Cited by 428Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Enginesstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

High-precision test of Landauer’s principle in a feedback trap

Open access
Jun, Yonggun, Gavrilov, Momčilo, Bechhoefer, John·2014·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We confirm Landauer's 1961 hypothesis that reducing the number of possible macroscopic states in a system by a factor of 2 requires work of at least kTln2. Our experiment uses a colloidal particle in a time-dependent, virtual potential created by a feedback trap to implement Landauer's erasure operation. In a control experiment, similar manipulations that do not reduce the number of system states can be done reversibly. Erasing information thus requires work. In individual cycles, the work to erase can be below the Landauer limit, consistent with the Jarzynski equality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.113.190601

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]R. Klages, W. Just, and C. Jarzynski, eds., Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics of Small Systems: Fluctuation Relations and Beyond (Wiley-VCH, 2013).
  2. [23]M. Gavrilov, Y. Jun, and J. Bechhoefer, Proc. SPIE 8810 (2013).
  3. [26]M. Gavrilov, Y. Jun, and J. Bechhoefer, arxiv:1406.1839 (2014). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jun, Y., Gavrilov, M., & Bechhoefer, J.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
113
Issue
19
Pages
190601-190601
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1813753580
Cited by
428
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 2
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
Landauer's principle, information erasure, Jarzynski equality, work fluctuations, information thermodynamics, information-to-work conversion, stochastic thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review