Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bypassing adverse injection reactions to nanoparticles through shape modification and attachment to erythrocytes

Open access
Wibroe, Peter Popp, Anselmo, Aaron C., Nilsson, Per H., Sarode, Apoorva, Gupta, Vivek, Urbanics, Rudolf, Szebeni, Janos, Hunter, Alan Christy, Mitragotri, Samir, Mollnes, Tom Eirik, Moghimi, Seyed Moein·2017·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

Intravenously injected nanopharmaceuticals, including PEGylated nanoparticles, induce adverse cardiopulmonary reactions in sensitive human subjects, and these reactions are highly reproducible in pigs. Although the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood, roles for both the complement system and reactive macrophages have been implicated. Here, we show the dominance and importance of robust pulmonary intravascular macrophage clearance of nanoparticles in mediating adverse cardiopulmonary distress in pigs irrespective of complement activation. Specifically, we show that delaying particle recognition by macrophages within the first few minutes of injection overcomes adverse reactions in pigs using two independent approaches. First, we changed the particle geometry from a spherical shape (which triggers cardiopulmonary distress) to either rod- or disk-shape morphology. Second, we physically adhered spheres to the surface of erythrocytes. These strategies, which are distinct from commonly leveraged stealth engineering approaches such as nanoparticle surface functionalization with poly(ethylene glycol) and/or immunological modulators, prevent robust macrophage recognition, resulting in the reduction or mitigation of adverse cardiopulmonary distress associated with nanopharmaceutical administration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nnano.2017.47

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Wibroe, P. P., Anselmo, A. C., Nilsson, P. H., Sarode, A., Gupta, V., Urbanics, R., Szebeni, J., Hunter, A. C., Mitragotri, S., Mollnes, T. E., & Moghimi, S. M.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
589-594
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2604206885
Cited by
205
References
3
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bypassing adverse injection reactions to nanoparticles through shape modification and attachment to erythrocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nnano.2017.47
The paper
Wibroe, P. P., Anselmo, A. C., Nilsson, P. H., Sarode, A., Gupta, V., Urbanics, R., Szebeni, J., Hunter, A. C., Mitragotri, S., Mollnes, T. E., & Moghimi, S. M. (2017). Bypassing adverse injection reactions to nanoparticles through shape modification and attachment to erythrocytes. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.47

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.