The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit
Open accessAbstract
The characterization and mitigation of decoherence in natural and artificial two-level systems (qubits) is fundamental to quantum information science and its applications. Decoherence of a quantum superposition state arises from the interaction between the constituent system and the uncontrolled degrees of freedom in its environment. Within the standard Bloch-Redfield picture of two-level sys tem dynamics, qubit decoherence is characterized by two rates: a longitudinal relaxation rate 1 due to the exchange of energy with the environment, and a transverse relaxation rate 2 = 1=2 + ' which contains the pure dephasing rate '. Irreversible energy relaxation can only be mitigated by reducing the amount of environmental noise, reducing the qubit’s internal sensitivity to that noise, or through multi-qubit encoding and error correction protocols (which already presume ultra-low error rates). In contrast, dephasing is in principle reversible a nd can be refocused dynamically through the application of coherent control pulse methods [1‐3]. In this work we demonstrate how dynamical-decoupling techniques can moderate the dephasing effects of low-frequency noise on a superconducting qubit [4‐6] with energy-relaxation time T1 = 1= 1 = 12� s. Using the CPMG sequence [7, 8] with up to 200 � -pulses, we demonstrate a 50-fold improvement in the transverse relaxation time T2 over its baseline value. We observe relaxation-limited times T CPMG 2 = 23� s � 2T1 resulting from CPMG-mediated Gaussian pure-dephasing times in apparent excess of 100� s. We leverage the filtering property of this sequence in conj unction with Rabi and energy relaxation measurements to facilitate the spectroscopy and reconstruction of the environmental noise power spectral density (PSD) [9, 10].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Keeping a Quantum Bit Alive by Optimized π -Pulse Sequences
Uhrig, G. S. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.100504 · Cited by 716
Cited by
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 · Cited by 4,045
Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook
Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231930 · Cited by 2,114
Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems
Xiang, Z.-L., Ashhab, S., You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.623 · Cited by 1,514
Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play
Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M. E., Braumüller, J., Krantz, P., Wang, J. I.-J., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2020) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 · Cited by 1,544
Self-citationCoherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., Chen, Y., Yin, Y., Chiaro, B., Mutus, J., Neill, C., et al. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.080502 · Cited by 779
Metadata
- Authors
- Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J.-S., & Oliver, W. D.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2011-05-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 565-570
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W1992629111
- Cited by
- 864
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys1994
- The paper
- Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J.-S., & Oliver, W. D. (2011). Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.