subdivided into two equal sensing periods of duration t_a = t/2 separated by an incremented free evolution period t1.

    “The multipulse sequence is subdivided into two equal sensing periods of duration t a = t/ 2 that are separated by an incremented free evolution period t 1 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VII. NOISE SPECTROSCOPY · p. 24

    Good knowledge of the noise spectrum can help the adoption of suitable sensing protocols (like dynamical decoupling or quantum error correction schemes) to maximize the sensitivity of the quantum sensor.

    “In particular, good knowledge of the noise spectrum can help the adoption of suitable sensing protocols (like dynamical decoupling or quantum error correction schemes) to maximize the sensitivity of the quantum sensor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21

    The pass-band frequency of CP and PDD sequences can be selected via the interpulse delay τ, while the filter width can be adjusted via the number of pulses n = t/τ (up to a maximum value of n ≈ T2/τ).

    “In particular, the pass-band frequency can be selected via the interpulse delay τ , while the filter width can be adjusted via the number of pulses n = t/τ (up to a maximum value of n ≈ T 2 /τ ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25

    Depending on the type of noise present, the decoherence function shows a different dependence on t: for white noise, χ(t) = Γt; for Lorentzian noise centered at zero frequency, χ(t) = (Γt)^3; for a generic 1/f-like decay, χ(t) = (Γt)^{a+1} with a logarithmic correction.

    “For white noise, the dephasing is Markovian and χ ( t ) = Γ t , where Γ is the decay rate. For Lorentzian noise centered at zero frequency the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) 3 . For a generic 1 /f -like decay, where the noise falls of ∝ ω a (with a around unity), the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) a +1 (Cywinski et al. , 2008; Medford et al. , 2012) with a logarithmic correct”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cywinski et al. , 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Medford et al. , 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dial et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15

    An imperfect initialization leads to a similar reduction in the observed probability δp_obs as with decoherence, but contrary to decoherence this reduction does not depend on the sensing time t.

    “An imperfect initialization leads to a similar reduction in the observed probability δp obs as with decoherence,”
    • Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
      “Contrary to the case of decoherence, this reduction does not depend on the sensing time t .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § D. Quantum Cram´ er Rao Bound for parameter estimation · p. 19

    The scaling of the quantum Cramér-Rao bound with the number of copies, N^-1/2, is a consequence of the additivity of the quantum Fisher information for tensor states ρ^⊗N, and is the well-known standard quantum limit (SQL).

    “We note that the scaling of the QCRB with the number of copies, N -1 / 2 , is a consequence of the additivity of the quantum Fisher information for tensor states ρ ⊗ N . This is the well-known standard quantum limit (SQL).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Signal-to-noise ratio · p. 17

    The number of measurements N is equal to T/(t+t_m), where T is the total available measurement time and t_m is the extra time needed to initialize, manipulate and readout the sensor.

    “In addition, the number of measurements N is equal to T/ ( t + t m ), where T is the total available measurement time and t m is the extra time needed to initialize, manipulate and readout the sensor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25

    Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t, where χ(t) is the decoherence function.

    “Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
      “where χ ( t ) is the associated decay function or decoherence function that was already discussed in the context of sensitivity (Section V).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4. Classical readout noise · p. 17

    The classical readout noise σ_p,readout is often combined with the quantum projection noise σ_p,quantum to obtain a total readout uncertainty, where C = 1/√(1+R^2) ≈ 1/√(1+4κ) is an overall readout efficiency parameter.

    “where C = 1 / √ 1 + R 2 ≈ 1 / √ 1 + 4 κ is an overall readout efficiency parameter (Taylor et al. , 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. CP and PDD sequences · p. 21

    Because k = 1 provides the strongest peak transmission, most reported experiments used this resonance.

    “The resonance order k can also be used to select the pass-band frequency, however, because k = 1 provides the strongest peak transmission, most reported experiments used this resonance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § D. Waveform reconstruction · p. 22

    Walsh dynamical decoupling sequences are a suitable basis for systematic waveform reconstruction; they apply a π pulse every time the corresponding Walsh function flips its sign.

    “A suitable basis are Walsh dynamical decoupling sequences (Hayes et al. , 2011), which apply a π pulse every time the corresponding Walsh function (Walsh, 1923) flips its sign.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hayes et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Walsh, 1923

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VII. NOISE SPECTROSCOPY · p. 24

    Noise spectroscopy is an important tool in quantum sensing, as it can provide much insight into both external signals and the intrinsic noise of the quantum sensor.

    “Noise spectroscopy is an important tool in quantum sensing, as it can provide much insight into both external signals and the intrinsic noise of the quantum sensor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Multipulse sensing sequences · p. 20

    For a harmonic signal V(t') = V_pk cos(2π f_ac t' + α), the accumulated phase for any multipulse sequence defines a weighting function W(f_ac, α).

    “This defines for any multipulse sequence a weighting function W ( f ac , α ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § D. Quantum Cram´ er Rao Bound for parameter estimation · p. 19

    To go beyond the standard quantum limit, one needs to use entangled states; simply using correlated POVMs is not sufficient.

    “To go beyond the SQL, one then needs to use entangled states (see Section IX) in particular, simply using correlated POVMs is not sufficient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Lock-in detection · p. 21

    Kotler et al., 2011, have shown that both quadratures of a signal can be recovered, allowing one to perform lock-in detection of the signal.

    “Kotler et al. , 2011, have shown that both quadratures of a signal can be recovered, allowing one to perform lock-in detection of the signal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kotler et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § E. Frequency estimation · p. 23

    In quantum sensing, most frequency estimation schemes are based on dynamical decoupling sequences.

    “In quantum sensing, most frequency estimation schemes are based on dynamical decoupling sequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Classical readout noise · p. 17

    C ≤ 1 describes the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to an ideal readout (C=1).

    “C ≤ 1 describes the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to an ideal readout ( C = 1), see Fig. 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Correlation sequences · p. 24

    The resolution can be further enhanced by long-lived auxiliary memory qubits, and resolution improvements by two-to-three orders of magnitude over dynamical decoupling spectroscopy have been demonstrated.

    “The resolution can be further enhanced by long-lived auxiliary memory qubits (see Section X) and resolution improvements by two-to-three orders of magnitude over dynamical decoupling spectroscopy have been demonstrated (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pfender et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zaiser et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22

    For CP and PDD sequences, the averaged functions are given by Eq. (74) and the peak transmission at f_ac = k/2τ is W^2 = 2/(kπ)^2.

    “and the peak transmission at f ac = k/ 2 τ is W 2 = 2 / ( kπ ) 2 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Minimum detectable signal and sensitivity · p. 17

    If C is independent of t_m, t_m should be made as short as possible.

    “Conversely, if C is independent of t m - for example, because the sensor is operated in the single-shot regime or because readout resets the sensor t m should be made as short as possible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25

    The decoherence function χ(t) can be identified with an rms phase accumulated during time t, according to the expression for variance detection, Eq. (20).

    “Quite generally, χ ( t ) can be identified with an rms phase accumulated during time t ,”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
      “according to the expression for variance detection, Eq. (20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Signal-to-noise ratio · p. 17

    The change in probability δp can be related to the change in signal δV as δp = δV^q |∂_V p(t)| ∝ (γtδV)^q, with q=1 for slope detection and q=2 for variance detection.

    “To further specify the SNR, the change in probability δp can be related to the change in signal δV as δp = δV q | ∂ q V p ( t ) | ∝ ( γtδV ) q , with q = 1 for slope detection and q = 2 for variance detection (see Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. AC signals with random phase · p. 22

    For a signal with fixed amplitude but random phase, the variance of the phase is given by Eq. (73), where V_rms = V_pk/√2 and W^2(f_ac) is the average over α = 0...2π of the weighting functions.

    “where V rms = V pk / √ 2 is the rms amplitude of the signal and W 2 ( f ac ) is the average over α = 0 . . . 2 π of the weighting functions,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28

    Relaxation can also be analyzed in the presence of a resonant drive field; this method is known as 'spin locking' in magnetic resonance.

    “Relaxation can also be analyzed in the presence of a resonant drive field. This method is known as 'spin locking' in magnetic resonance (Slichter, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Slichter, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 29

    All three phase estimation protocols can be considered variations of the phase estimation scheme depicted in Fig. 12(a).

    “All three protocols can be considered variations of the phase estimation scheme depicted in Fig. 12(a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25

    Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y(t), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral Eq. (85), where G_V(t) is the autocorrelation function of V(t).

    “Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral (Biercuk et al. , 2011; de Sousa, 2009)”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
      “where G V ( t ) is the autocorrelation function of V ( t ) (Eq. 81).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Biercuk et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites de Sousa, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28

    The dynamic range is given by the maximum allowed signal divided by the minimum detectable signal.

    “The dynamic range is then given by the maximum allowed signal divided by the minimum detectable signal,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 29

    The phase estimation scheme was originally put forward by Shor (1994) and interpreted by Kitaev (1995) as a phase estimation algorithm.

    “The scheme was originally put forward by Shor, 1994, in the seminal proposal of a quantum algorithm for prime factorization and has been interpreted by Kitaev, 1995, as a phase estimation algorithm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Shor, 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kitaev, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31

    The controlled-U gate does not change the eigenvector ψ, so that it can be re-used as often as required.

    “This is possible because the controlledU gate does not change the eigenvector ψ , so that it can be re-used as often as required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25

    In the frequency domain, the decay function can be expressed as Eq. (86), where |Y(ω)|^2 is the filter function of y(t), defined by the finite-time Fourier transform Eq. (87).

    “In the frequency domain the decay function can be expressed as”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
      “where | Y ( ω ) | 2 is the so-called fi lter function of y ( t ), defined by the finite-time Fourier transform”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. T ∗ 2 and T 2 relaxometry · p. 28

    Since S_V(ω) is often dominated by low-frequency noise, S_V||(0) is typically much larger than S_V⊥(ω0) and the high-frequency contribution can often be neglected.

    “Since S V ( ω ) is often dominated by low-frequency noise, S V || (0) is typically much larger than S V ⊥ ( ω 0 ) and the high-frequency contribution can often be neglected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31

    The joint probability distribution of all measurements is obtained from the product, from which the most likely value of φ is picked as the final result.

    “The joint probability distribution of all measurements is obtained from the product”
    • Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
      “from which the most likely value of φ is picked as the final result (Nusran et al. , 2012; Waldherr et al. , 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Nusran et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Waldherr et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29

    The DR ∝ T scaling is sometimes referred to as another instance of the Heisenberg limit, because it can be regarded as a 1/T scaling of sensitivity at a fixed V_max.

    “This scaling is sometimes referred to as another instance of the Heisenberg limit, because it can be regarded as a 1 /T scaling of sensitivity at a fixed V max .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30

    Quantum phase estimation based on the QFT requires two-qubit gates, which are difficult to implement experimentally, and the creation of fragile entangled states.

    “While quantum phase estimation based on the QFT can be performed with polynomial time effort, the algorithm requires two-qubit gates, which are difficult to implement experimentally, and the creation of fragile entangled states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § C. Relaxometry · p. 26

    Relaxometry connects the spectral density S_V(ω) of a noise signal V(t) to the relaxation rate Γ in first-order kinetics, χ(t) = Γt.

    “The aim of relaxometry is to connect the spectral density S V ( ω ) of a noise signal V ( t ) to the relaxation rate Γ in first-order kinetics, χ ( t ) = Γ t .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. T ∗ 2 and T 2 relaxometry · p. 28

    T*2 relaxometry probes the transition rate between the superposition states |±> = (|0> ± e^{-iω0t}|1>)/√2, corresponding to the free induction decay observed in a Ramsey experiment.

    “T ∗ 2 relaxometry probes the transition rate between the superposition states |±〉 = ( | 0 〉 ± e -iω 0 t | 1 〉 ) / √ 2. This corresponds to the free induction decay observed in a Ramsey experiment”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28

    Due to the presence of the resonant field, the degeneracy between |±> is lifted and the states are separated by the energy ħω1, where ω1 ≪ ω0 is the Rabi frequency of the drive field.

    “Due to the presence of the resonant field the degeneracy between |±〉 is lifted and the states are separated by the energy ℏ ω 1 , where ω 1 ≪ ω 0 is the Rabi frequency of the drive field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Dynamical decoupling · p. 26

    Since the filter function is dominated by the first harmonic (k = 1), the frequency corresponding to a certain τ is 1/(2τ).

    “Since the filter function is dominated by the first harmonic ( k = 1) the frequency corresponding to a certain τ is 1 / (2 τ ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30

    The QFT is replaced by measurement and classical feedback, which can be performed using a single qubit sensor.

    “The QFT is thus replaced by measurement and classical feedback, which can be performed using a single qubit sensor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 29

    The phase estimation problem can be generalized to estimating the phase shift φ imparted by passage through an interferometer or exposure to an external field.

    “This problem can be generalized to estimating the phase shift φ imparted by passage through an interferometer or exposure to an external field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30

    The quantum phase estimation algorithm scales linearly with the number of applications of U, which is proportional to the total measurement time T.

    “Hence, the algorithm scales linearly with the number of applications of ˆ U which in turn is proportional to the total measurement time T .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. T 1 relaxometry · p. 27

    Because T1 can be very long, very high sensitivities are in principle possible, assuming that the resonance is not skewed by low-frequency noise.

    “Because T 1 can be very long, very high sensitivities are in principle possible, assuming that the resonance is not skewed by low-frequency noise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30

    The key idea of adaptive phase estimation is to first measure the least significant bit of φ, subtract this value from the applied phase in the measurement of the next significant bit, and repeat in ascending order of the bits.

    “The key idea of adaptive phase estimation is to first measure the least significant bit of φ , represented by the lowest qubit in Fig. 12(b). In the measurement of the next significant bit, this value is subtracted from the applied phase.”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
      “This procedure is then repeated in ascending order of the bits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § VIII. DYNAMIC RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SENSING · p. 28

    The sensitivity of the measurement is proportional to the slope of the Ramsey fringe and reaches its optimum when t ≈ T2*.

    “The sensitivity of the measurement, on the other hand, is proportional to the slope of the Ramsey fringe and reaches its optimum when t ≈ T ∗ 2 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28

    Since dressed state relaxometry does not require sweeping a static control field for adjusting the probe frequency, it is more versatile than standard T1 relaxometry.

    “In addition, since dressed state relaxometry does not require sweeping a static control field for adjusting the probe frequency, it is more versatile than standard T 1 relaxometry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31

    The implementation by Bonato et al. (2016) scaled the number of resources N_m linearly according to a formula with typical values G=5 and F=2.

    “The implementation by Bonato, C. et al. , 2016, for example, scaled the number of resources N m linearly according to”
    • Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
      “with typical values of G = 5 and F = 2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bonato, C. et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29

    For the improved protocol, the maximum allowed signal is set by the shortest sensing time, V_max = π/(γt_0), and the smallest detectable signal is determined by the longest sensing time, V_min ≈ 2/(γC√(t_M T)).

    “The maximum allowed signal is then set by the shortest sensing time, V max = π/ ( γt 0 ), while the smallest detectable signal is determined by the longest sensing time, V min ≈ 2 / ( γC √ t M T ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. T ∗ 2 and T 2 relaxometry · p. 28

    Because a phase flip does not require energy, the spectral density is probed at zero frequency.

    “Because a phase flip does not require energy, the spectral density is probed at zero frequency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Dressed state methods · p. 28

    For a very large detuning, the effective frequency becomes similar to the detuning (ω_eff ≈ Δω), and the drive field only enters as a scaling factor for the spectral density.

    “For a very large detuning the effective frequency becomes similar to the detuning ω eff ≈ ∆ ω , and the drive field only enters as a scaling factor for the spectral density.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29

    Because T ∝ t_M due to exponentially growing interrogation times, the dynamic range of the improved protocol scales as DR ∝ T.

    “Because T ∝ t M due to the exponentially growing interrogation times, the dynamic range of the improved protocol scales as”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30

    The QFT recovers the phase φ from the Fourier series and places the register in a state whose measurement directly yields a digital representation of the phase φ.

    “The QFT recovers the phase φ from the Fourier series (109) and places the register in state”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
      “A measurement of the register directly yields a digital representation of the phase φ .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30

    In quantum sensing, phase tagging by back-action is replaced by the exposure of each qubit to an external field for a time 2^m t_0 (or passage through an interferometer of length 2^m l_0).

    “In quantum sensing, phase tagging by back-action is replaced by the exposure of each qubit to an external field for a time 2 m t 0 (or passage through an interferometer of length 2 m l 0 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30

    Quantum phase estimation is the core component of Shor's algorithm, where it is used to compute discrete logarithms with polynomial time effort.

    “Quantum phase estimation is the core component of Shor's algorithm, where it is used to compute discrete logarithms with polynomial time effort (Shor, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shor, 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. Dynamical decoupling · p. 25

    For large cycle numbers, the filter function Y_{n_c,τ_c}(ω) presents sharp peaks at multiples of the inverse cycle time τ_c^{-1}, and it can be approximated by a series of δ functions.

    “For large cycle numbers, Y n c ,τ c ( ω ) presents sharp peaks at multiples of the inverse cycle time τ -1 c , and it can be approximated by a series of δ functions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29

    Using exponentially growing sensing times t_m = 2^m t_0 allows an intuitive interpretation: subsequent measurements estimate subsequent digits of a binary expansion of the signal.

    “Although other scheduling is possible, this choice allows for an intuitive interpretation: subsequent measurements estimate subsequent digits of a binary expansion of the signal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25

    The filter function plays the role of a transfer function, and the decay of coherence is captured by the overlap with the noise spectrum S_V(ω).

    “Thus, the filter function plays the role of a transfer function, and the decay of coherence is captured by the overlap with the noise spectrum S V ( ω ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Phase estimation protocols · p. 29

    Adding an additional measurement step increases both precision and measurement duration t by a factor of two, such that precision scales linearly with total acquisition time T.

    “This scaling is obvious from an order-of-magnitude estimate: adding an additional measurement step increases both precision and measurement duration t by a factor of two, such that precision scales linearly with total acquisition time T .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31

    In practical implementations, the measurement of each digit is repeated multiple times or performed on multiple parallel qubits.

    “In practical implementations (Higgins et al. , 2007), the measurement of each digit is repeated multiple times or performed on multiple parallel qubits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31

    Adaptive estimation is technically more demanding since real-time feedback is involved, which often requires dedicated hardware.

    “Adaptive estimation is technically more demanding since real-time feedback is involved, which often requires dedicated hardware (such as field-programmable gate arrays or a central processing unit) for the fast decision making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    They have been used not only for sensing but also for enhanced lithography.

    “They have been used not only for sensing but also for enhanced lithography (Boto et al. , 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boto et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § B. Experimental realizations · p. 31

    The proposals of Shor, Kitaev and Griffiths were followed by a decade where research towards Heisenberg-limited measurements focused mostly on the use of entangled states, such as the N00N state.

    “The proposals of Shor (Shor, 1994), Kitaev (Kitaev, 1995) and Griffiths (Griffiths and Niu, 1996) were followed by a decade where research towards Heisenberglimited measurements has focused mostly on the use of entangled states, such as the N00N state (see Section IX).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shor, 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kitaev, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Griffiths and Niu, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    Then, the interrogation time also needs to be reduced by a factor M and no net advantage in sensitivity can be obtained.

    “Then, the interrogation time also needs to be reduced by a factor M and no net advantage in sensitivity can be obtained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 33

    One of the most impressive applications of squeezed states of light has been the sensitivity enhancement of the LIGO gravitational wave detector, obtained by injecting vacuum squeezed states in the interferometer.

    “One of the most impressive application of squeezed states of light (Ligo Collaboration', 2011; Schnabel et al. , 2010; Walls, 1983) has been the sensitivity enhancement of the LIGO gravitational wave detector (Collaboration, 2013), obtained by injecting vacuum squeezed states in the interferometer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ligo Collaboration', 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schnabel et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Walls, 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31

    All of the above variants of phase estimation achieve a DR ∝ T scaling of the dynamic range.

    “All of the above variants of phase estimation achieve a DR ∝ T scaling of the dynamic range.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Experimental realizations · p. 31

    Shortly after, both variants were translated into protocols for spin-based quantum sensing.

    “Shortly after, both variants have been translated into protocols for spin-based quantum sensing (Said et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Said et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32

    Squeezed states have been proposed early on to achieve the Heisenberg limit and have recently shown exceptional sensitivity.

    “In particular, squeezed states (Caves, 1981; Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993; Wineland et al. , 1992) have been proposed early on to achieve the Heisenberg limit and thanks to experimental advances have recently shown exceptional sensitivity (Hosten et al. , 2016a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Caves, 1981

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wineland et al., 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    N00N states have been conceived to improve interferometry.

    “Similar to GHZ states, N00N states have been conceived to improve interferometry (Lee et al. , 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32

    Optimal densities have been calculated both for atomic vapor magnetometers and ensembles of NV centers.

    “Optimal densities have been calculated both for atomic vapor magnetometers (Budker and Romalis, 2007) and ensembles of NV centers (Taylor et al. , 2008; Wolf et al. , 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Budker and Romalis, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Taylor et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wolf et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    This allows using an M-times shorter interrogation time or achieving an improvement of the sensitivity by a factor √M.

    “This allows using an M -times shorter interrogation time or achieving an improvement of the sensitivity (calculated from the QCRB) by a factor √ M .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31

    Here too, acquisition time scales with the significance of the bit measured to achieve the Heisenberg limit.

    “Here, too, acquisition time scales with the significance of the bit measured to achieve the Heisenberg limit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32

    The standard quantum limit can be overcome by using quantum-enhanced sensing strategies to reach a more fundamental limit where the uncertainty σ_p scales as 1/M.

    “The standard quantum limit can be overcome by using quantum-enhanced sensing strategies to reach a more fundamental limit where the uncertainty σ p (Eq. ( 25)) scales as 1 /M .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. Ensemble sensing · p. 32

    The sensitivity is then expressed per unit volume (∝ meters^{-3/2}).

    “The sensitivity is then expressed per unit volume ( ∝ meters -3 / 2 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    Still, N00N states are very fragile and they are afflicted by a small dynamic range.

    “Still, 'N00N' states are very fragile (Bohmann et al. , 2015) and they are afflicted by a small dynamic range.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bohmann et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31

    Experimentally, Bayesian estimation is usually simple to implement because no real-time feedback is needed and the phase estimation can be performed a posteriori.

    “Experimentally, Bayesian estimation is usually simple to implement because no real-time feedback is needed and the phase estimation can be performed a posteriori .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 33

    Squeezed states are promising for quantum-limited sensing as they can reach sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.

    “Squeezed states are promising for quantum-limited sensing as they can reach sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    The √M advantage in sensitivity is usually compensated by the GHZ state's increased decoherence rate, which is an issue common to most entangled states.

    “Unfortunately, the √ M advantage in sensitivity is usually compensated by the GHZ state's increased decoherence rate (Huelga et al. , 1997), which is an issue common to most entangled states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huelga et al., 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Experimental realizations · p. 31

    The experiment was subsequently extended to a nonadaptive version.

    “The experiment has subsequently been extended to a nonadaptive version (Higgins et al. , 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Experimental realizations · p. 31

    Weak measurements have been more generally proposed to enhance sensing protocols, but their ultimate usefulness is still under debate.

    “Weak measurements have been more generally proposed to enhance sensing protocols (), but their ultimate usefulness is still under debate ().”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    Using an M-particle interferometer, one can prepare an entangled Fock state.

    “Using an M -particle interferometer, one can prepare an entangled Fock state,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32

    Entanglement-enhanced sensing has been pioneered with atomic systems, especially atomic clocks.

    “Entanglement-enhanced sensing has been pioneered with atomic systems, especially atomic clocks (Giovannetti et al. , 2004; Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Giovannetti et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Leibfried et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Experimental realizations · p. 31

    A similar performance - 1/T scaling and an increased dynamic range - may be achieved by weak measurement protocols, which continuously track the evolution of the phase over the sensing sequence.

    “As a final remark, we note that a similar performance - 1 /T scaling and an increased dynamic range - may be achieved by weak measurement protocols, which continuously track the evolution of the phase over the sensing sequence (Kohlhaas et al. , 2015; Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kohlhaas et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32

    Achieving the Heisenberg limit requires reducing the variance of a chosen quantum observable at the expense of the uncertainty of a conjugated observable.

    “Achieving the Heisenberg limit requires reducing the variance of a chosen quantum observable at the expenses of the uncertainty of a conjugated observable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Heisenberg limit · p. 32

    This limit is also known as the Heisenberg limit.

    “This limit is also known as the Heisenberg limit .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 32

    The simplest example of the benefits of an entangled state for quantum sensing is given by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.

    “To understand the benefits that an entangled state can bring to quantum sensing, the simplest example is given by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 33

    Squeezed states of light have been introduced by Caves (1981) as a means to reduce noise in interferometry experiments.

    “Squeezed states of light have been introduced by Caves, 1981, as a mean to reduce noise in interferometry experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Caves, 1981

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31

    The variants differ by a constant offset.

    “They differ, however, by a constant offset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 32

    The sensing scheme with GHZ states is similar to a Ramsey protocol, but if M qubit probes are available, the preparation and readout pulses are replaced by entangling operations.

    “The sensing scheme is similar to a Ramsey protocol, however, if M qubit probes are available, the preparation and readout pulses are replaced by entangling operations (Fig. 13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    This has led to the quest for different entangled states that could be more resilient to decoherence.

    “This has led to the quest for different entangled states that could be more resilient to decoherence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    They were first introduced by Yurke (1986) in the context of neutron Mach-Zender interferometry as the fermionic 'response' to the squeezed states proposed by Caves (1981) for Heisenberg metrology.

    “They were first introduced by Yurke, 1986, in the context of neutron Mach-Zender interferometry as the fermionic 'response' to the squeezed states proposed by Caves, 1981, for Heisenberg metrology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yurke, 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Caves, 1981

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32

    State squeezing is routinely applied in optical systems, such as optical interferometers.

    “In parallel, state squeezing is routinely applied in optical systems, such as optical interferometers (Ligo Collaboration', 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ligo Collaboration', 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4. Comparison of phase estimation protocols · p. 31

    Quantum phase estimation by the QFT requires many entangled qubits.

    “Quantum phase estimation by the QFT, finally, requires many entangled qubits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § IX. ENSEMBLE SENSING · p. 32

    Apart from an obvious gain in readout sensitivity, multiple qubits allow for the implementation of second-generation quantum techniques, including entanglement and state squeezing, which provide a true 'quantum' advantage that cannot be realized with classical sensors.

    “Apart from an obvious gain in readout sensitivity, multiple qubits allow for the implementation of second-generation quantum techniques, including entanglement and state squeezing, which provide a true 'quantum' advantage that cannot be realized with classical sensors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1. GHZ and N00N states · p. 33

    Comparing with the Ramsey protocol, preparing a GHZ state enhances the oscillation frequency of the signal by a factor M, while the shot noise is unchanged since only one qubit is measured.

    “Comparing this result with what obtained in Sec. IV.C, we see that the oscillation frequency of the signal is enhanced by a factor M by preparing a GHZ state, while the shot noise is unchanged, since we still measure only one qubit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    While this is difficult to obtain for large qubit numbers, recent advances show great promise.

    “While this is difficult to obtain for large qubit numbers, recent advances show great promise (Hume et al. , 2013; Zhang et al. , 2012) (see also next section on alternative detection methods).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hume et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    However, imperfections in this measurement limits the sensitivity, since achieving the Heisenberg limit requires single-particle state detection.

    “However, imperfections in this measurement limits the sensitivity, since achieving the Heisenberg limit requires single-particle state detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    Spin squeezing can also be implemented in qubit systems following the original proposal by Kitagawa and Ueda (1993).

    “Spin squeezing can be also implemented in qubit systems (Auccaise et al. , 2015; Bennett et al. , 2013; Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009; Sinha et al. , 2003) following the original proposal by Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Auccaise et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bennett et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 35

    Compared to dynamical decoupling schemes, qubit protection covers the entire noise spectrum and is not limited to low-frequency noise.

    “Compared to dynamical decoupling schemes, qubit protection covers the entire noise spectrum and is not limited to low-frequency noise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 36

    Since QEC works independently of noise frequency, distinct operators for the signal and noise interactions are required.

    “Since QEC works independently of noise frequency, distinct operators for the signal and noise interactions are required.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 36

    In this scheme, which has recently been implemented with NV centers, the qubit sensor detects a signal along one axis while being protected against noise along a different axis.

    “In this scheme, which has recently been implemented with NV centers (Unden et al. , 2016), the qubit sensor detects a signal along one axis ( e.g. , a phase) while being protected against noise along a different axis ( e.g. , against bit flip).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Unden et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    The metrology squeezing parameter was proposed by Wineland et al. (1992).

    “The metrology squeezing parameter, proposed by Wineland et al. , 1992, is then”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wineland et al., 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 36

    The code |0〉_L = |000〉 and |1〉_L = |111〉 can correct against a single qubit flip error.

    “For example, the code | 0 〉 L = | 000 〉 and | 1 〉 L = | 111 〉 can correct against a single qubit flip error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    From the commutation relationship for the collective angular momentum, one can naturally define a squeezing parameter ξ < 1 for squeezed states.

    “For example, from the commutation relationship for the collective angular momentum, ∆ J α ∆ J β ≥ |〈 J γ 〉| , one can naturally define a squeezing parameter”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35

    Retrieval uses the same two c-NOT gates in reverse order.

    “Retrieval uses the same two c-NOT gates in reverse order.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    During the free evolution (step 3) an enhanced phase can be acquired, similar to what happens for entangled states.

    “Then, during the free evolution (step 3) an enhanced phase can be acquired, similar to what happens for entangled states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    The most common sensing protocols with squeezed states forgo step 4, and directly measure the population difference between the state |0> and |1>.

    “The most common sensing protocols with squeezed states forgo step 4, and directly measure the population difference between the state | 0 〉 and | 1 〉 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    To quantify the advantage of squeezed states in sensing, it is advantageous to directly relate squeezing to the improved sensitivity.

    “To quantify the advantage of squeezed states in sensing, it is advantageous to directly relate squeezing to the improved sensitivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    Early demonstrations of spin squeezing were obtained by entangling trapped ions via their shared motional modes, using repulsive interactions in a Bose-Einstein condensate, or partial projection by measurement.

    “Early demonstrations of spin squeezing were obtained by entangling trapped ions via their shared motional modes (Meyer et al. , 2001), using repulsive interactions in a Bose-Einstein condensate (Esteve et al. , 2008), or partial projection by measurement (Appel et al. , 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Meyer et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Esteve et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Appel et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    The degree of spin squeezing can be measured by several parameters.

    “The degree of spin squeezing can be measured by several parameters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35

    Correlation spectroscopy uses two sensing periods interrupted by a waiting time t1.

    “A first example includes correlation spectroscopy, where two sensing periods are interrupted by a waiting time t 1 (Laraoui and Meriles, 2013; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Laraoui and Meriles, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zaiser et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    A different strategy is to follow more closely the sensing protocol for entangled states, and refocus the squeezing (reintroducing step 4) before readout.

    “A different strategy is to follow more closely the sensing protocol for entangled states, and refocus the squeezing (reintroducing step 4) before readout (Davis et al. , 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davis et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 36

    These recent results hint at the potential of QEC for sensing which has just about begun to being explored.

    “These recent results hint at the potential of QEC for sensing which has just about begun to being explored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 33

    Squeezed states are characterized by a reduced uncertainty in one observable at the expense of another observable.

    “Squeezed states are then characterized by a reduced uncertainty in one observable at the expense of another observable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Storage and retrieval · p. 35

    For an electron-nuclear qubit pair, c-NOT gates have been implemented both by selective pulses and using coherent rotations.

    “For the example of an electron-nuclear qubit pair, c-NOT gates have been implemented both by selective pulses (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016) and using coherent rotations (Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pfender et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rosskopf et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zaiser et al. , 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 35

    Quantum error correction suppresses noise according to spatial symmetry, and not according to frequency.

    “Thus, quantum error correction suppresses noise according to spatial symmetry, and not according to frequency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § C. Quantum error correction · p. 36

    The simplest code is the 3-qubit repetition code, which corrects against one-axis noise with depth one (up to one error acting on one qubit).

    “The simplest code is the 3-qubit repetition code, which corrects against one-axis noise with depth one (that is, it can correct up to one error acting on one qubit).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 33

    The description of squeezed states is simplified by the use of a single collective angular-momentum variable.

    “However, the description of squeezed states is simplified by the use of a single collective angular-momentum variable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3. Parity measurements · p. 34

    In both cases, coupling of the quantum system to the detection apparatus is inefficient, often because strong coupling would destroy the very quantum state used in the metrology task.

    “In both cases, coupling of the quantum system to the detection apparatus is inefficient, often because strong coupling would destroy the very quantum state used in the metrology task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 34

    A simple quantum sensing scheme could be constructed by replacing step 2 with the preparation of a squeezed state, so that |ψ_0> is a squeezed state.

    “In this context, a simple quantum sensing scheme, following the procedure in Sec. IV.C, could be constructed by replacing step 2 with the preparation of a squeezed state, so that | ψ 0 〉 is a squeezed state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3. Parity measurements · p. 34

    Metrology schemes often require single qubit readout or the measurement of complex, many-body observables.

    “Metrology schemes often require single qubit readout or the measurement of complex, many-body observables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2. Squeezing · p. 33

    While for typical states the uncertainty in the two observables is on the same order, it is possible to redistribute the fluctuations in the two conjugate observables.

    “While for typical states the uncertainty in the two observables is on the same order, it is possible to redistribute the fluctuations in the two conjugate observables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37

    Overall, quantum sensing has the potential to fundamentally transform our measurement capabilities, enabling higher sensitivity and precision, new measurement types, and covering atomic up to macroscopic length scales.

    “Overall, quantum sensing has the potential to fundamentally transform our measurement capabilities, enabling higher sensitivity and precision, new measurement types, and covering atomic up to macroscopic length scales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
    • Rests on an assumption: Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
    • Rests on an assumption: NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 36

    These tools allow operation of the sensor over a wide signal frequency range, can be adjusted to maximize sensitivity and dynamic range, and allow discrimination of different types of signals by symmetry or vector orientation.

    “In particular, these allow operation of the sensor over a wide signal frequency range, can be adjusted to maximize sensitivity and dynamic range, and allow discrimination of different types of signals by symmetry or vector orientation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37

    A better understanding of decoherence in a particular implementation of a quantum system can help the adoption of strategies to protect the qubit, and guide the engineering and materials development.

    “A better understanding of decoherence in a particular implementation of a quantum system can help the adoption of strategies to protect the qubit, and guide the engineering and materials development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37

    Quantum sensing has become an important resource for quantum technologies as it provides much insight into the 'environment' of qubits, especially through decoherence spectroscopy.

    “Vice versa, quantum sensing has become an important resource for quantum technologies as it provides much insight into the 'environment' of qubits, especially through decoherence spectroscopy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 36

    While many experiments so far made use of single qubit sensors, strategies to implement entangled multi-qubit sensors with enhanced capabilities and higher sensitivity are just beginning to be explored.

    “While many experiments so far made use of single qubit sensors, strategies to implement entangled multi-qubit sensors with enhanced capabilities and higher sensitivity are just beginning to be explored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 37

    The border region between quantum sensing and quantum simulation is becoming a fertile playground for emulating and detecting many-body physics phenomena.

    “The border region between quantum sensing and quantum simulation, in addition, is becoming a fertile playground for emulating and detecting many-body physics phenomena.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § XI. OUTLOOK · p. 36

    Over the last decade, and especially in the last few years, a comprehensive toolset has been established that can be applied to any type of quantum sensor.

    “Over the last decade, and especially in the last few years, a comprehensive toolset has been established that can be applied to any type of quantum sensor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
169 of 169
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.

    “More recently, quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within the area of quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications.

    “However, since quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications, we will mostly focus on these definitions and discuss them extensively in this review.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In most situations the coupling between a quantum sensor and an external parameter is either linear or quadratic.

    “In most situations the coupling is either linear ( q = 1) or quadratic ( q = 2).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Charged systems, like trapped ions, are sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems mainly respond to magnetic fields.

    “Charged systems, like trapped ions, will be sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems will mainly respond to magnetic fields.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian H = H0 + HV(t) + Hcontrol(t).

    “For the following discussion, we will assume that the quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    H0 is known and Hcontrol(t) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.

    “We will assume that ˆ H 0 is known and that ˆ H control ( t ) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The signal is weak.

    “When the signal is weak (which is assumed here) ˆ H V ( t ) adds a small perturbation to ˆ H 0 .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The initialization basis {|0〉,|1〉} and the readout basis {|0'〉,|1'〉} are the same and U_b = U_a†.

    “For simplicity we assume that the initialization basis {| 0 〉 , | 1 〉} and the readout basis {| 0 ′ 〉 , | 1 ′ 〉} are the same and that ˆ U b = ˆ U † a , but this is not required.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The readout is projective.

    “We assume that the readout is projective, although more general positive-operator-valuedmeasure (POVM) measurements may be possible (Nielsen and Chuang, 2000).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    β = 1.

    “Since β is a constant of time, we will assume β = 1 in the following for reasons of simplicity.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones in Section VI.

    “In this Section VI, we will assume that the signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones and our goal will be to determine the signal's amplitude, frequency, phase or overall waveform.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t.

    “To illustrate this, we assume that the AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t_s for the Allan variance.

    “Assuming that the sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t s yielding the signal x j = x ( t j ) = x ( jt s ), the Allan variance is defined as”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.

    “Assuming that the estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased, ∆ V N obeys the so-called Cram´ er-Rao bound”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A projective measurement in the σ_x basis is performed for the Fisher information.

    “If we assume to perform a projective measurement in the σ x basis, {|±〉} = { 1 √ 2 ( | 0 〉±| 1 〉 ), giving the outcome probabilities p ( x ± | V ) = 〈±| ρ ( V ) |±〉 , the Fisher information is”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    t_m ≪ t for the exact optimum solution in slope detection.

    “Assuming t m ≪ t , we can find an exact optimum solution with respect to t .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Signals are static and deterministic in the earlier sections.

    “So far we have implicitly assumed that signals are static and deterministic.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The stochastic signal V(t) is Gaussian.

    “For the following analysis we will assume that the stochastic signal V ( t ) is Gaussian.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The autocorrelation function of V(t) decays on a time scale t_c shorter than the sensing time t, such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.

    “decays on a time scale t c that is shorter than the sensing time t , such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The noise is Gaussian and stationary.

    “Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).

    “Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The noise process is approximately Markovian.

    “The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.

    “The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate.

    “Since the noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate, the correction steps can be performed at a much slower rate compared to dynamical decoupling.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.

    “In fact, quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use, and have installed themselves as the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.

    “Likewise, atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.

    “Notably, NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.”
27 of 27

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum sensors can detect and measure physical phenomena at the quantum level, and quantum communication systems can securely transmit information over long distances.

    “These include quantum sensors which can detect and measure physical phenomena at the quantum level and quantum communication systems which can securely transmit information over long distances [37].”

    From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    Section A, “Quantum sensing” (p. 3), supports the sensor portion: it describes using a quantum object to measure a physical quantity. The Introduction (p. 2) mentions quantum cryptography, but our copy does not say that quantum communication systems securely transmit information over long distances. That portion of the sentence is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Quantum sensors can detect and sense phenomena at unprecedented sensitivity levels, opening up new possibilities for surveillance and security.

    “Quantum sensors can detect and sense phenomena at unprecedented sensitivity levels, opening up new possibilities for surveillance and security (Degen et al., 2017).”

    From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017

    The Outlook (pp. 36–37) describes quantum sensors as highly sensitive and capable of expanding measurement applications; it calls some existing devices the most sensitive magnetic-field detectors available. Neither those passages nor the passages retrieved for surveillance and security connect that capability to surveillance or security applications. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Quantum sensors operate by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to improve their sensitivity and accuracy.

    “Quantum sensors operate by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to improve their sensitivity and accuracy (Dowling, 2003; Degen et al., 2017; Jaeger, 2018).”

    From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017

  • Quantum technologies such as quantum sensing might enhance the quality of imaging data of biomolecular structures and improve the quality of data for further classical or quantum computations.

    “More generally, quantum technologies, such as quantum sensing, [243] might enhance the quality of imaging data of biomolecular structures (see e. g.Ref. [244]) and, therefore, improve the quality of the data on which further classical or quantum computations would be based.”

    From Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology** (2023) · cites this paper as [243]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Continuous sampling cites the wrong figure panel

    Minor

    The text points to Fig. 8(b) for continuous sampling, but the caption labels panel (b) as the correlation sequence and panel (c) as continuous sampling.

  • Single-ion clock record conflicts with listed uncertainties

    Minor

    The passage says single-ion clocks hold the accuracy record, but its listed uncertainty for the strontium ensemble clock is smaller than that for the single-ion ytterbium clock. On the passage's own comparison, the ensemble clock is more accurate.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Livanov, M., 1978, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 238, 253
  2. van der Sar, T., 2015, Nat. Commun., 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2017-07-25
Volume
89
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W3037447387
Cited by
4,045
References
392
Citations by year
2026: 601 · 2025: 827 · 2024: 641 · 2023: 473 · 2022: 425 · 2021: 378 · 2020: 307 · 2019: 236 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
113.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission (611143)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RE 3606/1-1)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-11-1-0400, W911NF-15-1-0548)
  • National Science Foundation (PHY0551153, PHY1415345)
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-03 16-1)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (200021_137520, NCCR QSIT)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum sensing, quantum sensors, precision metrology, qubits, quantum entanglement, quantum-enhanced sensitivity, timekeeping, sensor implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review