Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 864

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit

Open access
Bylander, Jonas, Gustavsson, Simon, Yan, Fei, Yoshihara, Fumiki, Harrabi, Khalil, Fitch, George, Cory, David G., Nakamura, Yasunobu, Tsai, Jaw-Shen, Oliver, William D.·2011·Nature Physics

Abstract

The characterization and mitigation of decoherence in natural and artificial two-level systems (qubits) is fundamental to quantum information science and its applications. Decoherence of a quantum superposition state arises from the interaction between the constituent system and the uncontrolled degrees of freedom in its environment. Within the standard Bloch-Redfield picture of two-level sys tem dynamics, qubit decoherence is characterized by two rates: a longitudinal relaxation rate 1 due to the exchange of energy with the environment, and a transverse relaxation rate 2 = 1=2 + ' which contains the pure dephasing rate '. Irreversible energy relaxation can only be mitigated by reducing the amount of environmental noise, reducing the qubit’s internal sensitivity to that noise, or through multi-qubit encoding and error correction protocols (which already presume ultra-low error rates). In contrast, dephasing is in principle reversible a nd can be refocused dynamically through the application of coherent control pulse methods [1‐3]. In this work we demonstrate how dynamical-decoupling techniques can moderate the dephasing effects of low-frequency noise on a superconducting qubit [4‐6] with energy-relaxation time T1 = 1= 1 = 12� s. Using the CPMG sequence [7, 8] with up to 200 � -pulses, we demonstrate a 50-fold improvement in the transverse relaxation time T2 over its baseline value. We observe relaxation-limited times T CPMG 2 = 23� s � 2T1 resulting from CPMG-mediated Gaussian pure-dephasing times in apparent excess of 100� s. We leverage the filtering property of this sequence in conj unction with Rabi and energy relaxation measurements to facilitate the spectroscopy and reconstruction of the environmental noise power spectral density (PSD) [9, 10].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys1994

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 864

Metadata

Authors
Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J.-S., & Oliver, W. D.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2011-05-08
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
565-570
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W1992629111
Cited by
864
References
1
FWCI
44.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys1994
The paper
Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J.-S., & Oliver, W. D. (2011). Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.