The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The energy–speed–accuracy trade-off in sensory adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Adaptation is the essential process by which an organism becomes better suited to its environment. The benefits of adaptation are well documented, but the cost it incurs remains poorly understood. Here, by analysing a stochastic model of a minimum feedback network underlying many sensory adaptation systems, we show that adaptive processes are necessarily dissipative, and continuous energy consumption is required to stabilize the adapted state. Our study reveals a general relation among energy dissipation rate, adaptation speed and the maximum adaptation accuracy. This energy–speed–accuracy relation is tested in the Escherichia coli chemosensory system, which exhibits near-perfect chemoreceptor adaptation. We identify key requirements for the underlying biochemical network to achieve accurate adaptation with a given energy budget. Moreover, direct measurements confirm the prediction that adaptation slows down as cells gradually de-energize in a nutrient-poor medium without compromising adaptation accuracy. Our work provides a general framework to study cost-performance trade-offs for cellular regulatory functions and information processing. It is well known that organisms profit from adapting to their environment. A study of stochastic adaptation dynamics shows that this comes at the expense of adaptive speed and accuracy—providing a framework for understanding adaptation in noisy biological systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
Niven, J. E., & Laughlin, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.017574 · Cited by 1,056
Dissipation and noise immunity in computation and communication
Landauer, R. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335779a0 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines
Seifert, U. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001 · Cited by 3,300
High-precision test of Landauer’s principle in a feedback trap
Jun, Y., Gavrilov, M., & Bechhoefer, J. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.190601 · Cited by 428
Central dogma rates and the trade-off between precision and economy in gene expression
Hausser, J., Mayo, A., Keren, L., & Alon, U. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07391-8 · Cited by 188
Optimal resource allocation in cellular sensing systems
Govern, C. C., & ten Wolde, P. R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1411524111 · Cited by 141
Biological feedback control-Respect the loops
El-Samad, H. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.004 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Lan, G., Sartori, P., Neumann, S., Sourjik, V., & Tu, Y.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2012-03-25
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 422-428
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W1983388907
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.